Politics Trump wants to meet ‘whistleblower’

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
barfo said:
Not holding my breath. Trump thinks he's Jesus, and a certain subset of Americans agree with him.

barfo
Click to expand...

What an incredibly poignant analysis. How you come up with this stuff is sometimes breathtaking.
 
BonesJones said:
Do you really think people read these?
Click to expand...

Yes, I believe anyone who wants to be fully informed on the actual happenings that affect the world around them are willing to spend a minute or 2 to peruse a few hard facts that weren't spoon-fed to them by the Fake News. Some people like to know the truth. Can't know it if you only hear one side.

That's why I force myself to check out CNN, OPB, and the Networks every day. Balance.

I know Lanny doesn't read them, or Cupwizer, which begs the question "why do they always feel the need to respond?"

It's a free country and nobody can force you to be informed, but responding adversely to something you do not know the contents of is simply trolling.
 
MARIS61 said:
Yes, I believe anyone who wants to be fully informed on the actual happenings that affect the world around them are willing to spend a minute or 2 to peruse a few hard facts that weren't spoon-fed to them by the Fake News. Some people like to know the truth. Can't know it if you only hear one side.

That's why I force myself to check out CNN, OPB, and the Networks every day. Balance.

I know Lanny doesn't read them, or Cupwizer, which begs the question "why do they always feel the need to respond?"

It's a free country and nobody can force you to be informed, but responding adversely to something you do not know the contents of is simply trolling.
Click to expand...
If you wanted to fully inform us youd provide us with multiple prospectives, but you don't, so it seems like theres probably another angle in play here.
 
MARIS61 said:
Yes, I believe anyone who wants to be fully informed on the actual happenings that affect the world around them are willing to spend a minute or 2 to peruse a few hard facts that weren't spoon-fed to them by the Fake News. Some people like to know the truth. Can't know it if you only hear one side.

That's why I force myself to check out CNN, OPB, and the Networks every day. Balance.

I know Lanny doesn't read them, or Cupwizer, which begs the question "why do they always feel the need to respond?"

It's a free country and nobody can force you to be informed, but responding adversely to something you do not know the contents of is simply trolling.
Click to expand...
I get my news from Pravda. Sure, go ahead and laugh but it's not the deep state news. If Trump likes them then so should I.
 
MARIS61 said:
Yes, I believe anyone who wants to be fully informed on the actual happenings that affect the world around them are willing to spend a minute or 2 to peruse a few hard facts that weren't spoon-fed to them by the Fake News. Some people like to know the truth. Can't know it if you only hear one side.

That's why I force myself to check out CNN, OPB, and the Networks every day. Balance.

I know Lanny doesn't read them, or Cupwizer, which begs the question "why do they always feel the need to respond?"

It's a free country and nobody can force you to be informed, but responding adversely to something you do not know the contents of is simply trolling.
Click to expand...

...you do know that you can simply post the LINK, instead of copying and pasting a whole wall of words, right?
 
ABM said:
But, seriously, I don't think they're impeachable offenses.
Click to expand...

What do you think would be an impeachable offense?

If fraud, election crimes, abandoning allies on the battlefield, doing the bidding of other nations, abuse of power, hiring the weak, the crooked, and the corrupt, lying to the public daily, attacking his own government, putting kids in cages, advocating violence, obstructing justice, nepotism, and massive grift aren't impeachable.... what is?

barfo
 
barfo said:
What do you think would be an impeachable offense?

If fraud, election crimes, abandoning allies on the battlefield, doing the bidding of other nations, abuse of power, hiring the weak, the crooked, and the corrupt, lying to the public daily, attacking his own government, putting kids in cages, advocating violence, obstructing justice, nepotism, and massive grift aren't impeachable.... what is?

barfo
Click to expand...

hint: it dont exist.
 
barfo said:
What do you think would be an impeachable offense?

If fraud, election crimes, abandoning allies on the battlefield, doing the bidding of other nations, abuse of power, hiring the weak, the crooked, and the corrupt, lying to the public daily, attacking his own government, putting kids in cages, advocating violence, obstructing justice, nepotism, and massive grift aren't impeachable.... what is?

barfo
Click to expand...
Getting oral in the wrong place.
 
barfo said:
What do you think would be an impeachable offense?

If fraud, election crimes, abandoning allies on the battlefield, doing the bidding of other nations, abuse of power, hiring the weak, the crooked, and the corrupt, lying to the public daily, attacking his own government, putting kids in cages, advocating violence, obstructing justice, nepotism, and massive grift aren't impeachable.... what is?

barfo
Click to expand...

Tell that to your compadres in democratic power that could actually make something happen! Then get back to me.
 
ABM said:
Tell that to your compadres in democratic power that could actually make something happen! Then get back to me.
Click to expand...

That answer doesn't make any sense. The question was what you personally think would be an impeachable offense.

barfo
 
barfo said:
That answer doesn't make any sense. The question was what you personally think would be an impeachable offense.

barfo
Click to expand...

The operative word is.....prove it. That's why I deferred to your liberal leaders.
 
barfo said:
That answer doesn't make any sense. The question was what you personally think would be an impeachable offense.

barfo
Click to expand...

It's right out of the trump playbook with dodge, deflect and distract. Toss in some smugness and there you have the play book.
ABM said:
Not dodging a thing.
Click to expand...

Then why don't you answer his question then. :smiley-hmm:
 
CupWizier said:
It's right out of the trump playbook with dodge, deflect and distract. Toss in some smugness and there you have the play book.


Then why don't you answer his question then. :smiley-hmm:
Click to expand...

I suppose I'd answer it like this: If anything/everything being trotted out against Trump leads to his impeachment (being ousted), then so be it. I'll move on accordingly. In the meantime, he's still the President. We could all fight tooth-and-nail in here - or wherever - until the cows come home, and it won't make a blip of difference in the grand scheme of things. Everything becomes, cutesy, smug, and divisive....yet irrelevant. I've already told y'all that I would support Kasich over Trump in a heartbeat. I truly wanted him the be the Republican nominee in 2016. Didn't happen. Therefore, I voted "against" Hillary...and would again. Trump is now the POTUS. I'm not going to defect on him just because of the allegations. Let's see how it plays out. Oh, and if Trump is the 2020 nominee, I'd still vote for him again over any Dem due to every-single-Dem's position on abortion. The Dems talk about separating mothers from their children at the border.....well, what about the womb?!
 
ABM said:
I suppose I'd answer it like this: If anything/everything being trotted out against Trump leads to his impeachment (being ousted), then so be it. I'll move on accordingly. In the meantime, he's still the President. We could all fight tooth-and-nail in here - or wherever - until the cows come home, and it won't make a blip of difference in the grand scheme of things. Everything becomes, cutesy, smug, and divisive....yet irrelevant. I've already told y'all that I would support Kasich over Trump in a heartbeat. I truly wanted him the be the Republican nominee in 2016. Didn't happen. Therefore, I voted "against" Hillary...and would again. Trump is now the POTUS. I'm not going to defect on him just because of the allegations. Let's see how it plays out. Oh, and if Trump is the 2020 nominee, I'd still vote for him again over any Dem due to every-single-Dem's position on abortion. The Dems talk about separating mothers from their children at the border.....well, what about the womb?!
Click to expand...

barfo didn't ask for your bs company line. He asked you a question as to what do you think would be an impeachable offense? I will even add in some more

Do approve of the stonewalling this administration is doing?

Do you think they should turn over all documents regarding the investigation to congress?

Do you consider this administration the most transparent admin ever as trump continues to claim? or one of the most transparent? and why?
 
CupWizier said:
barfo didn't ask for your bs company line. He asked you a question as to what do you think would be an impeachable offense? I will even add in some more

Do approve of the stonewalling this administration is doing?

Do you think they should turn over all documents regarding the investigation to congress?

Do you consider this administration the most transparent admin ever as trump continues to claim? or one of the most transparent? and why?
Click to expand...

I believe the Dems are doing everything in their power (and beyond) to take Trump down. There's a clog in the swamp.
 
ABM said:
I believe the Dems are doing everything in their power (and beyond) to take Trump down. There's a clog in the swamp.
Click to expand...

You're dodging the questions. We want an answer.

:mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob:
 
ABM said:
'd still vote for him again over any Dem due to every-single-Dem's position on abortion.
Click to expand...

I meet a lot of people with this view point. I just dont get how someone can be a single issue voter, especially when its been proven that democrat policies result in less abortions while republican policies result in more abortions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top