Bogus! Trump's latest presser (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

A very big hand. It appears the local democrats in most cities and the media are a tandem team.
 
I decry nothing of the sort. I said I was ambivalent about the statues. This was meant to suggest that the people who live there should decide, not some vocal minority from Berkeley.
or san diego or anywhere else. you sited polls from a national selection of participants and a state wide one for decisions made at a local level not of the constituents whom elected the officials doing the removals
 
A very big hand. It appears the local democrats in most cities and the media are a tandem team.

I don't even think it's Democrats.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/15/confederate-statues-washington-241663

Confederate statues in U.S. Capitol likely going nowhere
Some Democrats have called for the removal of 10 monuments, but Republicans say it's up to individual states.

Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) on Tuesday did call for lawmakers in both parties “to work with me to ensure the permanent removal of all offensive and despicable Confederate imagery” from the Capitol. But other congressional Democrats have largely stayed out of the fray.
 
or san diego or anywhere else. you sited polls from a national selection of participants and a state wide one for decisions made at a local level not of the constituents whom elected the officials doing the removals

I cited three polls, all local to specific cities in the south who have monuments. Two unscientific ones from local newspaper WWW sites, and a third that polled citizens of New Orleans.
 
I said I was ambivalent about the statues.

I don't have a feel for statues either, even when they get to Washington. But I know that will not be enough. I am very sure the destruction of my country is the target.
I will object.
 
Last edited:
I don't have a feel for status either, even when the get to Washington. But I know that will not be enough. I am very sure the destruction of my country is the target.
I will object.

By definition, destruction of the country is required for anarchy or something to replace capitalism.

These fringe extremists are anarchists and anti-capitalists.

They are violent in their demonstrations even before this one.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-berkeley-trump-rally-20170415-story.html
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-portland-protests-20170604-story.html

To name two obvious recent examples.
 
I cited three polls, all local to specific cities in the south who have monuments. Two unscientific ones from local newspaper WWW sites, and a third that polled citizens of New Orleans.
the third pole was state wide and not local or representative of new Orleans citizens exclusively because of that, nor were they site specific other than the unscientific paper one. you know this so irrelevant to the discussion
 
the third pole was state wide and not local or representative because of that, nor were they site specific other than the unscientific paper one. you know this so irrelevant to the discussion

Good enough. These polls are the best I could find.

McAuliffe is governor of Va. He's elected by a state-wide vote. The polls of his state on this issue suggest he's going against the will of the people with his flip-flop. Not political expediency - more likely fear. That would be terrorism working, no?

We'll have to see how the push polls for the question nationally turns out.
 
By definition, destruction of the country is required for anarchy or something to replace capitalism.

These fringe extremists are anarchists and anti-capitalists.

They are violent in their demonstrations even before this one.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-berkeley-trump-rally-20170415-story.html
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-portland-protests-20170604-story.html

To name two obvious recent examples.
I keep seeing posts on other forums I just read (banned) that say the counter protestors were throwing urine and feces in bags or cups or something like that and soda cans filled with cement.

I have never seen a single thing about it anywhere.

I literally am unsure if that happened.
 
I keep seeing posts on other forums I just read (banned) that say the counter protestors were throwing urine and feces in bags or cups or something like that and soda cans filled with cement.

I have never seen a single thing about it anywhere.

I literally am unsure if that happened.

Look, if some random person posts something on the internet, it's true by definition.

barfo
 
Look, if some random person posts something on the internet, it's true by definition.

barfo

If they have video, it's hard to argue against.

You believe stuff written in crayon, so there's that.
 
The article doesn't say which side did that. It says that the counterprotestors threw water balloons filled with pink paint.
I guess that's better than urine or feces. I'm sure the Nazis brought tiki torches and feces filled bags.
 
I guess that's better than urine or feces.

A good sight better, yeah. I know which I'd rather be hit by.

The tiki torches were for the Parties Unlimited branded mob of angry villagers the night before, not the Saturday protest/counterprotest.
 
But, since the press hasn't said it was counter protestors we'll just have to guess. Hmmmmm
 
A good sight better, yeah. I know which I'd rather be hit by.

The tiki torches were for the Parties Unlimited branded mob of angry villagers the night before, not the Saturday protest/counterprotest.
I know, I was being sarcastic. They had guns on their ankles.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top