Politics Turning GA, NC, NV, and/or PA into victory (Biden vs Trump, 2020 election!) (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

lol... did you actually read that? Oh, the comprehension thingy again. It's amazing that you actually believe he's succeeded.


Total fail...but I will however give you 1 point for effort. (copying and pasting)


And it wasn't meant as an insult, I'm a bit concerned and again, maybe a professional can do some sort of test or something.

there was never a question about success or failure. It was what agenda.
I answered your question and you respond with more insults.

fun times..
 
there was never a question about success or failure. It was what agenda.
I answered your question and you respond with more insults.

fun times..


lmao...no, you responded with an ill-advised link that proved absolutely nothing. If I had insulted you the mods will probably edit it or removed it...if you complain enough.

...but anyway, what good is an "agenda" if it is not brought to fruition? I could say that my agenda is to have sex with Jessica Alba but that means nothing if after 4 years it hasn't happened.
 
Last edited:
Neither party gives a flying fuck about America, in the slightest. And hypocrites from both parties are worried about civil discussions, that's fucking rich.
 
lmao...no, you responded with an ill-advised link that proved absolutely nothing. If I had insulted you the mods will probably edit it or removed it...if you complain enough.

...but anyway, what good is an "agenda" if it is not brought to fruition?

This will go nowhere. If you don't understand that demeaning ones sanity and comprehension skills based on your opinion, is an insult, that's on you.
Come back when you are able to be civil and ill gladly continue the discussion.
Movin on now.
 
Most likely these new policies on top of his existing ones. I’ll only post what he’s already said.
1.) Bring back the essential manufacturing of medications, PPE, and medical equipment to the US.
2.) Payroll tax cut
3.) Infrastructure bill

there is more to it.
I wasn't for the wall. I was concerned about his Leadership qualities regarding trustworthyness and i was concerned about his lack of foreign policy and affairs experience.
However, i found these to be superseded by my distaste for Hilary’s foreign policy aNd affairs handlings.
I didn't care for her reactions to Bill being caught lying about sexual activity in the ahite house. Whether she was in on the cover up or was imply ambivalent. Scary either way.

but mostly it was about infrastructure improvements both domestically aNd politically in DC and my belief in limited government. Government being there for the needs of the worst off. Not to level the playing field for all so lazy people can reap the same handouts as disabled, elderly and the ones thst work hard.


the fact is we aren't all the same and one persons ambition and drive can be more than another's. When we take away the rewards that come from that, we suppress creativity.
Creativity and invention brought us sooo many of the great things we have today.

im not a fan of socialism. I think it paves the way to one of two outcomes. BreAdlines like the Stalin days or braindead sheeple following like zombies a media leader. possibly both.

I believe people should be rewarded for their hard work. Not have the results taken away and just be given the same amount as the next guy who has zero work ethic.

I am for equal rights and opportunities. Im not for equal economic status.

that is the main reasoning behind my republicanism and why i vote primarily red.
 
This will go nowhere. If you don't understand that demeaning ones sanity and comprehension skills based on your opinion, is an insult, that's on you.
Come back when you are able to be civil and ill gladly continue the discussion.
Movin on now.

I didn't say anything about your sanity, and the thing you're also now whining about was not intended as an insult, which I've already addressed and edited shortly before reading your reply.

Seems like you're purposely using your somehow hurt feelings to divert attention to what we were discussing, which was about Trump's master agenda/platform for the upcoming election. You responded with a link about what he said 4 years ago. If you really feel you've been insulted, well, that just seems like a smoke screen to me.
 
lol...pretty much what I thought, you have no idea.

No, you have no idea. Flailing at the hip...as expected. Go back and re-read the exchange. Maybe it'll all come back to you. Maybe.
 
No, you have no idea. Flailing at the hip...as expected. Go back and re-read the exchange. Maybe it'll all come back to you. Maybe.

lol...You're something else...but I'm not sure what.

Try starting with post #527 and go from there...maybe you can figure it out, but I'm not sure about that either.
 
I didn't say anything about your sanity, and the thing you're also now whining about was not intended as an insult, which I've already addressed and edited shortly before reading your reply.

Seems like you're purposely using your somehow hurt feelings to divert attention to what we were discussing, which was about Trump's master agenda/platform for the upcoming election. You responded with a link about what he said 4 years ago. If you really feel you've been insulted, well, that just seems like a smoke screen to me.

considering we have yet to vote for this upcoming election and the discussion, i thought l, was what agenda did he run on that i voted for or would vote for, i posted a link to the topics, rather than put time into typing it all out. My opinion is this conversation doesnt warrant that type of effort because it will never go anywhere.
I haven't voted yet for this upcoming election so my thoughts at this point are irrelevant because i cant predict the future and how i will vote in the fall.
In my opinion, voting records and preferences can only be applied to votes of the past. Not for the future.

but i will amswer for this upcoming election, mags is correCt.
I want to continue repairing and improving infrastructures.
But mostly, as i eluded to in another post,

it seems the dems as a whole have moved more towards socialism and im not for that.
For me voting isn't about who has the better or worse character. Thats Hollywood superficial crap. I didn't care about Clintons tomfoolery either. I care about policies.
 
@Strenuus we can discuss how sure you think Trump will lose in this thread. :)


So you're posting a video about how silly it was that everyone wrote off Trump as an impossibility at the exact same time that you (and a lot of other conservatives here) are writing Biden off as an impossibility.

You see the irony too, right?
 
So you're posting a video about how silly it was that everyone wrote off Trump as an impossibility at the exact same time that you (and a lot of other conservatives here) are writing Biden off as an impossibility.

You see the irony too, right?

only ironic if Biden wins. If he loses its comedy. Not irony. :)
 
lol...You're something else...but I'm not sure what.

Try starting with post #527 and go from there...maybe you can figure it out, but I'm not sure about that either.

Yeesh.

It's not necessarily Biden's policies I'd be concerned about, yank. It's his ongoing inability to comprehend and relate. He's in way over his head. Obama knows this and cautioned Joe way upstream.

https://www.gq.com/story/obama-to-biden-dont-run

Sadly for them, at this point, most all of his colleagues really have no choice but to endorse the man. Hillary's a political hound dog. She'll grasp at anything and everything to stay in the public arena. Her glowing endorsement of Biden was nothing short of icky sweet.
 
More like a meltdown on their part.

This garners a hobbs laugh, baby!

:biglaugh:

One could conclude that you are melting down with your excessive laughing and eating popcorn majority of the time. Be a participant once in a while.
 
So you're posting a video about how silly it was that everyone wrote off Trump as an impossibility at the exact same time that you (and a lot of other conservatives here) are writing Biden off as an impossibility.

You see the irony too, right?
I think if you read back a few posts earlier, I said that we think Biden is the “most favorable candidate” to run against. That’s not writing him off. And at the same time, I said we will bust our asses until the polls close because we don’t want to see what the 2016 Dems did. Which is why I shared the videos of the Dems writing off Trump.
 
I think if you read back a few posts earlier, I said that we think Biden is the “most favorable candidate” to run against. That’s not writing him off.

You've asserted many times that Trump is going to win. Not that you think it's likely, that he will win. Sounds exactly like Democrats in 2016. Not to mention all the other comments (not necessarily from you) that Democrats have already thrown this race.

You're fooling yourself if you think "oh, but this is different."
 
You've asserted many times that Trump is going to win. Not that you think it's likely, that he will win. Sounds exactly like Democrats in 2016. Not to mention all the other comments (not necessarily from you) that Democrats have already thrown this race.

You're fooling yourself if you think "oh, but this is different."
I do think he’s gonna win, just as I did in 2016. Im even more confident now as I was back then. Why? Because I think the enthusiasm of Trump supporters are much higher than Biden.

If it makes you feel better to think I’m contradicting myself, be my guest.
 
Interesting conclusion. Not sure if that is factual. Hobbs isn't really the meltdown type.

No. He isn't. It would be nice to see more participation though
 
saying one isn't sure if something is factual is not the same as saying something is not factual......
 
How can you claim it's not factual? It may not be your opinion, but that doesn't make it not factual.

How can you claim it's factual. Maybe it's just your opinion. But, that doesn't make it factual
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top