US, Israel Warships in Suez May Be Prelude to Faceoff with Iran

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Denny Crane

It's not even loaded!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
73,114
Likes
10,945
Points
113
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/138164

US, Israel Warships in Suez May Be Prelude to Faceoff with Iran

by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

Egypt allowed at least one Israeli and 11 American warships to pass through the Suez Canal as an Iranian flotilla approaches Gaza. Egypt closed the canal to protect the ships with thousands of soldiers, according to the British-based Arabic language newspaper Al Quds al-Arabi.

One day prior to the report on Saturday, Voice of Israel government radio reported that the Egyptian government denied an Israeli request not to allow the Iranian flotilla to use the Suez Canal to reach Gaza, in violation of the Israeli sea embargo on the Hamas-controlled area.

International agreements require Egypt to keep the Suez open even for warships, but the armada, led by the USS Truman with 5,000 sailors and marines, was the largest in years. Egypt closed the canal to fishing and other boats as the armada moved through the strategic passageway that connects the Red and Mediterranean Seas.

Despite Egypt’s reported refusal to block the canal to Iranian boats, the clearance for the American-Israeli fleet may be a warning to Iran it may face military opposition if the Iranian Red Crescent ship continues on course to Gaza.

The warships may exercise the right to inspect the Iranian boat for the illegal transport or weapons. Newsweek reported that Egyptian authorities could stop the ship for weeks, using technicalities such as requiring that any official documents be translated from Farsi into Arabic.

The magazine’s website also reported that the Iranian navy is the weakest part of its armed forces. Tehran has already backed down from announced intentions to escort the Iranian ships with "volunteer marines” from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

The Iranian news site Hamsayeh.net reported, “The move might be in connection to U.S. self-inflicted embargo against Iran aimed at inspecting Iran bound ships for suspected goods related to the country’s nuclear program.”

Another battle on the high seas may involve one, and possibly two, Lebanese vessels that are aimed at challenging Israel’s sovereignty over the Gaza coastal waters. Hizbullah, gearing up for a reaction to a possible clash between the Israeli Navy (pictured) and the Lebanese boats, has delayed rocket units near Lebanese ports, according to unofficial military sources.

Israel has warned U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon that Israel will use force, if necessary, to stop the boats, one of which is carrying approximately 70 women passengers and crew organized by Hizbullah support Samar al-Hajj. Her husband is one of several jailed suspects involved in the assassination for former Lebanese anti-Syrian Prime Rafik Hariri.

Hizbullah has denied it is connected with the Lebanese flotilla, but it has been reported that Al Hajj met with Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah last month. (IsraelNationalNews.com)
 
Why can't we all just get along?
 
I wonder if this is Obama's idea or Hillary's.
 
War is coming between Iran and the West sooner or later. It's better that it's sooner, before they get the bomb.
 
You plan for worst-case, hope for best-case.

If Iran gets (and uses) the bomb, their way of life ends as they know it. It'll make 1945 Tokyo look good...they'll have civilian rioting, an annihilation of their military/industrial complex, international sanctions blocking their rebuilding efforts, estrangement from many of the countries that are tacitly backing them right now, etc. Their best bet (if the bomb is made) is to keep a few stowed away somewhere and keep doing what they're doing...using the media to obfuscate the issue and keep building up their caches, so that they have at least a pair of aces to bring to the table in negotiations.

EDIT: Tactically, I actually think they're being smart...keep thumbing their nose at Israel and the West with "humanitarian" flotillas and highly-charged religious and political rhetoric, hoping that the other side does something stupid (yet, in the grand scheme of things, harmless) that allow Iran to claim victimhood and divide the sides even more. Open war doesn't get them nearly the benefit as

I also wonder how much the religious leaders of Iran understand their military (I don't count Mahmoud, he's a puppet). Their navy doesn't stand a puncher's chance against the remnants of Fifth Fleet we have over there, much less the hell that would come upon them if there was open war. Their Navy is old, decrepit and small...their Air Force isn't that much better. Their air defense (thank you, Russia!) is actually pretty good, but I'd imagine the Israelis would happily take their chances. No, Iran's better off continuing what they're doing.
 
Last edited:
You plan for worst-case, hope for best-case.

If Iran gets (and uses) the bomb, their way of life ends as they know it. It'll make 1945 Tokyo look good...they'll have civilian rioting, an annihilation of their military/industrial complex, international sanctions blocking their rebuilding efforts, estrangement from many of the countries that are tacitly backing them right now, etc. Their best bet (if the bomb is made) is to keep a few stowed away somewhere and keep doing what they're doing...using the media to obfuscate the issue and keep building up their caches, so that they have at least a pair of aces to bring to the table in negotiations.

If Iran uses the bomb, Israel ceases to exist.

Brian, I think you're making the mistake of believing this regime is rational. You simply cannot have irrational people have control of a nuclear weapon.
 
If Iran uses the bomb, Israel ceases to exist.

Brian, I think you're making the mistake of believing this regime is rational. You simply cannot have irrational people have control of a nuclear weapon.

I'm not saying that they're rational (I edited a bit in the post above), I'm saying that I'm not sure that even Iran wants to be the sacrifical lamb it would become if they were the ones who rid the Islamic world of their mortal Jewish enemies.
 
I'm not saying that they're rational (I edited a bit in the post above), I'm saying that I'm not sure that even Iran wants to be the sacrifical lamb it would become if they were the ones who rid the Islamic world of their mortal Jewish enemies.

I think the idea of the coming of the 12th Imam makes them not view themselves as being sacrificial lambs. Hey, Kim Jong-Il may be crazy, but at least he wants to survive. The theocracy in Iran I'm not sure has the same viewpoint.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top