A$AP Meyers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,114
- Likes
- 946
- Points
- 113
accident!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have to say Kudos to Blazer bench for not responding. Especially Nards.
Though, I wouldn't have minded if they did fight there.
Does this look like a person who was thinking about responding?
![]()
Hurd defending Cousins and saying he didn't spit the mouth piece was the final straw. I'm officially done with him. I hereby formally declare I miss the Mikes.
would the mouth piece hitting nards in the face have made it a 10?On the Ron Artest scale of natural acts, with 1 being Karl Malone and 10 being Draymond Green, that was about an 8.
If you're a high school soccer coach, you get fired. Did anyone see that in the news?i wonder what the penalty for just leaving a game would be. cause thats what the blazers should have done. after they brought back cousins, every single one of them should have left.
I could buy that it was an accident if he tried to catch his mouthpiece as it was flying out, as would be the normal reaction for most rational humans if a mouthpiece accidentally comes out. I may even give him some more leeway if he bothered to pick it back up after it was on the ground. The fact that he just walked off after he spit it out indicated to me that it was clearly intentional at that point.
So let me get this straight. The spineless piece of shit NBA refs rescinded the technical foul after the video clearly showed Cousins purposely and with malice aforethought spit his mouthpiece at the Blazers bench? NBA refs could not be more pathetic. It would be comical, if I didn't wish NBA basketball had some integrity.
So their mafia boss told them they needed Cousins to break 50, so they'd better leave him in?That was not something the refs could video review.
So their mafia boss told them they needed Cousins to break 50, so they'd better leave him in?
On what basis did they rescind an obvious technical?
That was not something the refs could video review.
