Vince Carter 51 points, ties career high

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
AirJordan

AirJordan

JBB JustBBall Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
1,301
Likes
0
Points
36
Vince...what can I say, hes back.

always has good games against the heat 51 points 13-25,
8 Rebs, 4 Assists

23/24 FT...dayum
 
k since vince is back! stupid toronto
doh.gif
no.gif
 
Vince Carter should be an all-star strater he outplayed Wade.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting vcwannabe15:</div><div class="quote_post">Vince Carter should be an all-star strater he outplayed Wade.</div>


One game does, not determine an All Star. If Tony Parker outplays Steve Nash in a game, does he deserve an apperence more than Nash?
 
Does anyone else think its pretty sad his career high is fifty one points?
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting AznxBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">Does anyone else think its pretty sad his career high is fifty one points?</div>

No... but I bet you there are tons of people that think its pretty sad you posted that.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
No... but I bet you there are tons of people that think its pretty sad you posted that.</div>
...And here's my justification for my comment. Seriously, I'm not a Carter hater or anything, in fact he's on my fantasy team and I'm pretty happy he got fifty one points tonight. But when I heard this was his career high, I was kind of confused. I mean, I was seriously surprised because I thought his career high would actually be a bit higher. I guess I just thought that someone with Carter's athleticism, skills, ability to get to the rim, and him being the number one option in Toronto, that it would be higher than fifty one points. I guess I over emphasized when I said "sad" so I guess the correct term would be disapointed?
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting AznxBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">...And here's my justification for my comment. Seriously, I'm not a Carter hater or anything, in fact he's on my fantasy team and I'm pretty happy he got fifty one points tonight. But when I heard this was his career high, I was kind of confused. I mean, I was seriously surprised because I thought his career high would actually be a bit higher. I guess I just thought that someone with Carter's athleticism, skills, ability to get to the rim, and him being the number one option in Toronto, that it would be higher than fifty one points. I guess I over emphasized when I said "sad" so I guess the correct term would be disapointed?</div>
Hey, Kobe's career high was 51 until that 62 point game a few days ago. Career highs don't define how good you are as a player; heck, Tony Delk's career high is 53.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting AznxBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">...And here's my justification for my comment. Seriously, I'm not a Carter hater or anything, in fact he's on my fantasy team and I'm pretty happy he got fifty one points tonight. But when I heard this was his career high, I was kind of confused. I mean, I was seriously surprised because I thought his career high would actually be a bit higher. I guess I just thought that someone with Carter's athleticism, skills, ability to get to the rim, and him being the number one option in Toronto, that it would be higher than fifty one points. I guess I over emphasized when I said "sad" so I guess the correct term would be disapointed?</div>

Yeah, I would agree here. With all the "Va-Va-Voom" surrounding Carter, you'd wonder why his career high was 51 points.. Though that is a great stat for any player, Carter was the number 1 option on a team where he could do whatever the heck he wanted. Like you said, his skills alone should account for more than 51 points, but the fact that he was able to shoot whenever he wanted, drive whenever he wanted, and was the driving force on a playoff caliber team for quite a while, it's kinda suprising.. The fact that he reached his season average on free-throws alone is interesting. I didn't watch the game, but to be fouled enough to get 24 freethrows, he'd have to be fouled atleast 8 times (that is, if he shot 3s every time he was fouled).

I do not hate Carter though, nor do I dislike him. It's good to see that such a great player mopped by other problems (injuries, crappy team, etc.) is finally getting back to the top, and he went over 50% from the field, only missed a free-throw, grabbed 8 boards, and played against a SOLID heat line-up.. that's good for him. Kinda odd he only had 4 assists, for all the points he had scored -- but I guess that happens when you play with Jason Kidd.

EDIT: Funny how 3 Rocket board posters post in a row .. That's weird.
tongue.gif
 
What do you expect? The game was on National TV. It's a known fact. On National TV, Carter plays at this level, if it's not a national tv broadcast, more often than not he'll return to his inner softness.

<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Locke:</div><div class="quote_post">Hey, Kobe's career high was 51 until that 62 point game a few days ago. Career highs don't define how good you are as a player; heck, Tony Delk's career high is 53.</div>

I believe Kobe's previous career high was 56, and he did that against Memphis in 3 quarters.

In regards to AznxBaller's comment, I think Philly fans have pretty high standards as far as socring records and career highs are concerned.
 
vince showed why he is a 5 time starter in the all star game DWade got a wake up call 2nyt showin that hes gonna have to come with it evey nyt if he wants to be considered great
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting playmaker15:</div><div class="quote_post">vince showed why he is a 5 time starter in the all star game DWade got a wake up call 2nyt showin that hes gonna have to come with it evey nyt if he wants to be considered great</div>

Considering you're defending Vince, this has got to be the most ironic argument anyone has ever come up with.
 
VC's Amazing!

Vince Carter's been playing great basketball. And not just this game (Broadcast or not
nono.gif
), he's attacking more and very aggressive on both ends of the floor. Before tonights game, VC averaged 31.5 points, 6.1 rebounds, 3.9 assists, shooting close to 47 percent from the field, 39 percent from 3's and almost 86 percent from the FT in the last 4 games. The Nets looks like the Nets team that charged into the playoffs last year. Now all we need is to get some consistency from the bench and greater numbers from Richard Jefferson.

GO NETS!
laugh.gif
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting AznxBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">Does anyone else think its pretty sad his career high is fifty one points?</div>

confused.gif
Is it sad Kevin Garnetts career high is only 47?
dunno.gif
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">What do you expect? The game was on National TV. It's a known fact. On National TV, Carter plays at this level, if it's not a national tv broadcast, more often than not he'll return to his inner softness.</div>Vince can and will be lazy from time to time, and nothing can change that. But to go so low and say something like that is unneccessary. The past five games haven't been on national television, and he's been nothing short of spectacular.
 
umm it wasnt on national tv??
unless you live in the miami area or have league pass...then you would be able to see that game..
 
This game wasn't on National TV.

Nets have turned it around lately, thanks in large part to Vince Carter. He's definitely the POM thus far. He's becoming more agressive, hense the high (compared his regular averages) 8.8 FTA per game he has this month.
 
i wanted the heat to foul carter one more time, so he can get his career high and team all time high
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting AznxBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">Does anyone else think its pretty sad his career high is fifty one points?</div>

Kevin Garnetts high is 47. And before that it was 40 for a long time. I was surprised by that. I guess you could think of that as like Tony Delk having 52 points and he's not even a starter. Still though 50 points is impressive by anyone.
 
once VC gets into a zone like he was in last night there is no defender that can stop him not Bowen Artest or Prince unless Bowen wants to try and injure him again.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Bowen wants to try and injure him again.</div>

Yea and when Carter ran after him all mad, Bowen started yelling to the refs
"What did I do?" What and idiot.
 
Career highs really dont mean that much like mentioned b4 Ton Delk had 53 points and he sucks and besides that I like the fact that Vince is attacking the basket and getting free throws when he plays like this he is one of the top 5 players in the L.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
Kevin Garnetts high is 47. And before that it was 40 for a long time. I was surprised by that. I guess you could think of that as like Tony Delk having 52 points and he's not even a starter. Still though 50 points is impressive by anyone.</div>
Garnett having a lower career high actually makes sense to me. Because he's not a guard or wing player, he can't exactly dictate whether not he's going to score. He needs a guard to bring it up court to him and get the play set up. However, Carter has an advantage which is the reason why I'm surprised about his career high. He played on a team where he was the only option, he brings it up the court for the majority of the posessions, and Carter can score on the fast break or half court set while Garnett generally needs to set up down low before scoring.
 
Carter was called too unselfish at times in Toronto, and too many times when he needed to take more shots, he would try to get his "unskilled" teammates involved. That should tell you why he hasn't scored more than 51 points before.

Pierce's career high is 48 points, Ray Allen's is 47 points, so it's not really a big deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top