Voters to president: Less talk, more action

[Denny Crane]

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100128/D9DGMVKG1.html

Voters to president: Less talk, more action

LAS VEGAS (AP) - When Al Melquist voted for Barack Obama in 2008, the unemployed software engineer was drawn to the politician's charisma and promise of solutions for the nation's economic woes and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the time since, Melquist has given up looking for work. The house in Las Vegas where he lived sits empty and bank-owned after his landlord didn't make mortgage payments for 13 months. He is burning through his savings and doing Web site work to make ends meet for his family of five, while working on his own startup.

Millions of Americans like Melquist tuned in to the president's State of the Union address Wednesday night, aching for solutions but wary - aware that in too many places voters are no better off today than when they lifted Obama into the White House.

Many have become so disillusioned with their economic situations that they are tired of all the politics and promises and want action.

"He just says so many things," the 41-year-old Melquist said of Obama. "I just don't trust what he says is actually going to happen."

Obama acknowledged in his speech that economic devastation remains - in joblessness, shuttered businesses and declining home values - and the change he wanted everyone to believe in "has not come fast enough." He also declared that it's time to "seize this moment" and "get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth."

While Obama's attempt to reconnect with everyday Americans hit the notes many expected to hear, some wonder whether he and other lawmakers can follow through and actually get things done.

Jeorge Carrillo watched the speech on TV between attending to patients during his night shift as an emergency room nurse in Miami Beach. Carrillo expressed deep disappointment that a health care bill has not passed and criticized Obama for making broad statements without offering specific plans, but he was glad to hear the president urge lawmakers not to let health reform languish.

"I'm cautiously hopeful," said Carrillo, 47, who voted for John McCain in 2008. "You talk a good talk, now walk the walk. Let's see you walk the walk."

Obama's focus on jobs was especially important in states like Nevada and Michigan.

In Nevada, rapid tourism growth has collapsed in a spectacular two-year meltdown of job losses, foreclosures and bankruptcies. The state posted the highest foreclosure rate in the nation last year, with more than one of every 10 housing units hit with at least one foreclosure filing. The unemployment rate was 13 percent in December.

Melquist said after the speech that he wished Obama would have talked only about jobs and the economy.

"He talked about too much stuff," Melquist said. "A normal American who is trying to make ends meet, we don't really care about Iraq. We don't really care about Afghanistan. We don't really care about health care reform."

In Michigan, unemployment hit 14 percent in 2009 amid a historic collapse of the auto market.

Michigan resident Dianne Impullitti simply exclaimed "Yes!" when Obama said job creation must be the top priority in 2010.

Impullitti, who is studying renewable energy at a community college after losing her job as an automotive tool designer in August 2008, called the speech hopeful and said she was worried jobs had taken a back seat to health care.

"I was definitely encouraged by things he said and the things he plans on putting out there," she said. "Now, I want to see the details. I want to see where it goes."

Eric Dixon of Philadelphia said he wished he had heard more from Obama about efforts to help people who experience racial and employment discrimination. He did like the president's proposal for a 10 percent tax credit for employers and thought it could help his efforts to get a trucking job.

"He was talking about the middle class, but how about the ordinary person?" Dixon said. "I don't even make $10,000 a year."

Some wondered whether other lawmakers would help Obama or hinder him.

"As always, I'm impressed by the president, how he speaks and his oratory skills. I'm just frustrated with the system," said Ethan Ehrlich, a 32-year-old nurse-anesthetist from Miami Beach. "And you could tell by the body language, how the Republicans just sat there for so much, that tomorrow it will be business as usual."

Frank Beaty, a 55-year-old Las Vegas man who has been working raising money for nonprofits while bouncing back from a 2005 bankruptcy, said Obama sent a clear, clever message to lawmakers that they should help him in his work even if it's not politically convenient.

Beaty, who said he had not voted for a president before Obama and was not sure before the speech whether he would support him again, said the speech was exactly what he wanted to hear.

But he said he doesn't think 2010 will be significantly better than 2009.

"No matter what we do, it's going to take some time," he said.

 

[Denny Crane]

If Democrats had made the economy and jobs their signature legislations, they would be looking at gaining seats in the house and senate. Doing too little, too late, during an election year isn't the kind of transparency that people were expecting.

 

[maxiep]

The problem with President Obama is that he sees the Government as the answer to every problem. Sometimes, the best thing the Government can do it just to get out of the way. When you demonize business and say how much you're going to tax them, how can a rational person decide to increase employment?

 

[MrJayremmie]

The problem with President Obama is that he sees the Government as the answer to every problem. Sometimes, the best thing the Government can do it just to get out of the way. When you demonize business and say how much you're going to tax them, how can a rational person decide to increase employment?

I agree. In many situations this is the best route. But in others, IMO, it simply is not. I think there is a delicate balance here. I don't think Obama is doing a very good job. There is more government and spending than i'd like.

The thing is, the Republicans say less government and fiscal restraint when they are out of office, but they are the opposite in office. So who the hell will help us? I think Ron Paul would, but it is doubtful he can get elected.

I'm still reserving real judgment until he is near the end of his first term. Then I will judge. I think at the end of a term, then a decade of more later is when you should judge a president.

I agree with the voters here. I also think Congress needs to get its ass into shape and stop this partisan bickering on both sides. So fuckin' sick of this type of politics. You are employed by us, for us, do your fucking job or give it to someone that can. I don't give a shit if you get re-elected. Your job is to do what is best for us. If you do that instead of playing politics, I guarantee your re-election chances will be better.

 

[Shapecity]

From last night ...

“We can’t afford another so-called economic “expansion” like the one from the last decade…, where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.”

Only to then state...

“That’s why we’re working to lift the value of a family’s single largest investment — their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments.”

Contradict much?

 

[Shapecity]

I agree. In many situations this is the best route. But in others, IMO, it simply is not. I think there is a delicate balance here. I don't think Obama is doing a very good job. There is more government and spending than i'd like.

The thing is, the Republicans say less government and fiscal restraint when they are out of office, but they are the opposite in office. So who the hell will help us? I think Ron Paul would, but it is doubtful he can get elected.

I'm still reserving real judgment until he is near the end of his first term. Then I will judge. I think at the end of a term, then a decade of more later is when you should judge a president.

I agree with the voters here. I also think Congress needs to get its ass into shape and stop this partisan bickering on both sides. So fuckin' sick of this type of politics. You are employed by us, for us, do your fucking job or give it to someone that can. I don't give a shit if you get re-elected. Your job is to do what is best for us. If you do that instead of playing politics, I guarantee your re-election chances will be better.

I think this is where it goes wrong. These pricks don't do for us, they do for what lines their pockets and their campaign contributer's pockets. The US has become a complex version of a banana republic.

 

[blue32]

same shit, different head... get over it. Ask yourself what did the previous prez do? Then ask yourself how quickly.

 

[Denny Crane]

From last night ...

“We can’t afford another so-called economic “expansion” like the one from the last decade…, where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.”

Only to then state...

“That’s why we’re working to lift the value of a family’s single largest investment — their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments.”

Contradict much?

I noticed several similar contradictions.