Walker: Collective-bargaining law doesn’t save money

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MrJayremmie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
3,438
Likes
27
Points
48
Thought this deserved its own thread...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelo...r-collective-bargaining-law-doesnt-save-money

Remember how Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin was insisting that his controversial law to end collective bargaining for most public employees was needed to help save money and balance the budget?

Well, he's now acknowledging that's not exactly true.

During testimony before the House Oversight and Government Affairs committee in Washington, Walker, a Republican, was badgered by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) about how much money his law would actually save, reports the Capitol Times of Madison. The topic of the hearing, after all, was state and municipal debt, so Kucinich wondered how the collective bargaining law was relevant.

After some hemming and hawing by Walker, Kucinich asked flat out: "How much money does it save Gov. Walker? Just answer the question."

"It doesn't save any," Walker responded.

Last month, the effort by Walker and Wisconsin Republican legislators to pass the collective bargaining measure brought thousands of protesters to the state Capitol for weeks. The bill ultimately passed, but is on hold after Democrats challenged the procedure used for passing it.

Walker and Republicans have said that the law is needed to help reduce public-sector pensions and benefits that they see as lavish, and balance the budget. Democrats and unions have said they're willing to negotiate on those issues, and see the law as an effort to curb the political power of the labor movement.

And it looks Walker just bolstered their case.
 
Wasn't his main argument about the fiscal problem, and that this needed to happen? And if it didn't pass, he would lay off a ton of government employees?

Looks like he will be voted out by a landslide once the next election comes around.
 
Wasn't his main argument about the fiscal problem, and that this needed to happen? And if it didn't pass, he would lay off a ton of government employees.

The change to payments of pension plans and medical benifits was what saved the money. The changes of collective bargaining rights was to ensure that the money saved wasn't made up in future benefit negotiations outside of wages, which can still be negotiated. So, had Walker said that that CBA rights for extra benefits would save money in this budget, he would have been lying.


Looks like you don't know what you're talking about, as usual, and this certainly isn't worth its own thread when there is a huge thread already about Wisconsin.
 
Last edited:
Of course it didn't save any money right now; they're still under the current contract. Wait until the new contract. It was also meant for the local municpalites more than the State. THAT's where the real savings will come from.

Nice try though. It's a fun little trick Rep. Kucinich does; ask questions that only reveal part of the truth, and only the truth you wish to see.
 
His new budget will keep property taxes from rising more than 1% each of the next two years

This is an obvious lie. It's like saying the budget will prevent gravity from failing.

Property taxes in Wisconsin will not rise more than 1% each of the next two years ANYWAY. They will likely fall as property values continue to plummet.

Yeah, because government would never dramatically raise millage rates and property taxes are always based on current appraisal value.

Time to go back for CE; putting your picture on a card and calling yourself a REALTOR isn't enough.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top