Exclusive War with Iran starting this week? (7 Viewers)

[JfizzleBlazer]

 

[2Fluffy4U]

No I think twitter posts and AI are not the same. A Twitter post is sharing what someone else is saying. Users can do their own research on if they agree or not.

You posting AI slop, means you are passing it off as if it is your own writing and opinion. Which is disingenuous. Users can still do their own research, but you are taking ownership of it as your own.

If you rewrote things and it wasn't so obvious you are copying and pasting, nobody would care.

Fair point on transparency, I've never hidden that I use Claude, I've said it openly multiple times in this thread. That's the opposite of disingenuous. The ideas are mine, the framework is mine, the questions I'm asking are mine. AI helps me organize and articulate them more clearly than I could bashing them out on a phone keyboard. If the argument holds up, it holds up regardless of what tool helped write it. Attack the logic, not the workflow.

 

[Phatguysrule]

I am 40. I work with AI daily.
I recommned joining the wagon. I prefer my comments based and factual. Verified. I use AI to help me make sure I dont write conspiracies.

Sure it is. But what is your interest? What do you want?

I want my country to work for the greater good.

 

[crandc]

First, I am not on Twitter although I occasionally show someone's tweet.

Problem with your AI: It makes premises that are just not factually correct. NO ONE, repeat NO ONE, has EVER mistaken Trump for some kind of strategic genius. Any time you post something that claims he is strategic thinker or even that he appointed such people to his cabinet, frankly, it makes the entire post have zero credibility. My cat is a vastly better strategic planner than Trump.

There are some sources that have reliability by virtue of a history of being generally factually correct. Not perfect, but usually.
AI is not one such.

 

[2Fluffy4U]

First, I am not on Twitter although I occasionally show someone's tweet.

Problem with your AI: It makes premises that are just not factually correct. NO ONE, repeat NO ONE, has EVER mistaken Trump for some kind of strategic genius. Any time you post something that claims he is strategic thinker or even that he appointed such people to his cabinet, frankly, it makes the entire post have zero credibility. My cat is a vastly better strategic planner than Trump.

There are some sources that have reliability by virtue of a history of being generally factually correct. Not perfect, but usually.
AI is not one such.

That post was a shared hebrew translated into english written analisys from an Israeli analyist. It was refernced in the post as a 'view' / topic for consideration - not factual data premise.
Claiming no one has ever claimed that only makes the point very narrow and centralist - unable to fathom 'others' ideations and conspetions.
Here is a subreddit with someone claiming Trump is a strategic genius - (I was not sharing his ideation here) but just saying that nullyfies your comment.