Can someone explain to me another young team that, without veteran presence that had won anything, learned to win the right way on their own?
I can't recall off the top of my head. But I think there's much more value in a short-term rental like Nash or, dare I say it, Kidd (and of course Parker) as our starting PG. I think Sergio and Bayless/Koponen could be groomed for it in a couple years. I think just about everyone in here underestimates how much we need a veteran PG who Nate knows is better than he was who's won something to help this team out.
And Batum needs not only to start, but to play crunch time. Our problems in crunch time aren't not having enough shooters on the floor, but of not having a lot of people who do "dirty work" at the end of the games. It's why I wanted Przy on the floor at the end of games last year. It's why I think Przy and Batum should be on the floor now. Rudy/Outlaw and Roy and LMA are plenty of offense...bring in Travis offense/defense if you want...but yesterday there wasn't anyone there to rebound Rudy's wide-open miss. There wasn't anyone collecting the Jazz misses during the 4th quarter. When LMA is your great rebounding hope ('cuz let's face it...Blake, Roy, Frye and Outlaw aren't sniffing close to the hoop at all--and Rudy's outside waiting for the 3--at the end of the game), something is way wrong.
I think a less-intrusive consolidation is required. Look at what the market dictates for Frye, Blake, Diogu and Raef. Definitely keep one of the Bayless/Sergio combo, though I'd give up Bayless first since I imagine he has much more value, and Sergio can turn into a really good distribution PG.
Nash first. Then Kidd. But I think that's what we need to target. Moreso than the Harris types.
Crazy thought...could D-Wade play PG for our team?