BTOWN_HUSTLA
NOW BUZZ KILLINGTON
- Joined
- May 6, 2009
- Messages
- 2,624
- Likes
- 11
- Points
- 38
again, if he didn't pay him that salary, he'd have a cap hold that would cripple our summer plans I believe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
again, if he didn't pay him that salary, he'd have a cap hold that would cripple our summer plans I believe?
They could have let him go as a free agent, then he wouldn't have a caphold.
I'm not saying they should have, but that was also an option. If they had, they'd have an extra $5 million of cap space this summer or so.
According to the salary link at S2, Martell's extension starts next season at 4.4M covering 4 seasons toping out at 5.8M. There is a team option at the end of year #2. That strikes me as palatable.I wonder what makes Webster's contract so "cheap" - the average NBA salary is $5.3m - so he starts right there and will go up from there - but a USA Today article from last year showed that the average SF salary in the league is $3.7m - so Webster - who is a below-average SF - especially for a starter - will be paid more than that. I am certain they really thought he would have a breakout year or had a range for a specific trade target they coveted - but until proven otherwise - his salary does not seem "cheap".
Obviously, I'm not a huge supporter of Webster, but his value also includes upside. The majority of starting SF's are a lot older and near their peak. Webster at least has the potential of becoming average or above average. That makes him worth paying more.
Also, I assume there are some SF's still on their rookie contracts, which further drag down the average salary. The rookie contracts are an artificial barrier to paying people their true value. Danny Granger is not being paid what he's worth if he were free to negotiate a contract.
But yeah, you've got a pretty good point. Webster isn't a cut-rate bargain. Particularly if you factor in that Paul Allen paid him a year of that salary to not even suit up.
According to the salary link at S2, Martell's extension starts next season at 4.4M covering 4 seasons toping out at 5.8M. There is a team option at the end of year #2. That strikes me as palatable.
hey no problemThanks. This really makes it much more reasonable. I was under the impression it starts at $5m and goes up from there. Thanks for pointing us to the right information.
I find when we have a common set of accurate facts, posters often find themselves with less to disagree about. I'll take this one step further and tell you (and everyone) where to get that link the next time it's needed.I am in the Webster is a far more complete player than Travis will ever be court by the way.
Martell Webster = LeBron James x Michael Jordan / 2
If you stuck those people together and then cut them in half (perhaps at the waist), you wouldn't get a very good player. Or even a live player. I dare say Webster is better than that.
Easy mistake to make. He wrote "x" not "+"
What you really have to do is look at MJ's best PER year (in the 30s) and LeBron (same) - multiply them (900) and divide by 2. This projects Webster's best year as having 450+ PER. He is definitely a bargain for this production...
