Wenyen Gabriel?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Ask Dame who he would want on the court with 5 minutes left on the road and the game is tied. We need players who can contribute NOW son. Time is a tickin.

As long as it is on offense. On defense, it's just as lopsided the other way. And remember, Dame spoke so highly of Meyers at Draft time. Appreciate the loyalty, but sometimes it is blind.
 
I actually liked Gabriel. For spot minutes. I think he could be a disruptive defender. I mean he was a pest to Anthony Davis before he’d pick up tons of fouls real quick.

But I don’t think he’ll ever be a real meaningful player outside of just spot minutes.

And for that, I’m out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I think you're inflating the value and worth of Gabriel. My point isn't that I think Melo is some great get, it's that we're arguing over TWO guys who are barely in the league.
Correct this for you...
 
LOL. You completely ignore my point. MELO is a net NEGATIVE player. There is plenty of evidence for that.

Again, we have no idea of what Gabriel can become.
Gabriel will not be what he "Can Become" this year. We need a player that can effect a game off the bench RIGHT NOW.

Your argument has no merit at all. Gabriel is a dime a dozen player.
 
Ask Dame who he would want on the court with 5 minutes left on the road and the game is tied. We need players who can contribute NOW son. Time is a tickin.
Hey, so long as that's the ONLY time Melo is on the floor, I'm fine with it.
 
How did this discussion get from Gabriel v Giles to Gabriel v Melo?

IMHO, Melo has zero to do with this. We dumped Gabriel (and buried Little) in favor of Oden 2.0. Whatever theoretical value Giles might have is eclipsed by his injury concerns. Signing him was not a "win now" move. This was more taking on a charity case.
 
How did this discussion get from Gabriel v Giles to Gabriel v Melo?

IMHO, Melo has zero to do with this. We dumped Gabriel (and buried Little) in favor of Oden 2.0. Whatever theoretical value Giles might have is eclipsed by his injury concerns. Signing him was not a "win now" move. This was more taking on a charity case.
this is a bit harsh. Giles actually has better numbers and an equivalent injury history to Collins.
 
I actually liked Gabriel. For spot minutes. I think he could be a disruptive defender. I mean he was a pest to Anthony Davis before he’d pick up tons of fouls real quick.

But I don’t think he’ll ever be a real meaningful player outside of just spot minutes.

And for that, I’m out.
He should have gone to play in China a couple years then come back to the assoc.
 
Giving up on a 22 yr old who has played just 100 games while having produced in Giles seems silly. Same with Collins.

(had wrong birthdays disregard)


No sillier than relying on players with injury problems to make a major contribution.

Who is relying on either of them (Giles or Collins) to make a "major" contribution??
 
Dang, this forum kinda obsesses over fringe players. Gabriel is an end of the bench or in street clothes on this team
 
Was waiting to bump this thread when Gabriel scored his first point this season.

Still waiting.
Well done. I saw this bumped and thought to myself oh, I bet Wenyen put up like 8 and 4 last night and someone is going to bitch about us letting him go.
 
Presumably we ditched Wenyen because we were signing Harry Giles.
On the season:
Giles III: -67
Gabriel: +7
 
I see harry getting better & better. He's still getting his confidence back and he's finally getting consistent minutes. The light will eventually go on for him.
 
Presumably we ditched Wenyen because we were signing Harry Giles.
On the season:
Giles III: -67
Gabriel: +7

Also on the season:

Points
Giles III: 57
Gabriel: 0

Rebounds
Giles III: 92
Gabriel: 4

PER
Giles III: 10.9
Gabriel: -1.4

Blocks
Giles III: 8
Gabriel: 0

FG%
G3: 40%
WG: 0%

Minutes
G3: 227
WG: 10
 
I see harry getting better & better. He's still getting his confidence back and he's finally getting consistent minutes. The light will eventually go on for him.
I hope so as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top