What a Buffoon

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Denny Crane said:
Your point is that she's just a grandmother in NY state. HuffPost disproved that.

I disproved your point.
Click to expand...

That wasn't my point and that's not what you did. Read @barfo 's response. My point is that you keep talking about the refs in the 2000 WCF and no one cares anymore. Nobody but you thinks Hillary is a relevant talking point. It's boring. But whatever. Was just trying to given you a friendly S2 posting tip.
 
Stevenson said:
That wasn't my point and that's not what you did. Read @barfo 's response. My point is that you keep talking about the refs in the 2000 WCF and no one cares anymore. Nobody but you thinks Hillary is a relevant talking point. It's boring. But whatever. Was just trying to given you a friendly S2 posting tip.
Click to expand...

My point is that Clinton is entirely relevant because she and her organization are the entire source of the Russia nonsense.

She wrote a fucking book and went on tour. Grandma in NY state, my ass.

My point about sycophants is proven, thank you.
 
barfo said:
Not everybody is as hung up on Hillary as you are, Denny. What her ex-campaign staffers do/don't push as a story line isn't that relevant.

barfo
Click to expand...

She paid those people for years. Take a look at who was paid by the Clinton "charities."

I see your head in the sand, as usual.
 
Denny Crane said:
My point is that Clinton is entirely relevant because she and her organization are the entire source of the Russia nonsense. .
Click to expand...

Nope. The source of the "Russia nonsense" is
  • Campaign chairman Manafort - Russian operative
  • Rick Gates, deputy campaign mamager - Russian ties
  • Natl Security Advisor Flynn - Russian Operative. Natl security advisor!!! And lying to the FBI about it.
  • George Papadopoulos - Lied also to the FBI about his extensive contacts with Russia
  • Roger Stone - The Trump contact with Julian Assange, Russian puppet and Wikileaks founder.
Ain't no Hillary in sight.

But I am done arguing Hillary with you because it's a thankless circular firing squad. Tried to give you a heads up about that beating the dead horse take of yours but no good deed goes unpunished with you.
 
This is unbelievable watching the unraveling and the defenders defending, like good worker bees.
 
Stevenson said:
Nope. The source of the "Russia nonsense" is
  • Campaign chairman Manafort - Russian operative
  • Rick Gates, deputy campaign mamager - Russian ties
  • Natl Security Advisor Flynn - Russian Operative. Natl security advisor!!! And lying to the FBI about it.
  • George Papadopoulos - Lied also to the FBI about his extensive contacts with Russia
  • Roger Stone - The Trump contact with Julian Assange, Russian puppet and Wikileaks founder.
Ain't no Hillary in sight.

But I am done arguing Hillary with you because it's a thankless circular firing squad. Tried to give you a heads up about that beating the dead horse take of yours but no good deed goes unpunished with you.
Click to expand...

Nope, the source of the Russia nonsense is the Clinton campaign.

Her campaign colluded with Russian spies. Of that there is concrete proof.

Of your claims (being "operatives"), not so much. Repeat them as you will, but they're just not true. If Russian "ties" are all that you care about:

upload_2018-2-8_6-51-38.png

By your "logic" - she must be an operative!
 
Denny Crane said:
By your "logic" - she must be an operative!
Click to expand...

She was an operative - of the US government.

All those Trumpers were operatives, but of something that was not the US government.

barfo
 
barfo said:
She was an operative - of the US government.

All those Trumpers were operatives, but of something that was not the US government.

barfo
Click to expand...
Operatives of the Trump campaign, not of Russia.

Keep coming with the weak sauce.
 
More collusion. Sorry you don't like it, @Stevenson, but like I said, this Russia thing is all a manufacturing of the Clinton campaign. You cannot remove her from the discussion.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/9/john-kerry-associate-played-middleman-hillary-agen/

John Kerry associate played middleman for Hillary agents’ smut and dossier’s Christopher Steele

A former State Department official has confirmed that he played middleman in relaying anti-Trump smut from two Hillary Clinton operatives to dossier writer Christopher Steele who passed it to the FBI.

It is a further thickening of the plot by Democratic Party agents to get unverified dossier material into the news media and the Obama Justice Department before election day Nov. 8.

Jonathan M. Winer, who was former secretary state John Kerry’s special envoy to Libya and his Senate adviser, disclosed the the behind-the-scenes get-Trump operation in a Washington Post op-ed.

Mr. Winer confirmed a redacted Senate report released on Tuesday that said information on candidate Trump flowed between Mr. Steele and Clinton operatives, with Mr. Winer as the middleman.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
You should read the actual article instead of the spin about the article.
Click to expand...

I'm sure there's an email, somewhere, from an NSA guy saying "if this is true, it's great news!"
 
Last edited:
Denny Crane said:
I quoted the first four paragraphs of the article. I bet you didn't know that.
Click to expand...

In this thread?

Denny Crane said:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/us/politics/us-cyberweapons-russia-trump.html

U.S. Spies, Seeking to Retrieve Cyberweapons, Paid Russian Peddling Trump Secrets

(Actual collusion, to hurt the Trump campaign)
Click to expand...

That looks like a link, the headline of the article, and the fake news spin about the article.

Again, did you read the entire article? It's a simple yes or no.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
In this thread?



That looks like a link, the headline of the article, and the fake news spin about the article.

Again, did you read the entire article? It's a simple yes or no.
Click to expand...

So you're saying NTTimes writes fake news spin?

Cool.

Step in the right direction.
 
riverman said:
quoting isn't necessarily reading though....it's cutting and pasting
Click to expand...

I did read it, before I posted the link and the first four paragraphs. I wanted to be sure to cite enough to get the gist of the article.
 
I'm sure there's an email, somewhere, from an NSA guy saying "if this is true, it's great news!"
 
Denny Crane said:
I did read it, before I posted the link and the first four paragraphs. I wanted to be sure to cite enough to get the gist of the article.
Click to expand...
Hence no mention of the cyber weapons they were trying to address...or that the FBI didn't want the Trump trash...that's not why they paid the sleazy Russian food cart gangster..who was offering dirt on Donald..they wanted intel on cyber attacks and methods
 
What? No picture of me in the op?

Thread is worthless......not even reading. Without a picture of me I’m the op this is fake news....
 
Orion Bailey said:
What? No picture of me in the op?

Thread is worthless......not even reading. Without a picture of me I’m the op this is fake news....
Click to expand...

Please provide some. Action photos are best.

For example, stuffing a dead hooker into your trunk is always a crowd pleaser.

barfo
 
SlyPokerDog said:
No Denny, your comment about the article.
Click to expand...

No,dog. The content is fake news. In two ways.

First, the CIA flatly denies the story is true.

Second, their "interest" in dirt on Trump is no more interesting than the interest by Trump Jr. meeting with the Russian lawyer who met with dozens of people around that time, all about reconsidering the Magnitsky Act.

The spin was in the story about the CIA not being interested in the dirt on Trump. A deliberate attempt to spin the story as something different than what Trump Jr. did.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-calls-report-of-100k-payment-to-russian-fictional-trump-tweet/

CIA calls report of $100K payment to Russian "fictional"
 
The man was not invited to the funeral of Barbara Bush, and today it is reported that he will not be invited to the funeral of John McCain.

It takes a really special buffoon to not get invited to the funerals of American icons.
 
Stevenson said:
The man was not invited to the funeral of Barbara Bush, and today it is reported that he will not be invited to the funeral of John McCain.

It takes a really special buffoon to not get invited to the funerals of American icons.
Click to expand...
He's not even invited to HCP's funeral.

I never liked any of the men in the Bush family. Barbara was the only one of them that was tolerable. McCain I don't like at all but respect his military service so.....
 
Stevenson said:
The man was not invited to the funeral of Barbara Bush, and today it is reported that he will not be invited to the funeral of John McCain.

It takes a really special buffoon to not get invited to the funerals of American icons.
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that sitting presidents usually don't go to funerals due to the logistics nightmare of their security. I'm pretty sure he was invited to Barbs, Melania was there.

I'm all for bagging on Trump, I just like to reserve it for the stuff that matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top