When Olshey signed Price, he created a vacuum at PG depth behind a know-nothing rookie, Lillard. Filling that gap is why Karl has received the minutes to display himself.
There is no such gap at forward, so Morrison has hardly played. If the vacuum were at forward instead of PG, we'd be singing the praises of Morrison right now instead of Karl.
Interesting theory, but not supported by facts.
First, Morrison plays shooting guard, not forward. He hasn't really played forward since college. SG is probably our weakest position, with the least depth. Nolan Smith, in theory is a combo guard who can back-up both guard spots. It's true, he does play both guard positions, but he plays them both poorly. Coby Karl's natural position is SG, where he is competing with Morrison for table scraps. But, unlike Smith, Karl can actually effectively run the point for limited stretches.
Second, Morrison has played more than Karl. Morrison has played 57 minutes to Karl's 47. Karl has completely out produced Morrison (EFF = 6.50 vs. EFF = 2.00).
Keep Karl and cut Morrison. Karl can play both guard positions. Morrison's biggest problem is he doesn't really have a position in the NBA. He's far too slow and unathletic to play either SG or SF in the NBA. Plus, Morrison looked totally disinterested last night, like he didn't even want to be in the game. Karl, on the other hand was totally into the game, both when he came in for Lillard in the 1st quarter (GREAT alley-oop to Nic) and late in the game, when the Jazz were cutting into the lead, Karl was urging his teammates to pick up the pace.
Even if Morrison was getting starter minutes, I don't think anyone not related to him would be "singing his praises". He's been that awful.
BNM