LittleAlex
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,824
- Likes
- 54
- Points
- 48
Looking at Detroit's championship roster, most wouldn't have thought they were your typical championship roster.
Roy and Aldridge with a matured Bayless, Batum and Oden may be a legitimate contending starting lineup. Add an additionally seasoned Pendergraph, Cunningham, Webster, and Fernandez off the bench, and that's, for me, a title contender.
Title contenders can have an offensive unit that's either unbalanced or balanced.
Really?
That Detroit team had the best back court duo in the league and the number one post defender in the league. They had a motivated Rasheed Wallace. They had a decent bench.
I think you are selling that team short if you think they didn't have a good roster. That roster was a defensive nightmare for opponents.
Portlands roster as constructed right now isn't.
Sure there may be some sort of line-up alchemy with your proposed roster that makes the sum way better then it's parts. But in the beginning of the season when a lot of guys were around it looked more a science experiment gone horribly wrong.
As I said above, I want to watch a finals game in the Rose Garden. The likelihood that the current roster can get it done is very low. I want KP to do something to make those chances better.
But I am not sure he can because I am not sure such a deal can be made.
If you assume that Oden returns strong and that all the ways the team didn't function at the beginning of the season magically correct themselves then sure maybe that team gets to the finals.
In case you have forgotten, here are the issues the team was unable to address before injuries postponed the resolution:
Roy could not work with Oden.
Neither could LMA.
Webster was horrific off the bench.
Outlaw was having a difficult time with limited minutes.
Blake played a ton.
Miller was ineffective.
Rudy didn't know what his role was.
Neither did Bayless.
What about the above changes next season if they go into the year with the same roster. Wouldn't playing time issues get worse, since Pendergraph and Cunningham would be clamoring for minutes along with the rest?
Last edited:
I have no doubt that there are very good reasons many of you think he'd be the "perfect fit", and I wish that I saw it. But I have this bad feeling about Butler. Which is odd, since I really wanted the VC-for-RLEC rumor last year to be true. But giving up one of our young, defensive-minded wings for him? My take is that we need more perimeter defense, not less...especially for a 2nd option on offense. I mean, it didn't seem that in November we had too few options on offense--we had too many that couldn't be reconciled. And Webster and Batum weren't the problem.