<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Feb 11 2007, 10:59 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>For 360? It got a 6.0 and 2k7 got an 8.3, but the problem with that is,
they are basing it on realism. I really don't think you've ever seen the graphics for it, or for that matter ever even seen the game period. It blows.</div>They are basing it on realism and how fun it is to play. If they based it completely on realism, Live would've got a 1. But since some people love that game because it's so easy they gave it a 6. I remember playing 12 minute quarters in Live last year. You know what the score was? Like 700-30 me. An average Live score on 5 minute quarters is 120-110. In 2k7, my highest ever was 72 on 5 minute quarters. In Live, all you have to do is get 5 feet near the ball-handler and use the Outside Stopper shit to strip the ball every time. 2k7 is hard. You actually have to switch up your defense (2-3 zone, 1-3-1, box and 1, halfcourt trap, fullcourt press, double team), and if you want to strip the ball instead of intercepting it you actually have to time your swipe at the ball, and know which hand to to use. And how many blocks do Inside Stoppers average in Live? Like 10 a game? My career high in total team blocks online was 5 with the Nuggets. In Live, can you even miss a 3 pointer from the corners? 95 times out of 100 yeah. In Live, can you block a jump shot? No sir. In Live, can Inside Scorers ever miss a 3-pointer by doing that hook shot thing (left trigger + X)? Well, if their 3-point rating happened to be a 0, they might miss one once in a while.I can't have fun playing such a crappy game like Live. Realism makes 2k7 fun. And if you're good at 2k7, you can do 360's, alley-oops, crazy crossovers (which YOU control with the iso-motion and triple threat stick, unlike in Live).