what value would you be ok trading Roy for?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

what value would you be ok trading Roy for?

  • only another All-star or young stud

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • a Melo-type package (young guys, expirings, picks)

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • one starter and some cap relief

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • expiring and picks

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • whatever we can get

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • wouldn't trade him

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 1 4.0%

  • Total voters
    25

BrianFromWA

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Editor in Chief
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
26,096
Likes
9,073
Points
113
a) only another All-star or stud young player
b) Carmelo-type package (young players, expirings, picks)
c) a starter and some cap filler
d) expiring contract + picks
e) whatever we can get
f) I would only trade Brandon for Wade, Durant, LBJ
g) other
 
Expirings. I doubt we'd get anything of value for him.
 
I don't want to think about trading Roy but if they do I would rather it be for a Melo type package then anything else.

Probably the best they will be able to get.
 
ANYTHING ... even if it was a backup ballboy. Removing his albatross contract from the team's books for the next five years would be a coup of epic proportions.
 
arnold.jpg


I'm looking at you.
 
Roy has no value whatsoever. In order to trade him we have to trade for another player with an outrageous contract that can't really play. Lot of good that would do us.
 
You wouldn't want to cripple either of those franchises with his contract? What's wrong with you?

It'll end up biting us in the ass, I just know it will.

L*kers always screw us and Roy seems like a L*kers type of player.

Thunder...after they get Oden and Roy to go with Durant and win multiple rings, I'll just run into a brick wall.
 
ANYTHING ... even if it was a backup ballboy. Removing his albatross contract from the team's books for the next five years would be a coup of epic proportions.

^ Correct answer right here ^
 
Roy has no value whatsoever. In order to trade him we have to trade for another player with an outrageous contract that can't really play. Lot of good that would do us.

I've assumed that also; but Rick Bucher claims 6 or 7 teams have called about him. I think there are some that think his knees are not really that bad.
 
Dumping him would be stupid. A Guy playes great for 4 years and you want nothing in return after a bad 25 games. I think it would be smarter to wait and see. Unless we get a young stud back.
 
I've assumed that also; but Rick Bucher claims 6 or 7 teams have called about him. I think there are some that think his knees are not really that bad.

Well, I say they should try and trade him and if they can't, then sue Rick Bucher for 80 million dollars.
 
Dumping him would be stupid. A Guy playes great for 4 years and you want nothing in return after a bad 25 games. I think it would be smarter to wait and see. Unless we get a young stud back.

Nope, it would be genius. I wouldn't care if he played until he was 40 and won 5 rings on another team just to avoid the possiblity of having to live with that contract for a retired player for years.
 
Nope, it would be genius. I wouldn't care if he played until he was 40 and won 5 rings on another team just to avoid the possiblity of having to live with that contract for a retired player for years.

Just to avoid the possibility...........?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top