What your submarine force is doing for you...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BrianFromWA

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Editor in Chief
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
26,096
Likes
9,073
Points
113
Turns out that, once the US got word of the Chinese Navy live-fire exercises being set up, they decided to send their own little message.
Each of the subs listed below are retro-fitted ballistic missile boats that no longer can carry nuclear weapons.
Now, we learn from Time’s Mark Thompson that three former strategic missile submarines converted to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles (SSGNs) surfaced on the same day, June 28, in the Philippine’s Subic Bay, in Pusan, South Korea and at the naval base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Each converted boomer holds up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As Thompson writes, the alarm bells must have sounded that day in Beijing:

“In all, the Chinese military awoke to find as many as 462 new Tomahawks deployed by the U.S. in its neighborhood. “There’s been a decision to bolster our forces in the Pacific,” says Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “There is no doubt that China will stand up and take notice.”

Of course U.S. officials denied that any messaging was intended, but they did make sure news of the SSGN deployments showed up in the Hong Kong based South China Morning Post, on July 4; the same day some analysts expected China to test its DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile.

RIMPAC, the “Rim of the Pacific” war games also began on Wednesday off Hawaii. For all the attention focused on the Levant and the Gulf, its good to see these encouraging signs that at least some in the military understand that the real strategic competition of this century will play out in the Western Pacific.

Read more: http://defensetech.org/2010/07/09/u...filled-subs-to-western-pacific/#ixzz0tnbwu8Ri
Defense.org
 
I think the first goal of the US Navy should be to make Muslim nations feel good about their contributions to maritime navigation.
 
Turns out that, once the US got word of the Chinese Navy live-fire exercises being set up, they decided to send their own little message.
Each of the subs listed below are retro-fitted ballistic missile boats that no longer can carry nuclear weapons.

What does this sort of saber-rattling accomplish in the modern world, Brian? I can see how it would be useful 150 years ago to have a fleet show up suddenly as a show of force, because back then nobody knew exactly how many boats the other guy had and where they were. But nowadays, the Chinese probably know exactly how many subs you have, where they are based, and how long it would take each one to get within range. So what exactly is the point? D'ya think they are scared now?

barfo
 
3 submarines times up to 154 non-nuclear cruise missiles on each sub = 450 targets (mostly buildings) blown up in a country of 1.3 billion people.

Followed by a thousand Chinese ICBMs hitting every American urban area down to a population of 10,000.

In parallel with an American nuclear attack on China. China is much more rural, so afterward there will be a half billion Chinese living and 10-20 million Americans. With the Chinese economy still functioning, but the American nation extinct. And the Chinese army angrily invading and taking over North America.

China says coyly, "Yes...Let's have a nuclear war. We need to cut our population to become more efficient."
 
The Chinese have a few orders of magnitude less than 10000 ICBMs. And, without going too deep into stuff I can't talk about, I'm not too worried about their ability to launch an ICBM without us doing something about it.
 
What does this sort of saber-rattling accomplish in the modern world, Brian? I can see how it would be useful 150 years ago to have a fleet show up suddenly as a show of force, because back then nobody knew exactly how many boats the other guy had and where they were. But nowadays, the Chinese probably know exactly how many subs you have, where they are based, and how long it would take each one to get within range. So what exactly is the point? D'ya think they are scared now?

barfo
I don't think they're scared, but it shows them the point that we start paying attention. It's all diplomacy, more than anything else. They were seeing how far they could go. We showed them we care.

Anyone with a Jane's can see how many subs we have, and they probably have enough intel to know where ours are based out of. They DON'T know where our nuclear subs are. OUR people don't know where our subs are, other than general areas. And seeing 3 of the 4 SSGNs popping up coordinated right before you're doing a frowned-upon live fire exercise isn't fun or face-saving for the other side. And, obtw, those 450 missiles can take out their entire functioning surface Navy a few times over before they get word that we're coming.
 
I don't think they're scared, but it shows them the point that we start paying attention. It's all diplomacy, more than anything else.

Yeah, that makes sense.

They were seeing how far they could go. We showed them we care.

Awww...

Anyone with a Jane's can see how many subs we have, and they probably have enough intel to know where ours are based out of. They DON'T know where our nuclear subs are. OUR people don't know where our subs are, other than general areas. And seeing 3 of the 4 SSGNs popping up coordinated right before you're doing a frowned-upon live fire exercise isn't fun or face-saving for the other side. And, obtw, those 450 missiles can take out their entire functioning surface Navy a few times over before they get word that we're coming.

That was kind of my point. They already know of our military might, so displaying it seems moderately superfluous. But your answers make sense to me.

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top