i really dont understand this obsession with harry giles, as if he wasnt let go by sacramento, meaning they gave up on him
of course, that doesnt mean he cant succeed in the future, but it certainly raises questions about him and you simply cant expect terry stotts to bench nurk for giles, even what stotts did against gsw is risky, he benched nurk for kanter and i commend stotts for that and i hope he does it again if nurk plays bad, but if you give some of the nurks minutes to giles, well, that might cause some trouble
if nurk continues to play bad in the next few games, you bench him for kanter, meaning give kanter some of his minutes and let him finish the game and if nurk doesnt get the message, then you start kanter for a few games and see how nurk reacts... if he reacts like he should, you bring him back in the starting line-up
but i think he wont start kanter instead of nurk (it didnt worked in denver even if jokic is better than nurk)... i think they will be patient with nurk, as they cant afford to piss him off