selloutking
BALL DON'T LIE!
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
- Messages
- 817
- Likes
- 665
- Points
- 93
I well say that I would love to see us draft sabas jr if nothing else just because it wouldn't be right if he went anywhere else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So your ideal line up would be the worst defensive team in NBA history?
Since I have no clue about upcoming draft prospects or what is realistic in free agency.....I will stick with who is on our current roster.....
PG: Lillard / Montero
SG: (no idea) / CJ
SF: Aminu / Crabbe
PF: Vonleh / Davis
C: Legend / Plums
We have such a young, unproven, high-potential roster that if Leonard, Vonleh, Davis, CJ and Aminu all really blossom this year (which isn't crazy aside from Vonleh) we could be really REALY good and surprise a lot of people.
This is where I think NO will find an upgrade by trade deadline and we are going to be a dark horse no one knows about and no one wants to play in the second half as teams wear down, but we are still running on them big time.
No, dame is better than you think
Based on your complete homerism?
"Dope?"How dope would it be if we came out of fucking nowhere and reached the WCF this season? Lol
a year behind? What do you mean?As long as they don't drop off, I think we resign Legend and CJ too, but other than that, I think you might be right. I think CJ and Legend are NO's babies, just like Dame though, so unless something wild happens, I think they stay.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bones? Im dissapointed. Your a year behind. going into 2017-2018, I would like to see this:
Dame/ CJ/Frazier
Durant/CJ
Aminu/Crabbe
Vonleh/Davis
Plumlee/Legend
If Vonleh pans out and Dame is able to accept giving up the #1 option to Durant, I see this as a about a 25% chance of being real and I think would be a serious contender for several years, plus still keep us free for future options as Durant ages.
Jaylen Brown is gonna be the bust of the decade.PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Jaylen Brown
SF: Kevin Durant
PF Ed Davis
C: Meyers Leonard
Jaylen Brown is gonna be the bust of the decade.
And with 20 tears with cap space yall really think KD is a possibility?? Cmon now.
If we wanna get crazy I say trade 2 future 1sts, Vonleh, Plumlee and Aminu to SAC for Cousins, draft Brandon Ingram then sign Al Horford
Lillard / Frazier
Henderson / McCollum
Ingram / Crabbe
Horford / Davis
Cousins / Leonard
we have 2018 through 2022 I believeInteresting that many of you just think we need a stud SG and we will be set in 3 years.
Can we even trade 2 future 1st round picks? Next year's is spoken for. Or is it? ....... since we may or may not make the playoffs. How does that work when there are so many "protections" on a pick?
we have 2018 through 2022 I believe
I think you missed Henderson, unless you think he will be gone. I think him or Crabbe will start at the SG if CJ doesnt win it. I personally dont care if CJ is the best SG on the team, Id rather have him be our 6th man, so toss Henderson as the starting SG?
This is where I think NO will find an upgrade by trade deadline and we are going to be a dark horse no one knows about and no one wants to play in the second half as teams wear down, but we are still running on them big time.
I'm still hoping we can take back Haywood and get a CLE 2018 1st, and I'd be willing to throw in CJ if they took back Ed Davis instead of PlumleeThat makes your trade scenario a little tougher to sell, but it's not a bad offer.
a year behind? What do you mean?

Lillard, Matthews, Batum, Aldridge, Lopez.
Sigh...
I like two!Meaning, I think we can accomplish what you want in a year sooner. You say three years, I say two.![]()
Lillard, Matthews, Batum, Aldridge, Lopez.
Sigh...
Actually at best that was probably a fourth seed . . . but the point stands, they weren't going to win shit.In reality this lineup was a poor man's Golden State Warriors.
I hate the Neil didn't deal LMA in 2013 but the management hitting the reset button shouldn't come at a surprise. At best, this was a 6-8th seed team.
That's bollocks. This lineup, if fully healthy, would give Golden State all they could handle, especially with Afflalo fully in the mix as a 6th man instead of being unceremoniously dumped into the starting lineup.In reality this lineup was a poor man's Golden State Warriors.
I hate the Neil didn't deal LMA in 2013 but the management hitting the reset button shouldn't come at a surprise. At best, this was a 6-8th seed team.
Starter or not, Afflalo played like shit. And what makes you think the Blazers out of all the teams in the West would have given the Dubs "all they could handle?" There's nothing wrong with saying that, but without some supporting evidence to back it up, why would I believe that?That's bollocks. This lineup, if fully healthy, would give Golden State all they could handle, especially with Afflalo fully in the mix as a 6th man instead of being unceremoniously dumped into the starting lineup.
We were one of what, three or four teams in the league who ranked in the top ten in both offense and defense. We were on pace for 55+ wins, and I firmly believe that the addition of Afflalo would have pushed that number even higher once all was said and done.Starter or not, Afflalo played like shit. And what makes you think the Blazers out of all the teams in the West would have given the Dubs "all they could handle?" There's nothing wrong with saying that, but without some supporting evidence to back it up, why would I believe that?
Starter or not, Afflalo played like shit. And what makes you think the Blazers out of all the teams in the West would have given the Dubs "all they could handle?" There's nothing wrong with saying that, but without some supporting evidence to back it up, why would I believe that?
No team is "fully healthy" at the end of the season and counting on that is nothing but wish-casting. Even when they were fully healthy the year before the best they could manage was squeaking past the Rockets. This wasn't a radically improved team and certainly not a team the Warriors would have had trouble with - it's not like the Blazers managed to beat them earlier in the year when they were at full health.
