santeesioux
Just keep on scrolling by
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 10,752
- Likes
- 5,333
- Points
- 113
Hopefully they're at least past the point of thinking an old ass player like Tyson Chandler is going to be worth going after at this point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's no such thing as a long term plan, only a process/methodology/set of principles.
My bet is they trade for a couple draft picks and expiring contracts while unloading some bad contracts. Trying AGAIN for a fast rebuild around Dame and CJ.Always a deal coming soon! ;-)
but I hope they actually do something. this team is painful to watch.
I agree. Things change in a hurry. No one knows that more than Blazer fans. (See Walton, Roy, and Oden)
2-3 years is about has far ahead as you can plan. But the basics are there....keep your draft picks.... at least until draft day.
Would you go deep into the luxury tax to keep him? Is he worth paying him effectively 30 million a year on a sub .500 team? The alternative sucks too; we gave up a 1st round pick for him, so if he walks that's effectively no return on yet another pick.
Short of Olshey hypnotizing another GM and unloading a truck-load of hot garbage before the deadline, I think Plumlee has to be moved, otherwise it's just another wasted asset Olshey failed to capitalize on (or just as bad, overpays him for not enough production to warrant his cost).
That feels very, very, VEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRYYYYYYY, unlikely.The only way it would be worth it to pay Plumlee and go into LT is to go after win now guys and make this team a contender next year. If you are going to go over the tax, it better be to win.
Oh I agree on Plums' value to the team. Not sure 14 mil is realistic for a legit starting big.
Guys like Biyombo, Mozgov, and Ian Mahinmi got 16-18 mil last year.
If you climb up to that range for Plums (and don't clear space), you're gonna be in cap/lux tax hell for the near future and even fewer opportunities to right the ship.
Right now, due to lack of long term planning, the Blazers budget is bankrupt, and will be for a few more seasons.
I think New Orleans would love him passing to Davis in the post....I think we're going to see a decrease from the spending orgy we saw last offseason. Do the teams with the cap space to give Plumlee a $16-18mill offer even need or want him?
I think New Orleans would love him passing to Davis in the post....
Would you go deep into the luxury tax to keep him? Is he worth paying him effectively 30 million a year on a sub .500 team? The alternative sucks too; we gave up a 1st round pick for him, so if he walks that's effectively no return on yet another pick.
Short of Olshey hypnotizing another GM and unloading a truck-load of hot garbage before the deadline, I think Plumlee has to be moved, otherwise it's just another wasted asset Olshey failed to capitalize on (or just as bad, overpays him for not enough production to warrant his cost).
Any other teams that could use Plumlee's services? Any contending teams? He might be a good fit in Houston's uptempo offense?I think New Orleans would love him passing to Davis in the post....
Notice how many ex Blazers are on that list...TRob, Felton, Babbitt....Brian Roberts..Patty Mills2017 expiring contracts. http://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents/
Any other teams that could use Plumlee's services? Any contending teams? He might be a good fit in Houston's uptempo offense?
Oh man, you are right, he would probably be utilized really well there. Plumlee for LA? haSan Antonio. Imagine Plumlee under Pop. He'd probably be an all star. Plumlee is worth keeping, he does a lot of good things, and always plays his ass off.
I go back and forth on what Plumlee's ideal role might be. Super-sub center who can dribble, pass and do a little bit of everything (except shoot), or a middling starter who's not quite big enough to adequately anchor a team's defense. Whatever the case, I can see somebody running out of options (like Neil did) and throwing an ass-load of money at him on about day 5 or 6 of free agency.I'm curious to see if any teams offer Plumlee a starter's salary in free agency. He has such a peculiar game that it is hard to imagine any teams thinking of him as their missing piece and overpaying him.
and who is gonna take that piece of garbage contract that Meyers has?I would move other players before Plumlee. If it's a choice between Meyers or Plums I would keep Plums.
yep, sounds so "easy" to move this guy or that but we have three very bad, large contracts that are not IMO going to be "easy" to moveI agree. I just have serious doubts about how easily moved Meyers, Crabbe, and or Turner are going to be and what it would cost the Blazers for some team to take them off of their hands.
and who is gonna take that piece of garbage contract that Meyers has?
yep, sounds so "easy" to move this guy or that but we have three very bad, large contracts that are not IMO going to be "easy" to move
