Politics White Nationalist Rally turns to violence and terrorism

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
ALEX JONES CALLS CHARLOTTESVILLE VIOLENCE A FALSE FLAG, BECAUSE ALTERNATIVE FACTS ARE STILL A THING

A false flag is a diversionary tactic employed in battle at sea. Today, it most commonly refers to a government staging a terrorist attack it subsequently uses to malign and possibly prosecute forces hostile to the establishment. The notion of pervasive “false flags” has been popularized by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, founder of Infowars. According to Jones, the attacks of 9/11 were a false flags, as was the murder of 20 children at the Sandy Hook elementary school in 2012.

Jones presented his depressingly predictable explanation of what transpired in Charlottesville in a video posted on Saturday. “EXCLUSIVE: Virginia Riots Staged To Bring In Martial Law, Ban Conservative Gatherings,” the headline read. The video was an hour-long diatribe against some of Jones’s favorite targets, including liberal philanthropist George Soros, Black Lives Matter, globalists, elitists, the Democrats, the Republicans and anarchists, among many others. However, Jones failed to provide even remotely compelling evidence that anyone of these forces was directly responsible for the weekend’s violence (Fields killed one woman with his car, while two Virginia State Police officers died when their helicopter crashed en route to Charlottesville).

At one point, Jones appeared to suggest that the Southern Poverty Law Center was responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Jones also claimed that the media had failed to cover widespread assaults on families of Trump supporters in Washington, D.C., during January’s presidential inauguration.



http://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-calls-charlottesville-violence-false-flag-650152
 
Cippy91 said:
At the same time all the time I have been here it has felt like some members are just protected over others. I just don't like that, one bit.
Click to expand...

Well first off, I was invited to your pity party, so I believe I should be able to comment on this. You definitely come at people when they don't agree with you. ANd you do it very aggressively. We try not to do that here on my forum.
As far as some getting preferential treatment when it comes to getting their posts edited or deleted, don't let Denny's lapdog tell you he has ever edited anything I have posted, not true. Sly knows that in the contract I have with Denny to post here for him, nothing I post can be touched.
You can understand why I get away with things that, well, people like you can't though right, it's pretty obvious. Send me a proivate message if you still have trouble grasping this son.
 
HCP said:
Well first off, I was invited to your pity party, so I believe I should be able to comment on this. You definitely come at people when they don't agree with you. ANd you do it very aggressively. We try not to do that here on my forum.
As far as some getting preferential treatment when it comes to getting their posts edited or deleted, don't let Denny's lapdog tell you he has ever edited anything I have posted, not true. Sly knows that in the contract I have with Denny to post here for him, nothing I post can be touched.
You can understand why I get away with things that, well, people like you can't though right, it's pretty obvious. Send me a proivate message if you still have trouble grasping this son.
Click to expand...

Who are you again?
 
Did anyone participate in the protests around the country that were protesting the result of the counter protesters protesting the original protest?
 
EL PRESIDENTE said:
Did anyone participate in the protests around the country that were protesting the result of the counter protesters protesting the original protest?
Click to expand...
I'm protesting your anti-protest of the non-protesting of the protester's protesters.
 
HCP said:
Well first off, I was invited to your pity party, so I believe I should be able to comment on this. You definitely come at people when they don't agree with you. ANd you do it very aggressively. We try not to do that here on my forum.
As far as some getting preferential treatment when it comes to getting their posts edited or deleted, don't let Denny's lapdog tell you he has ever edited anything I have posted, not true. Sly knows that in the contract I have with Denny to post here for him, nothing I post can be touched.
You can understand why I get away with things that, well, people like you can't though right, it's pretty obvious. Send me a proivate message if you still have trouble grasping this son.
Click to expand...
rook
 
Further said:
I think it's important to give it attention and show the imagery so people realize the real state of white nationalists. It was in one of the threads here a few months back where there were posters saying there really aren't any white nationalists and that it's just one here or there. That the rallies have only 8 people showing up. That it's not a really problem, that Nazi's in America don't really exist. Well, they do. And the problem has gotten worse and the assholes emboldened by Trump and his unwillingness quickly condemn such folk.

I am not claiming that most Trump supporters are Nazi's, I don't believe that to be the case, but I do think many have been willing to turn a blind eye to so many "White Nationalists" supporting Trump and to Trump not telling them he doesn't want their support. McCain, Obama and Bush all told supporters at some point that they were not welcomed when they said outrageous things about "others". Trump has spoken out only a couple times, and only once a shit-storm ensued from his lack of initial response. And always with caveats.

These images create indelibility. That matters.
Click to expand...
Politicians lie
 
This country has some very angry disturbed people who magnetize into hate groups. If they could torture innocent beings, they would.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
DHDYO5FXsAIpUyi.jpg
Click to expand...
Graphic picture. I also wonder what the decal on the tail gate states. "...to help a child" The lower right legs picture must be the woman who was killed.
 
Minstrel said:
Trust our resident "a pox on both their houses, I'm an independent" libertarian to bring out the "both sides were wrong, the neo Nazis and the people protesting the neo Nazis" guns.
Click to expand...

Trump's no libertarian.
 
Nikolokolus said:
The driver committed a politically motivated act of murder. How hard is this to grasp?
Click to expand...

He wasn't trying to get the government to do something, like remove troops from his holy land or free POWs.

If protesting a statue's existence or removal is terrorism, then it would be terrorism to protest a cross on public land. See how that works?

It may be a hate crime. But even then, it's not like he drove his car into a crowd of black people or jews or some other ethnicity he hates.

I'm not at all defending the fuck. Just that misusing terms like terrorism is a dangerous slippery slope. Very few of the facts surrounding his motive and any planning of this is known.
 
Last edited:
GoDaddy bans neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer


Internet hosting provider GoDaddy will ban The Daily Stormer after the prominent neo-Nazi website published an article that attacked the victim of Saturday's car-ramming attack at a protest in Charlottesville.

"We informed The Daily Stormer that they have 24 hours to move the domain to another provider, as they have violated our terms of service," the company said in a tweet to Amy Siskind, the president of women's advocacy group The New Agenda.

Siskind had called out the company for hosting the neo-Nazi website after it published an article to attack the victim of Saturday's attack. Siskind's call for the website to be taken down received more than 3,000 retweets in less than two hours.

In the article, Daily Stormer founder and editor Andrew Anglin called victim Heather Heyer a "fat, childless 32-year-old slut." Sunday's article was widely condemned on social media and the link received more than 156,000 shares on Facebook alone.

"Despite feigned outrage by the media, most people are glad she is dead, as she is the definition of uselessness," Anglin wrote. "A 32-year-old woman without children is a burden on society and has no value. .. Childless women are black hole vortexes of public money and energy."

With no evidence, Anglin also condemned Heyer as a "child murderer," saying her age suggested that she likely underwent multiple abortions. He further attacked her weight and, without evidence, claimed that Heyer sought the "complete abolition of the white race."

"Whatever you think of the driver, it is clear that his actions saved us a lot of money," Anglin said, referring to murder suspect James Fields. "It appears that road rage got the best of him," he added, calling Fields a "hardcore player."

The Daily Stormer website was launched in 2013 and is roughly estimated to rank as the 4,483rd most-visited website in the United States, according to Alexa.com, which analyzes internet traffic. It ranks as the 12,711th most-visited website worldwide.

http://bnonews.com/news/index.php/news/id6332



 
SlyPokerDog said:
GoDaddy bans neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer


Internet hosting provider GoDaddy will ban The Daily Stormer after the prominent neo-Nazi website published an article that attacked the victim of Saturday's car-ramming attack at a protest in Charlottesville.

"We informed The Daily Stormer that they have 24 hours to move the domain to another provider, as they have violated our terms of service," the company said in a tweet to Amy Siskind, the president of women's advocacy group The New Agenda.

Siskind had called out the company for hosting the neo-Nazi website after it published an article to attack the victim of Saturday's attack. Siskind's call for the website to be taken down received more than 3,000 retweets in less than two hours.

In the article, Daily Stormer founder and editor Andrew Anglin called victim Heather Heyer a "fat, childless 32-year-old slut." Sunday's article was widely condemned on social media and the link received more than 156,000 shares on Facebook alone.

"Despite feigned outrage by the media, most people are glad she is dead, as she is the definition of uselessness," Anglin wrote. "A 32-year-old woman without children is a burden on society and has no value. .. Childless women are black hole vortexes of public money and energy."

With no evidence, Anglin also condemned Heyer as a "child murderer," saying her age suggested that she likely underwent multiple abortions. He further attacked her weight and, without evidence, claimed that Heyer sought the "complete abolition of the white race."

"Whatever you think of the driver, it is clear that his actions saved us a lot of money," Anglin said, referring to murder suspect James Fields. "It appears that road rage got the best of him," he added, calling Fields a "hardcore player."

The Daily Stormer website was launched in 2013 and is roughly estimated to rank as the 4,483rd most-visited website in the United States, according to Alexa.com, which analyzes internet traffic. It ranks as the 12,711th most-visited website worldwide.

http://bnonews.com/news/index.php/news/id6332


Click to expand...

kUwZ7NY.png
 
Denny Crane said:
He wasn't trying to get the government to do something, like remove troops from his holy land or free POWs.

If protesting a statue's existence or removal is terrorism, then it would be terrorism to protest a cross on public land. See how that works?

It may be a hate crime. But even then, it's not like he drove his car into a crowd of black people or jews or some other ethnicity he hates.

I'm not at all defending the fuck. Just that misusing terms like terrorism is a dangerous slippery slope. Very few of the facts surrounding his motive and any planning of this is known.
Click to expand...

I'm not talking about the protest, I'm talking about the driver that chose to drive his car through a crowd for a political end. Politically motivated slayings directed at civilian populations to my recollection have usually been pretty easy to call "terrorism," whether it was the Unibomber, the Weather Underground, the IRA, or Timothy McVeigh. Motivated by high-minded, low-minded, or trivial goals, they all had one thing in common; kill or injure people to send a message to their political rivals, be it governments or other citizens.

There's a really easy test here: If this had been a Muslim driving through a crowd of people would we be parsing the phrase "terrorism" so finely? There is no slippery slope here, because I'm not calling the act of protesting an act of terrorism, I'm very narrowly focused on the politically motivated slaying, which appears to be directed at preventing taking down a statue of Robert E. Lee -- a fairly trivial political end, but a political end nonetheless.
 
Nikolokolus said:
I'm not talking about the protest, I'm talking about the driver that chose to drive his car through a crowd for a political end. Politically motivated slayings directed at civilian populations to my recollection have usually been pretty easy to call "terrorism," whether it was the Unibomber, the Weather Underground, the IRA, or Timothy McVeigh. Motivated by high-minded, low-minded, or trivial goals, they all had one thing in common; kill or injure people to send a message to their political rivals, be it governments or other citizens.

There's a really easy test here: If this had been a Muslim driving through a crowd of people would we be parsing the phrase "terrorism" so finely? There is no slippery slope here, because I'm not calling the act of protesting an act of terrorism, I'm very narrowly focused on the politically motivated slaying, which appears to be directed at preventing taking down a statue of Robert E. Lee -- a fairly trivial political end, but a political end nonetheless.
Click to expand...

Well said.
 
Nikolokolus said:
I'm not talking about the protest, I'm talking about the driver that chose to drive his car through a crowd for a political end. Politically motivated slayings directed at civilian populations to my recollection have usually been pretty easy to call "terrorism," whether it was the Unibomber, the Weather Underground, the IRA, or Timothy McVeigh. Motivated by high-minded, low-minded, or trivial goals, they all had one thing in common; kill or injure people to send a message to their political rivals, be it governments or other citizens.

There's a really easy test here: If this had been a Muslim driving through a crowd of people would we be parsing the phrase "terrorism" so finely? There is no slippery slope here, because I'm not calling the act of protesting an act of terrorism, I'm very narrowly focused on the politically motivated slaying, which appears to be directed at preventing taking down a statue of Robert E. Lee -- a fairly trivial political end, but a political end nonetheless.
Click to expand...

Those things you mention are premeditated acts, and with definite aims to affect policy.

This one you have to prove it's beyond road rage, and I haven't seen any of that.

It's not like he sought out innocent people minding their own business. There were fisticuffs and other acts of violence going on already. He didn't target black people or jews or whatever group these fucks say they hate.

They're even saying on CNN (who generally have their panties in a bunch over nothing) that the domestic terrorism rap is hard to claim on this. The civil rights investigation is the way to go, and calling it a hate crime fits. It gets the guy the death penalty, too.

As for a Muslim, if he yells pro ISIS statements or has ties to ISIS (or whatever group), then you have domestic terrorism. In previous cases where these types have driven trucks (or whatever) into crowds of innocent people: 1) they planned ahead of time, renting the trucks, 2) there was no protest/counterprotest - the victims were truly innocent bystanders.

You bet, we have to protect Muslims who may commit crimes that have nothing to do with political ideology.
 
Last edited:
stampedehero said:
This country has some very angry disturbed people who magnetize into hate groups. If they could torture innocent beings, they would.
Click to expand...
I believe that our society is at a point of no return. The whole thing must crumble into war, death and chaos in order for it to get fixed. The next thing coming is people advocating on what you can and can't say or do beyond what is already protected. Simply replacing Trump will be nothing more than a band-aid. And i'm talking about if someone on the Left or the Right eventually replaces him.

Internet access is very quickly radicalizing parties on both sides and growing a divide. Its extremely destructive to society.

People have access to "information" (which is more than likely propoganda) in a manner they could never get before. Nefarious plans can be made, people feel that they need to make their opinions known to all of their friends and people who disagree with them are no longer their friends. News can be fabricated, opinions can be muted on social media channels, certain results can be tailored either by your choosing or by the choice of a company.

And what it all comes down to is mental masturbation. You getting a "win" over someone who has an opposing view. Oh, your candidate lost? Hahah, lets make a video of the candidate's supporter's crying! Its a very complex entity and it could be the fall of our society.
 
Proof that the car driving into the crowd was a deep state operation that was funded by George Soros according to the /The_Donald on Reddit.

tl/dr: According to DMV records the car has a sunroof. The car in the video and pictures has no sunroof.

lo09leymrmfz.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top