I only used one stat from last season...Portland's FGA/game average of 85.4. Now, the Blazers ranked 25th in FGA so that's on the low side. The median was 88.5 and that's only 3 more attempts a game; that really doesn't change the math in any significant way. Utah was 10th in FGA at 89.8 which was only 4.5 more shots a game. In other words, last year is an appropriate gauge for what is realistic in terms of average available FGA/game
now obviously, players get injured and miss games. Trades can happen. Players can be waived and others signed. So going strictly by team FGA vs the sum of players' FGA won't match. Last season, the sum of the rotation players was in the 75-80 range, when I do a quick addition in my head. But again, that still suggests that some of the projections people are making seem way off. If Ant and Ayton average a combined 37 FGA, that would leave 43-47, or so, for Grant-Scoot-Brogdon-Sharpe-Thybulle-Williams and whichever forward climbs to the top of the Walker/Camara/Knox/Murray/Rupert quintet. Seems like a lot of guys to share what may be 50 shots, at most
I'm also thinking people are expecting the Blazers to run a lot more and get up more shots. That may happen but in order for it to do so, the Blazers will have to rebound well...can't run without the ball...and I think rebounding may be a challenge for this year's team