Who to draft?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

<-=*PdX*=->

RCTID
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
1,057
Likes
158
Points
63
I was reading the espn insider mock draft and they had us taking the VCM SF and I decided to look at who was "taken" after us and I saw Quincy Pondexter. He fits the profile of being a 4 year college player and according to the mock is a "jumpshot away from being a star". He is from UW and I think would be a good choice for us if he is available. Plus, its not like we don't have the time or depth. We would be able to let him mature over a few years and not need a high impact immediately. Who else have you guys thought about?
 
I was reading the espn insider mock draft and they had us taking the VCM SF and I decided to look at who was "taken" after us and I saw Quincy Pondexter. He fits the profile of being a 4 year college player and according to the mock is a "jumpshot away from being a star". He is from UW and I think would be a good choice for us if he is available. Plus, its not like we don't have the time or depth. We would be able to let him mature over a few years and not need a high impact immediately. Who else have you guys thought about?

First off, I'm not so sure our depth is all that great, and secondly, Pon is already 22; you don't draft seniors for their untapped potential, you draft them for what they can give you immediately. In this case, that would defense, slashing and hustle, with maybe the outside chance he develops into a good shooter. But I do like him.

Other guys I think the Blazers will take a look at are Dominique Jones, Paul George, Kevin Seraphin, Alabi (if he's still on the board) and maybe Miroslav Raduljica in the first round. it all depends on whether or not they stand pat with their 22nd and 44th picks though.
 
If we stay at #22 or trade up slightly to around #15-ish, I'd target Avery Bradley. Only a freshman PG/SG he's probably the best defensive PG in the draft. He's also Jerryd Bayless-athletic. A projected mid-first rounder and could sneak into the late lotto.

[video=youtube;sYJVTePSMYw]
 
Last edited:
Fez, you really think Bradley is going that high? which mock did you see him in the late lotto or mid first? Everything I've read that I find remotely reputable has him late first (draftexpress at 28th, ESPN 25th, and NBAdraft.net at 22nd).
 
Just food for thought - we pick 22nd. Here are the PGs available at or past that spot in recent drafts:

Code:
2009
25.	Thunder		Rodrigue Beaubois	PG
34.	Nuggets		Sergio Llull		PG (playing very well for Real Madrid)
42.	Lakers		Patrick Beverley	PG (guarded Ricky Rubio very well for Olympiakos)
53.	Spurs		Nando De Colo		PG (best player on Victor Claver's team)

2008:
26.  San Antonio        George Hill - PG  
34.  Minnesota           Mario Chalmers  - PG
45.  San Antonio        Goran Dragic  - PG

2007:
26. Houston             Aaron Brooks
30. Philadelphia        Petteri Koponen
56. Milwaukee           Ramon Sessions

2006:
24. Memphis             Kyle Lowry
25. Cleveland           Shannon Brown
26. LA Lakers           Jordan Farmar
27. Phoenix             Sergio Rodriguez
42. Cleveland           Daniel GIbson

2005:
22. Denver              Jarrett Jack

Those are just the PGs. There are a TON of useful players at other positions, too. Check them out for yourself.
 
Cahd Ford's draft blog

an excerpt on a couple of guys in that 22nd pick range (draftexpress currently has us slotted to take George)

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/blog?name=nba_draft

Paul George, G/F, Fresno State
If you want the upside sleeper of the first round, look no further than George. He is a 6-foot-8 wing whose silky smooth play has drawn comparisons to everyone from Tracy McGrady to Wilson Chandler.

George is closer to Chandler than McGrady at the moment, but it's clear that he's the type of player who could explode with a little coaching. He's been in the gym with former NBA big man Don MacLean for the past three weeks working on the little things that separate the good wings from the great wings. Specifically, he's working on creating his own shot -- ball handling, first step and getting separation off the dribble.

In the workout we saw, George was terrific. He showed deep range on his jump shot, exploded to the rim and had terrific quickness. Scouts have had questions about his consistency and toughness. They've also worried about his love affair with the 3-pointer. But it was also clear that he was rarely pushed at Fresno State.

In this environment, playing alongside other NBA prospects, he looked much sharper and more focused. He needs to get stronger and improve his motor (something he admitted to me when we chatted) but MacLean told me George has been a sponge since coming into the gym.

George believes he may be more of a 2-guard than a 3. Some NBA teams agree. In fact his first workout is in San Antonio on Thursday. His workout partner: Kansas shooting guard Xavier Henry.

Damion James, F, Texas
Last year at this time, nearly every NBA team had written off James. After an unimpressive combine in Chicago, James withdrew from the draft and most NBA teams penciled him as a second-rounder in 2010.

But James has been gaining momentum all year. NBA teams loved his toughness, motor and athleticism. But they questioned what position he would play in the NBA. James has worked hard on his perimeter skills and this year became a much more convincing small forward.

James was in for his first day with MacLean, but he was already in terrific shape. He's got big hands, terrific strength and attacks every drill like he's trying to kill. In one drill, during which MacLean had players moving from box to box and dunking each time they came to the rim, James nearly ripped the rim from the backboard on every play.

While James isn't going to show the skill of a player like George in this type of setting, what he does show is plenty of fire. I think it's going to be a terrific selling point for him in the draft. He could rise in a way similar to what Tyler Hansbrough did in last year's draft. You can't teach toughness, motor and NBA readiness. With so many question marks in this draft, James is one of the few guys who you know, right out of the gate, what you are and aren't getting. By June, he could end up in the late lottery.
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Interesting. I wish both mentioned something about defense, because, if there's one thing we need more of, it's defense. Somebody who's been mentioned on this board that people on this board should have seen a lot of is Quincy Pondexter. He sounds the same mold as the people mentioned, only supposedly he's a lockdown multi-positional defender. AND he's from Roy's alma mater. Comments on him?
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Interesting. I wish both mentioned something about defense, because, if there's one thing we need more of, it's defense. Somebody who's been mentioned on this board that people on this board should have seen a lot of is Quincy Pondexter. He sounds the same mold as the people mentioned, only supposedly he's a lockdown multi-positional defender. AND he's from Roy's alma mater. Comments on him?

Ford didn't have anything to say about Pondexter in this article, but you're right Pon is a very good defender and from the few times I watched him the past couple of years and his work in the tournament I think it'll translate fairly well to the next level.

In any case, here's what Jonathan Givony has to say about James' defense (whose scouting abilities I trust a great deal more than Chad Ford's)

Despite being knocked for most of his career for not being a very good defender, it was difficult to find much evidence of that from the tape we took in. Sporting a terrific 7-1 wingspan, a chiseled frame and standing nearly 6-8 in shoes, James has all the physical tools needed to be an excellent defender, especially when you consider his terrific toughness and aggressiveness.

That clearly manifests itself on the court as well, as he is very active, uses his body extremely effectively, does a good job of utilizing his length to contest shots, and gets his hands on a ton of loose balls. James is a playmaker on the defensive end, getting in the passing lanes on a regular basis, blocking shots at a good rate, and doing a great job on the defensive glass. His lateral quickness on the perimeter may not be stellar, but it looks more than adequate for the NBA level. In fact, he seemed to do a better job guarding the perimeter from the film we saw than in the post, where his lack of size can get exposed at times.

George I believe is seen as being a somewhat weak defender with effort and focus issues.

As a defender, George has all the tools to be very solid on this side of the ball, but hasn’t fully put it all together just yet. He comes out of his stance too often and is unaware at times of his opponent’s strengths – backing off of a shooter or caroling a driver, suggesting he needs to pay more attention to scouting reports. Despite that, his length, anticipatory skills and quick hands have made George one of the nation’s leaders in steals, collecting over 2 a game.
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

I hope we don't take somebody with a "questionable motor". At this point, for this team, I'll take somebody with slightly less skill with a big "motor".
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Assuming the team goes for a wing - there are 2 holes that need to be filled, and finding a player at 22 who can fill both is going to be tough.

A) The team could really use another solid perimeter defender.

B) The team needs someone to replace Outlaw. It was supposed to be Rudy, but we all saw how well that worked out.

Pondexter looks like he can fill role A, but does he have the shooting touch to fill B?
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

This guy sounds VERY intriguing. (And Givony didn't even mention the Thunder's French MVP - Serge Ibaka.)

April 29; Portland, Oregon; Game 6 of the Western Conference Quarterfinals. 6-8 small forward Nicolas Batum hounds Steve Nash, arguably the best point guard in NBA history, into a miserable 10-point, 6-assist, 7-turnover performance.

April 29; San Antonio, Texas; Game 6 of the Western Conference Quarterfinals. 6-2 combo guard Rodrigue Beaubois comes off the bench to score 16 points in 21 minutes and spark the Mavericks to overcome an 11-point deficit – a lift that gives Dallas a chance to win the game and force a seventh game.

What do these players have in common? Both are French; both are super-athletic, physical specimens at their position; and both were severely undervalued in their respective draft classes.

The thought of whiffing on Beaubois and Batum in consecutive years in the late portion of the first round has to be keeping NBA teams up at night, watching film of the next great French athlete, determined not to make the same mistake again.

Enter 6-10, 20-year-old big man Kevin Seraphin.

Seraphin is not a perimeter player like his future French national teammates, but he is similarly gifted from a physical standpoint, and he just happens to be represented by the same agent, Bouna Ndiaye....

Seraphin has until June 14 to decide whether to keep his name in the draft or pull out and become automatically eligible next year. The NBA teams evaluating him will need to decide how much they think he can improve in the next year or two, and whether being patient and drafting him now (in the late teens to early 20s portion of the first round) will get them good value down the road. We’re talking about a player who is still in a very early stage of his development. If he improves as much as expected, he could very well work his way into the lottery next season. On certain NBA teams’ draft boards, he could already be there right now.

The final call will likely be made based on the types of organizations showing interest. His agent Ndiaye has done a good job in recent years of steering clients to places he thinks they can develop -- such as Portland, Dallas and San Antonio -- and he’ll probably take a similar route this time around with Seraphin.

From what Ndiaye told us in Paris this week, he’s feeling increasingly comfortable with the information he’s receiving from NBA teams in terms of keeping Seraphin’s name in the draft.
 
Last edited:
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

You win. But nobody has come forward to say that they've seen him play and think X about him. Surely plenty of people on this board watched a ton of UW games?
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Is it worth merging this thread with the "Who to draft" one into a mega draft thread? And maybe sticky-ing it?
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

No really? I could have sworn it was spelled Cahd.
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Kevin Seraphin is interesting. A legit 6'11" and athletic. His ceiling, IMO, is Nene.

[video=youtube;uGtkDU_HvaI]

(#11)

Seraphin has everything you could ask for in terms of measureables. He stands 6’10” without shoes, with a 7’3” wingspan. Weighing 263 pounds, Seraphin has a great body with chiseled arms, thick legs, and great all-around strength. In transition, he runs the floor like a guard, and often finishes the break with a thunderous dunk.
- Draft Express
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

I hope we don't take somebody with a "questionable motor". At this point, for this team, I'll take somebody with slightly less skill with a big "motor".

Interesting. I'm the opposite. We drafted a couple of high-motor guys last year in Cunningham and Pendergraph, and neither of them were able to help us.

I'd rather take a chance with a potential difference-maker than try to draft more role players.

Ed O.
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

You win. But nobody has come forward to say that they've seen him play and think X about him. Surely plenty of people on this board watched a ton of UW games?

Um..(cough)...excuse me, sir... :)
http://sportstwo.com/threads/157824...-season/page2?highlight=brianfromwa+pondexter post 50
http://sportstwo.com/threads/158966-Blazers-hold-draft-workout?highlight=brianfromwa+pondexter post 11

I haven't watched a ton---maybe 6 times...and listened to some on the radio. I've seen him play the last 4 years, and he's improved steadily (not like Roy's explosion his senior year). He's a little bit like Travis circa 2006 on the offensive end--he's pretty good in transition, can hit the 15-footer, but don't trust him outside. He also has the size and mentality to beast on the offensive boards. But he's heady and a stud athlete on the D end, and that's where he's going to make his NBA money from.

If you're looking for a Travis replacement as a reserve gunner (I'm not, but I understand the thinking) then Pondexter isn't it. He's not going to be a great shooter or distributor, but he'll give you more from the reserve 3/4 than Dante did, just b/c he has better handles and can attack the hoop more.
 
If we stay at #22 or trade up slightly to around #15-ish, I'd target Avery Bradley. Only a freshman PG/SG he's probably the best defensive PG in the draft. He's also Jerryd Bayless-athletic. A projected mid-first rounder and could sneak into the late lotto.
bradley didn't show any pg skills at texas and wore down as the shorter college season went along. he also didn't really finish well at the rim and became very reliant on jumpers that fell less and less often as the season progressed. also, while he was a good defender, i think him getting that reputation very early on led to him definitely being overrated on that side of the ball at the end of the year.

he could potentially be a very good "pg" next to roy playing lockdown defense and being able to hit jumpers but watching him a lot this year i'm not very confident at all that he'll reach that potential and i think he's at least a couple of years away from really contributing.
 
Last edited:
I think the team needs to either look for a backcourt player or a center...and I don't see any SF prospects that could possibly be around #22 that look too good to pass up...though I am intrigued by Gordon Hayward...

If you could use Rudy to trade up to get a guy like Greg Monroe, maybe Cole Aldirch or Ekpe Udoh then they should certainly consider it....Solomon Alabi is possibly another player to look at....down the road...you hope that Oden stays healthy but I think you have to take precautions and have a back up big in the wings waiting when Camby and (likely) Przybilla are gone two years from now...start grooming one now...

If they don't go for a big, then they need to look for a scoring guard to back up or potentially down the road play alongside Roy...I just can't see Rudy coming back, and there are some intriguing guards out there to take a look at....guys like Willie Warren, Eric Bledsoe, James Anderson, Avery Bradley, Xavier Henry...maybe Elliot Williams and Quincy Pondexter....

I'd rather see the team try to identify an "immediate impact" scorer off the bench via free agency...be that at SG or SF...guys like Anthony Morrow, Al Harrington, Wesley Matthews, Mike Miller, Luke Ridnour or Randy Foye
 
Last edited:
Well all I can say right now is who not to draft. Greg Monroe. The guy has motor issues. I saw him play several times this year and he seemed disinterested at best. He definitly has skills. No motor to back them up though.
 
If we trade up I like Donatas Motiejunas -- He's polished on the offensive end, athletic, and has range out to the three point line. At nearly 7'2" in shoes, he really intrigues me.
 
Well all I can say right now is who not to draft. Greg Monroe. The guy has motor issues. I saw him play several times this year and he seemed disinterested at best. He definitly has skills. No motor to back them up though.

Monroe is a great passer and has a pretty decent handle for a big man, but oof, his athleticism is definitely more rec league than big leauge ... I think he'll be modestly useful if he lands in the right spot, but he's going to be a major liability in pick and roll situations and I don't see him being able to finish over some of the more athletic, springy forwards and centers he's going to face in the NBA. Hopefully he goes to Utah like most mocks predict.
 
Re: Cahd Ford's draft blog

Interesting. I'm the opposite. We drafted a couple of high-motor guys last year in Cunningham and Pendergraph, and neither of them were able to help us.

I'd rather take a chance with a potential difference-maker than try to draft more role players.

Ed O.

Weren't you disappointed we didn't draft Blair? (I was too). Blair definitely fits the description of a high-motor guy, that would never become a core / franchise player.

Also, are there any players drafted after our 2nd rounders that look to be high-impact at this point, that we passed on?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top