Who was Jesus?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
magnifier661 said:
It's okay he was sensitive on o live as he is here. I laugh at it because I remembered how butt hurt he would get and storm off.
Click to expand...

Storm off? Butt hurt? Dude, please. Clearly you're tripping or rather, you're experiencing a flash back and confusing me with some other threat to your ego.
 
if yoo spall some thin rong it is becus of drugz

syense
 
chevyrunssometimes said:
Oh say it isn't so!

My friend, you _must_ be on acid. Your feathers get ruffled over 'addle brained' in response to numerous typos, left out words, misused words, failures of logic, etc., etc. And yet I see nothing about the litany of profanity directed toward mag's opponent. Hypocritical mod, heal thyself. :-)
Click to expand...

They were going at it in a couple of different threads a few days ago and I did jump in and asked both of them to stop with the insults. I also edited a few of Mag's posts so the insults were directed at me instead of Nok. I read your post and it seemed to me that you were trying to start an argument instead of having a conversation.

Finally, lots of people make typos, spelling errors or grammar mistakes. It doesn't mean they're dumb or addle brained.
 
This debate on the existence of Jesus is getting deep. Oh wait, no it's not.
 
won dai i houp 2 spall rally gud lyke dixrundeap, she is mai herow
 
magnifier661 said:
I would assume he was because he kept Jewish law; but it wasn't mentioned.
Click to expand...

googled it

luke 2:21

On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived.
Click to expand...

well, that completely destroys the entire religion now doesnt it
 
magnifier661 said:
Oh no you caught me!
Click to expand...

No, I just happened to have read through the thread.

magnifier661 said:
What ever am I gonna do?
Click to expand...

Umm, let me guess ... you'll just laugh it off in an attempt to gloss over the fact that you can't keep track of your fabrications. Close?

magnifier661 said:
Still doesn't change the fact that none of my debates were ever under te influence.
Click to expand...

But, you see ... I did not say that your debates were a result of being on acid. In fact, I specifically asked what you would attribute your current quality of discourse to (phrasing changed to comply with mod) if not acid use.

magnifier661 said:
Albert Hoffman experimented with LSD until the age of 80 and lived to 100. He was still speaking in the science community until the age of 100.
Click to expand...

How is this relevant to any of my comments? Do you imagine you've proven something with it, or that it logically bears on you or me? Are you suggesting that 'what's okay for Albert is okay for mags?'

magnifier661 said:
So your comment is futile because of your myopic understanding.
Click to expand...

And what comment would that be? And my myopic understanding is what, exactly? Dude, sure you're not tripping? [rhetorical question] I mean it's like you're talking to some other person -- clearly not me. Oh I get it, you are talking to the me inside your head based on all the assumptions you've made about my assumptions. Right?

magnifier661 said:
But keep reaching sonny; maybe one day you will have your day in the sun!
Click to expand...

Reaching? Day in the sun? You must explain! I hope it's not some drug reference. Gotta get working on Sunday dinner, but I'm not storming off (snicker).
 
3RA1N1AC said:
logic is a bitch
Click to expand...

Well I don't know if you've kept up; but I have said the Old Testament is more of a testimony of how we can't be righteous and the New Testament is about grace, love and forgiveness. So I don't think it's a religion anymore.

So yeah I agree with you. The religion "living by works and laws" is dead and we are now living through Christ; whom shed blood to bring us to righteousness (the relationship).
 
chevyrunssometimes said:
No, I just happened to have read through the thread.



Umm, let me guess ... you'll just laugh it off in an attempt to gloss over the fact that you can't keep track of your fabrications. Close?



But, you see ... I did not say that your debates were a result of being on acid. In fact, I specifically asked what you would attribute your current quality of discourse to (phrasing changed to comply with mod) if not acid use.



How is this relevant to any of my comments? Do you imagine you've proven something with it, or that it logically bears on you or me? Are you suggesting that 'what's okay for Albert is okay for mags?'



And what comment would that be? And my myopic understanding is what, exactly? Dude, sure you're not tripping? [rhetorical question] I mean it's like you're talking to some other person -- clearly not me. Oh I get it, you are talking to the me inside your head based on all the assumptions you've made about my assumptions. Right?



Reaching? Day in the sun? You must explain! I hope it's not some drug reference. Gotta get working on Sunday dinner, but I'm not storming off (snicker).
Click to expand...

Dude just FYI; when you try to use a dig on drugs to get a rise on me; it won't work. I really don't respect you and your comments are ignorant about psychedelics. I didn't respect you in olive and you are making a fine case in this forum.

But keep at it. It looks like you're having fun!
 
i wonder if scientists will clone jesus from his foreskin dna, and start the end times with his resurrection...the perfect marriage of science and religion

of course he will be an infant, and likely a target for assassination
 
3RA1N1AC said:
if yoo spall some thin rong it is becus of drugz

syense
Click to expand...

Logic is our friend. It's not that a misspelling indicates or means acid use. Rather it's just that doing all the things mentioned does not rule out drug use, hence the query. I can easily forgive typos and the like, but clearly there is a diminished form of processing going on on mag's side of the skull. Others see it too. But I suppose they're just more sore debaters who've been previously dispatched by mag's superior wit and intellect. Yeah, I'm sure that's it.
 
3RA1N1AC said:
i wonder if scientists will clone jesus from his foreskin dna, and start the end times with his resurrection...the perfect marriage of science and religion

of course he will be an infant, and likely a target for assassination
Click to expand...

I have reason to believe that if you clone a person; they are copied without a soul. I think it would be like a computer without spiritual programming.

But I know you don't agree with one having a soul; so I think my opinion is moot to you
 
3RA1N1AC said:
so the old testament is bullshit?
Click to expand...

No I don't think it's bullshit. I think it's a reference. I think it's stories that show just how hard it is for man to reach righteousness on their own. Believing and having grace through God is, what I believe, the only way to receive righteousness.
 
magnifier661 said:
I have reason to believe that if you clone a person; they are copied without a soul. I think it would be like a computer without spiritual programming.

But I know you don't agree with one having a soul; so I think my opinion is moot to you
Click to expand...

well, whats the reason? i havent closed the book on souls, there is no way for me to really know
 
3RA1N1AC said:
well, whats the reason? i havent closed the book on souls, there is no way for me to really know
Click to expand...

My reason is nothing scientific. I just think there is a part of us that isn't of flesh. So you could copy all the Organics; but you can't copy a soul.

A house in a housing tract can all be from the same design; but the personalities that live in the different houses change what's inside. I hope that makes sense.
 
magnifier661 said:
My reason is nothing scientific. I just think there is a part of us that isn't of flesh. So you could copy all the Organics; but you can't copy a soul.

A house in a housing tract can all be from the same design; but the personalities that live in the different houses change what's inside. I hope that makes sense.
Click to expand...

sure people have different personalities and what not.

do you think it would be apparent that said clone did not possess a soul? would the clone know that he was devoid? would god really turn down a perfect human who never sinned because he had the misfortune of being created in a lab?
 
3RA1N1AC said:
sure people have different personalities and what not.

do you think it would be apparent that said clone did not possess a soul? would the clone know that he was devoid? would god really turn down a perfect human who never sinned because he had the misfortune of being created in a lab?
Click to expand...

I really don't know those answers. I'm just assuming a soul is personalized. Once given; that same soul can be recycled IMO.
 
3RA1N1AC said:
its not that using the phrase "hence the query" indicates or means you have a small cock. Rather it's just that doing the thing mentioned does not rule out you have a small cock.
Click to expand...

Ah, come on. Now you're just being a small dick about your previous problem with implication.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SlyPokerDog
Elton John, "Jesus was gay"
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
chris_in_pdx
chris_in_pdx
SlyPokerDog
Jesus 'was the son of a middle-class architect' ?!?
Replies
6
Views
720
tim123
T
SlyPokerDog
1500-Year-Old Bible Discovered In Turkey Indicates Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified
Replies
20
Views
2K
MarAzul
MarAzul
tlongII
Gary Carter dead at 57
Replies
3
Views
541
julius
julius
Chris Craig
OT Nike Jesus Shoes
Replies
6
Views
2K
bigbailes
bigbailes

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top