Who would you trade Andre Miller for?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Who would you trade Andre Miller for?

  • Nobody, he's not the problem!

    Votes: 17 43.6%

  • Only a top-ten PG, and nobody's offering

    Votes: 4 10.3%

  • Anybody who can play defense

    Votes: 3 7.7%

  • Bayless!

    Votes: 1 2.6%

  • Sergio!

    Votes: 1 2.6%

  • Kirk Hinrich (good luck with that)

    Votes: 9 23.1%

  • Louis Williams

    Votes: 1 2.6%

  • Ramon Sessions

    Votes: 1 2.6%

  • Ty Lawson

    Votes: 2 5.1%
  • Total voters
    39
Capt. Kirk. I would throw anyone from Webster, JB and Outlaw in the deal as well.
 
Ty Lawson. This team can definitly use some team speed.
 
I still think it's hilarious that people are blaming our backup point guard for our shitty play. The guy put up 11 assists and zero turnovers last night. Please please please explain to me how that's hurting our team.
 
Natebishop3 said:
I still think it's hilarious that people are blaming our backup point guard for our shitty play. The guy put up 11 assists and zero turnovers last night. Please please please explain to me how that's hurting our team.
Click to expand...


QFT.

What we should do, is create a poll on what coach we should trade for. lol
 
Anyone that thinks a player that isn't even allowed to play at their strengths can't be put to blame. It's like putting 40 octane gas in a race car. You won't get the performance you need.
 
It's not Andre, IMO... it's the system right now he's being put in, which is basically Blake's role -- hand the ball to Brandon, and stand in the corner and wait for the kick-out, but he's not a jump-shooter. We're just not utilizing his skills at all.
 
I would love Ty Lawson. But Miller is not the problem. The problem is Nate.
 
I dont really get the poll... I dont think Andre is the problem.. but there are multiple guys on ehre I would trade him for.
 
RR7 said:
+1. And then I'd trade Bayless for Blake.

Miller/Bayless/Blake
Click to expand...

Close, but not quite:


Customer:
Morning,

Waitress:
Morning.

Customer:
What have you got?

Waitress:
Well, there's egg and bacon,
egg sausage and bacon
Egg and Blake
Egg, bacon and Blake
Egg, bacon, sausage and Blake
Blake, bacon, sausage and Blake
Blake, egg, Blake, Blake, bacon and Blake
Blake, sausage, Blake, Blake, Blake, bacon, Blake tomato and Blake
Blake, Blake, Blake, egg and Blake
Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, baked beans, Blake, Blake, Blake and Blake.

(Choir: Blake! Blake! Blake! Blake! Lovely Blake! Lovely Blake!)

Or Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a mornay sauce
served in a provencale manner with shallots and aubergines
garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Blake.

Wife:
Have you got anything without Blake?

Waitress:
Well, the Blake, eggs, sausage and Blake
That's not got much Blake in it

Wife:
I don't want any Blake!

Customer:
Why can't she have eggs, bacon, Blake and sausage?

Wife:
That's got Blake in it!

Customer:
Hasn't got much Blake in it as Blake, eggs, sausage and Blake has it?

(Choir: Blake! Blake! Blake!...)

Wife:
Could you do me eggs, bacon, Blake and sausage without the Blake, then?

Waitress:
Iiiiiiiiiiiich!!

Wife:
What do you mean 'Iiiiiiiiiich'? I don't like Blake!

(Choir: Lovely Blake! Wonderful Blake!)

Waitress (to choir):
Shut up!

(Choir: Lovely Blake! Wonderful Blake!)

Waitress:
Shut Up! Bloody Vikings!
You can't have egg, bacon, Blake and sausage without the Blake.

Wife:
I don't like Blake!

Customer:
Shush dear, don't have a fuss. I'll have your Blake. I love it,
I'm having Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, baked beans,
Blake, Blake, Blake, and Blake!

(Choir: Blake! Blake! Blake! Blake! Lovely Blake! Wonderful Blake!)

Waitress:
Shut Up!! Baked beans are off.

Customer:
Well, could I have her Blake instead of the baked beans then?

Waitress:
You mean Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake, Blake,
Blake and Blake?

Choir (intervening):
Blake! Blake! Blake! Blake!
Lovely Blake! Wonderful Blake!
Blake spa-a-a-a-a-am Blake spa-a-a-a-a-am Blake.
Lovely Blake! Lovely Blake! Lovely Blake! Lovely Blake!
Blake Blake Blake Blake
Click to expand...

In summary, we should go with Blake/Blake/Blake/Blake/Blake.
 
I was watching Kirk Hinrich last night and he did a nice job against the smaller Brandon Jennings. Staying with him, knocking the ball out of his hands. We need someone that can guard smaller points right? I think he should have been the target all along. So if it can't work out with Andre, then maybe Portland should target Kirk.
 
RoyIsClutch07 said:
I was watching Kirk Hinrich last night and he did a nice job against the smaller Brandon Jennings. Staying with him, knocking the ball out of his hands. We need someone that can guard smaller points right? I think he should have been the target all along. So if it can't work out with Andre, then maybe Portland should target Kirk.
Click to expand...

I would have no problem throwing Blake, Outlaw, and Bayless at them for him.
 
Sorry this isnt the "who would you package Outlaw and Blake for?" thread.
 
RoyIsClutch07 said:
quantity for quality.

Yes. I would not think twice.
Click to expand...

yeah.. but would they do it? :sigh:

maybe we could get greedy and try and trade a 1st rounder for Taj :ghoti:
 
Wheels said:
yeah.. but would they do it? :sigh:

maybe we could get greedy and try and trade a 1st rounder for Taj :ghoti:
Click to expand...

I don't think so. But I could be wrong.

I would say, throw in Jerryd, but I think I'm more interested in seeing him get a chance on the court now. Getting him sometime. I don't know, I liked what I saw out of him in preseason. Think he could be ready.
 
The draft rights to Ricky Rubio.
 
I don't really think Miller is the problem, but he's not getting any younger and he and Brandon are clearly a bad match together under Nate's "system" (if you want to call it that).

So in short, yeah I'd trade him if we could get a player that fits better over the long haul -- a guy who can guard the perimeter and hit an open shot. Then again I find myself asking, is Nate going to be here for the long haul, and if not will Brandon ever be able to play alongside a traditional play making point guard?
 
Nikolokolus said:
I don't really think Miller is the problem, but he's not getting any younger and he and Brandon are clearly a bad match together under Nate's "system" (if you want to call it that).

So in short, yeah I'd trade him if we could get a player that fits better over the long haul -- a guy who can guard the perimeter and hit an open shot. Then again I find myself asking, is Nate going to be here for the long haul, and if not will Brandon ever be able to play alongside a traditional play making point guard?
Click to expand...

pretty well said. I'm not saying Nate should be fired.. cause so far in his tenure here he has done a good job. I want him to succeed.. but if he isnt here throughout the season or after the end of this season... I could see another coach here. It wouldnt be the first time a coach comes in to put a team over the top. In like a Larry Brown type situation.
 
I wouldn't mind Ramon Sessions...unfortunately, it sounds like the Timberwolves like him quite a bit.
 
Natebishop3 said:
I still think it's hilarious that people are blaming our backup point guard for our shitty play. The guy put up 11 assists and zero turnovers last night. Please please please explain to me how that's hurting our team.
Click to expand...

I think it's hilarious that one of the leaders of the "Bash Outlaw" movement would post the above. :devilwink:
 
I wanted to pick 2 choices. He's not the problem & Kirk Hinrich. Just because I think Kirk is a better fit, not because I feel Andre needs to go.
 
Minstrel said:
I wouldn't mind Ramon Sessions...unfortunately, it sounds like the Timberwolves like him quite a bit.
Click to expand...

Sessions is down in every statistical category versus his career numbers outside of rebounding. He has a PER of 11.6 right now and has yet to hit a 3 pt shot this season. If Miller can't fit in, how the heck is a lesser player like Sessions going to fit in?
 
PapaG said:
Sessions is down in every statistical category versus his career numbers outside of rebounding. He has a PER of 11.6 right now and has yet to hit a 3 pt shot this season.
Click to expand...

It's pretty early in the season. Channing Frye has a star PER. Things might change over the course of the season.

If Miller can't fit in, how the heck is a lesser player like Sessions going to fit in?
Click to expand...

I think both can fit in. Currently, the entire offense is disjointed and it's certainly not all Miller's fault. I actually think Miller and Sessions are similar types of players, but Sessions is much younger.
 
LMAO, that's about the size of it @ Mook (dont' want to quote due to Spam effect :drumroll: )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top