OT Why did Stotts step down?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Damn, yeah I’d be pretty ticked off too if some new guy started bossing me around even though I have ten years of experience on him.
Understand the sentiment here.

But there is a giant gulf between good and great. Just because someone is good and has experience (Stotts) doesn't mean they know how to be great.
We'll see if Griffin has that ability or not.

All things being equal, I would MUCH rather have someone with very little experience and the inclination to be great... than someone with a lot of experience being 'good'.

Pulling it back to Portland - that is why I was good with Stotts being fired. Chauncey said the right things to begin with. I'm not sure he knows how to be a great coach. I think he's sort of has an 'old man - get off my lawn' type mindset. He says he knows what it takes to win in this league -> but I think he's still playing the game like 20-years ago.
 
Stotts was always bad at handling offense through double teams. I heard OKC was blitzing Dame, and the Bucks melted down like gummy bears by a space heater.

Coaches yelling at Practice ??
I don't believe Shams at all, that guys a snake.
But a disagreement with Stotts on providing a killer offense through double teams I do believe.
 
Imagine, if somebody somewhere is posting in a forum after reading something from the jinx Speed guy and saying, “hey, the Blazers forum says this!”

good lord
 
Interesting that in the Athletic article, Lillard doesn’t say why Stotts is leaving, even though Stotts must have told him.
 
I would have liked to have read that.
check.gif
 
I read that Morey had hired Olshey way back in June so it's not connected to Terry leaving the Bucks by any stretch...also why would he want to work with the guy who fired him anyway?
 
Interesting that in the Athletic article, Lillard doesn’t say why Stotts is leaving, even though Stotts must have told him.

Stotts didn't need to tell Dame why. Dame ordered the Bucks to get rid of Stotts himself, just like he did with the Blazers.

That's the story I just made up, and I'm sticking to it.

barfo
 
Understand the sentiment here.

But there is a giant gulf between good and great. Just because someone is good and has experience (Stotts) doesn't mean they know how to be great.
We'll see if Griffin has that ability or not.

All things being equal, I would MUCH rather have someone with very little experience and the inclination to be great... than someone with a lot of experience being 'good'.

Pulling it back to Portland - that is why I was good with Stotts being fired. Chauncey said the right things to begin with. I'm not sure he knows how to be a great coach. I think he's sort of has an 'old man - get off my lawn' type mindset. He says he knows what it takes to win in this league -> but I think he's still playing the game like 20-years ago.
Stotts has a championship ring AS AN ASSISTANT COACH. How can you get better than that?
 

I’m sure you talked to Terry a bunch. He seemed so nice and very calm in interviews and on the sidelines, like the kind of guy who would have to be pretty offended to quit. Is that an accurate portrayal?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top