Why don't they give assists on fouls?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Natebishop3

Don't tread on me!
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
94,247
Likes
57,517
Points
113
It doesn't make sense to me. A player makes a good pass that in some cases would have led to points, but the receiving player is fouled and goes to the line. The passer gets no credit in the current system.

Why not give .5 assists per make?

So if the receiver steps to the line and sinks both shots, the passer gets 1 assist for his part in the play.
 
While we're at it, the big guy standing under the basket should get 0.5 rebounds for collecting a missed free throw. :)
 
I've always felt the same. Especially since they, I believe will credit a team with a fast break point if fouled on the break and they make a FT.
 
Jack Armstrong has advocated for this for years. Assist counts if the player makes all free throws (2 or 3 depending on the foul).
 
I have a feeling that the only reason why is because it would mess up the record books
 
Do the refs get a .5 rebound if they catch it? :devilwink:
Ha, ha. Maybe they do. That might explain the ref who blocked the free throw attempt and the other one who was wrestling for the ball after the missed free throw. Something is going on with these guys. ;)
 
Not a bad idea.

How about cutting tip-in's down to 0.5 rebounds on the stat sheet?

Z'Bo's my guy, but he must get 1-3 rpg on tip-in's every game, and you can probably lump players like Dwight Howard into that boat as well.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't make sense to me. A player makes a good pass that in some cases would have led to points, but the receiving player is fouled and goes to the line. The passer gets no credit in the current system.

Why not give .5 assists per make?

So if the receiver steps to the line and sinks both shots, the passer gets 1 assist for his part in the play.

I have always thought the same thing
 
The problem is that it's assumed the player would have made the basket. He may have missed or the shot blocked... so why give an assist when the outcome is never determined? I mean if that's the case why not give an assist on interior passes that are stolen.
 
The problem is that it's assumed the player would have made the basket. He may have missed or the shot blocked... so why give an assist when the outcome is never determined? I mean if that's the case why not give an assist on interior passes that are stolen.

It's not assuming that. What it is is awarding an assist for points created. They don't get it if the guy misses the FTs.
 
It's not assuming that. What it is is awarding an assist for points created. They don't get it if the guy misses the FTs.

OK, got it.

That said, I still disagree. To me, if the assist does not directly lead to a basket made, no assist.
 
There shouldn't be an assist given, but I'd like to see this stat recorded anyway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top