Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,242
- Likes
- 57,506
- Points
- 113
Hey Nate..I am trying to be respectful and forthright in saying this, I dont think one would have to look through many threads to see where you and he would clash. Often for no reason other than you both seem to not like each other. Nothing wrong with that, I have a poster that I just cant allow myself to read for fear that I will want to jump on him and his posts with both feet...I cant help it..difference is that it does bring to question your ability to ban someone that you feel this way about. It is unfortunate that Sly did not perform that feat instead of you as there would be no apparent personal motive.
I respect your opinion, and I'm trying to hopefully explain WHY I did it, or at least how I viewed the situation. You're right, he and I have a long and storied feud that spans the course of years. The reason why I took action is because I was the one who unbanned him from the last permanent ban that he incurred. We allowed him back under the condition that the personal attacks would stop. Completely. He was on probation and there was no term for that probation. We didn't have to allow him back at all. So as the person who brought him back unilaterally, I felt that his breaking the conditions of his probation was justification to remove him again.
This also wasn't the first time he has attacked people or gotten into arguments, so I think he had a lot of chances to change, but he simply couldn't.


