Politics Will Kennedy Wreck America's Health?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Depending on the remaining guardrails we might be able to fight him off from real damage for a year or two… but what wars will we lose to win this one? Can’t think of any as big as this but two or three of them combined would be really rough.
 
CJ_is_Gone said:
You ought to actually listen to what he says- instead of listening to the media's narrative.

He's fine with vaccines as long as they meet the safety protocols. Unfortunately the vast majority have been approved with minimal evaluation.
Click to expand...
They meet safety protocols. They prevent exponentially more pain, suffering and death than they cause.

I have listened to what he says and have seen what he's written. He's a snake oil salesman.
 
Really? Have you seen protocols for vaccine approval? Has he?
Kennedy has said there is no safe and effective vaccine. He has said more people died of Covid vaccine than Covid. He denies HIV causes AIDS. He said Covid was engineered to kill Black people and white Christians but spare Chinese and Jews, not only racist but biologically impossible. He wants to remove fluoride from water, leading to worsening dental problems, especially in poor people with less access to dental care. He has no training or experience in science and medicine.
 
crandc said:
He said Covid was engineered to kill Black people and white Christians but spare Chinese and Jews, not only racist but biologically impossible.
Click to expand...
He didn't say that explicitly. To make a different point, he cited a study which mentioned the possibility.

crandc said:
He wants to remove fluoride from water, leading to worsening dental problems, especially in poor people with less access to dental care.
Click to expand...

He says that while he opposes fluoride, he won't force local districts to abandon it, just advise them to. (Like when they ask HHS for information on the subject.)

crandc said:
He has no training or experience in science and medicine.
Click to expand...

True, his Harvard B.A. was in history. But after his J.D. made him a lawyer, he focused on environmental law, and then became a professor of environmental law 28 years ago.

I don't think RFK will be able to change anything. Few politicians can. Even the Reagan years were 90% propaganda talk and 10% successful action. Where Trump will actually hurt people is by kicking them out of the country. Also, huge tariffs will cause huge inflation.
 
Antivaxxers often say they are not against all vaccines. Just every vaccine on the market.
Auto manufacturers are not against all safety features and mileage standards. Just every safety feature and mileage standards proposed.
Gum manufacturers used to say they are not against gun safety measures, just every gun safety measure proposed. They have now dropped all pretense. Unlike antivaxxers they are being honest, they are against all guns safety measures.
 
CJ_is_Gone said:
You ought to actually listen to what he says- instead of listening to the media's narrative.
Click to expand...

I have listened to things he's said and read stuff he's written

CJ_is_Gone said:
He's fine with vaccines as long as they meet the safety protocols. Unfortunately the vast majority have been approved with minimal evaluation.
Click to expand...

bullshit
 
I want @CJ_is_Gone to tell me what vaccines were approved with minimal evaluation. And cite source for his/her/their claim. Does he/she/they know we can look it up on FDA site? Was this done before making the claim?
 
crandc said:
He doesn't have to. Republicans vote to adjourn and Trump confirms entire cabinet as recess appointments.
Click to expand...

At the moment, I think the odds are pretty good that Trump doesn't have enough votes in the Senate for that to happen.

Obviously, that could change, but there'd only have to be four. I thought I read somewhere there were as many as eight that probably would vote against recessing.
 
Phatguysrule said:
They meet safety protocols. They prevent exponentially more pain, suffering and death than they cause.

I have listened to what he says and have seen what he's written. He's a snake oil salesman.
Click to expand...

So you see no issue that none of the childhood vaccines have been safety tested against placebo? That epidemiological studies that show vaccine harm have been buried?

If he's so out to lunch on the vaccine issue, why did the manufacterers demand immunity?

Besides, vaccines are just one issue, there's a whole host of others, from food additives, pesticides etc that he wants to clean from our environment.

Vaccine benefits are largely propaganda as well. The mortality of these diseases was already falling sharply before the vaccine was rolled out. And just look at how diseases (Scarlet Fever on this graph) for which no vaccine was ever created fell at about the same rate.



G11.2-UK-Deaths-1838-1978-1.png
 
There is clearly something environmental at play. Why has no administration done anything about this? It's because of the industries that would be pointed to if they found the answer.

But cry about RFK Jr. You lefties like harming children. Pro abortion, pro mutilating children's gentials, pro giving puberty blockers, pro poisoning...

You have no idea of what "health" really is. Because to you, health is the having pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines, or simply the prevention of acute disease, while you totally ignore chronic dibilitating diseases and obesity.
upload_2024-11-22_5-46-18.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2024-11-22_5-46-18.jpeg
    upload_2024-11-22_5-46-18.jpeg
    142.7 KB · Views: 77
Last edited:
superfly4201 said:
Why the hell to the Hawks do that
Click to expand...

beast blazer said:
So you see no issue that none of the childhood vaccines have been safety tested against placebo? That epidemiological studies that show vaccine harm have been buried?

If he's so out to lunch on the vaccine issue, why did the manufacterers demand immunity?

Besides, vaccines are just one issue, there's a whole host of others, from food additives, pesticides etc that he wants to clean from our environment.

Vaccine benefits are largely propaganda as well. The mortality of these diseases was already falling sharply before the vaccine was rolled out. And just look at how diseases (Scarlet Fever on this graph) for which no vaccine was ever created fell at about the same rate.



G11.2-UK-Deaths-1838-1978-1.png
Click to expand...

beast blazer said:
There is clearly something environmental at play. Why has no administration done anything about this? It's because of the industries that would be pointed to if they found the answer.

But cry about RFK Jr. You lefties like harming children. Pro abortion, pro mutilating children's gentials, pro giving puberty blockers, pro poisoning...

You have no idea of what "health" really is. Because to you, health is the having pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines, or simply the prevention of acute disease, while you totally ignore chronic dibilitating diseases and obesity.
View attachment 67970
Click to expand...

Images are not compelling evidence.
 
Since so called chem trails are a natural phenomenon, how does brain worm plan to get rid of them?
 
beast blazer said:
What does that mean? You don't believe that data is accurate?
Click to expand...

A better classification of autism leads to an increase in the number of diagnosed cases because it allows for more accurate identification of individuals across the spectrum, including those with milder symptoms who may have previously gone undiagnosed, resulting in a higher reported prevalence of autism due to improved diagnostic practices and awareness.

Key points about this phenomenon:
  • Broader diagnostic criteria:
    When the criteria for diagnosing autism are expanded to encompass a wider range of symptoms and presentations, more people are likely to be identified as autistic.

  • Increased awareness:
    Greater public understanding of autism leads to earlier identification and more individuals seeking diagnosis.

  • Improved diagnostic tools:
    Advancements in assessment methods and better trained professionals can lead to more accurate diagnoses.

  • Important distinction:
    While the number of diagnosed cases might increase due to better classification, it does not necessarily mean that the actual prevalence of autism is rising, but rather that more cases are being recognized.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
A better classification of autism leads to an increase in the number of diagnosed cases because it allows for more accurate identification of individuals across the spectrum, including those with milder symptoms who may have previously gone undiagnosed, resulting in a higher reported prevalence of autism due to improved diagnostic practices and awareness.

Key points about this phenomenon:
  • Broader diagnostic criteria:
    When the criteria for diagnosing autism are expanded to encompass a wider range of symptoms and presentations, more people are likely to be identified as autistic.

  • Increased awareness:
    Greater public understanding of autism leads to earlier identification and more individuals seeking diagnosis.

  • Improved diagnostic tools:
    Advancements in assessment methods and better trained professionals can lead to more accurate diagnoses.

  • Important distinction:
    While the number of diagnosed cases might increase due to better classification, it does not necessarily mean that the actual prevalence of autism is rising, but rather that more cases are being recognized.
Click to expand...
That idea has already been evaluated. The rates are still skyrocketing even when you only look at severely disabled.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top