Mediocre Man
Mr. SportsTwo
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 44,954
- Likes
- 27,842
- Points
- 113
Ouch.
In fairness to Olshey, that has been reported multiple times that was at the request of Donald Sterling to save money
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ouch.
In fairness to Olshey, that has been reported multiple times that was at the request of Donald Sterling to save money
A prospective team will probably wait until FA to pick up Hickson. Why trade for him when you can go after him during FA? Besides, they wouldn't have to give up something valuable in the process.
The only reasons i can think of is:
1) a chance to win it all this year
2) Maybe by trading for him it opens up cap space that they would not of previously had this summer.
Point 1. Do you really think there's some championship contender out there dying for a backup 4 who doesn't play defense to push them over the top?
Point 2. If a team gets him as a cap space clearing plan, that means that the Blazers are taking back a player (or players) with guaranteed money left on their deal, which hurts our cap-space. Maybe Neil can find a guy that he wants for the long-term, but I really doubt it (given Hickson's presumed value around the league).
Point 1. Do you really think there's some championship contender out there dying for a backup 4 who doesn't play defense to push them over the top?
Point 2. If a team gets him as a cap space clearing plan, that means that the Blazers are taking back a player (or players) with guaranteed money left on their deal, which hurts our cap-space. Maybe Neil can find a guy that he wants for the long-term, but I really doubt it (given Hickson's presumed value around the league).
Point 1. Do you really think there's some championship contender out there dying for a backup 4 who doesn't play defense to push them over the top?
Point 2. If a team gets him as a cap space clearing plan, that means that the Blazers are taking back a player (or players) with guaranteed money left on their deal, which hurts our cap-space. Maybe Neil can find a guy that he wants for the long-term, but I really doubt it (given Hickson's presumed value around the league).
I just looked at this thread and am surprised that you guys didn't begin with the best indicator, Olshey's history on Midseason Trade Deadline Day. Does he use the day or not?
Asst. GM
On 2/16/10, he and Dunleavy traded Marcus Camby to Portland for Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw.
On 2/17/10, they traded, with the Cavs and Wizards, Sebastian Telfair and Al Thornton to get Drew Gooden.
GM
On 2/24/11, he traded Baron Davis and a first round pick (#1-Kyrie Irving) to Cleveland for Mo Williams and Jamario Moon.
On 3/15/12, he traded Brian Cook and a 2015 #2 to Washington for Nick Young.
Conclusion: He tends to make horrible trades at the deadline.
IIRC people ("insiders") were saying this tough road trip will determine if this team is a playoff or lotto team.
I think Neil makes more than one deal.
You got my attention. Now, what's he gonna trade to make these "deals" happen?
A box of half-eaten fried rice from Lucky Dragon, a mismatched pair of sweaty gym socks and Luke Babbitt.
Do you really think they'd want Babbitt?
He's the throw-in.
http://www.blazersedge.com/2013/2/11/3978930/broussard-blazers-interested-in-spurs-f-dejuan-blair
Let's all argue about this the rest of the day
I don't think there is any way he trades Hickson, but not necessarily for lack of trying.
Hickson wants to take full advantage of free agency and get a big contract. He has the right to veto any trade, and I think he'd do exactly that. He's in a great situation right now. He's starting and averaging a double-double. if his goal is a big contract, why would he want to go to a contender where he'd be a back-up getting 10 - 12 minutes a night? I just don't see any possible trade scenario that would benefit the Blazers, their trading partner and Hickson. The Blazers will do exactly what they did last summer, they will renounce Hickson, make a serious run at someone better, and if that falls through see if they can get Hickson on a cheap contract.
You are probably right. But your scenario does point to one reason Hickson agrees to a trade. He got nowhere last year in free agency and re-signed here. Maybe if there's a willing trade suitor out there he'd be willing to take the bird in the hand right now rather than risk having the same thing happen to him again this summer. I'm sure his agent will want him to hold tight and wait for the bigger contract, but if I'm Hickson I might go off emotion and say, "Hey, I've been busting my tail and there are no guarantees. I could get injured. The Blazers could go into tank mode and bench me for the rest of the year. I might not look so shiny this summer compared to what else is out there. I'll take the sure $7 mil now and play on a relevant team rather than risk waiting for more later."
