William Shatner can f' off!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,198
Likes
147,724
Points
115
William Shatner is hoping to save California from further drought by proposing an enterprise of his own — importing water from the Seattle area, where rain is plentiful.

"I want $30 billion … to build a pipeline like the Alaska pipeline. Say, from Seattle — a place where there’s a lot of water. There’s too much water," the "Star Trek" actor told Yahoo's David Pogue in an interview. "How bad would it be to get a large, 4-foot pipeline, keep it aboveground — because if it leaks, you’re irrigating!”

Shatner said he plans to launch a Kickstarter campaign to raise $30 billion to build the pipeline from water-soaked Seattle to fill California's lakes.

Pogue expressed some skepticism about the plan, to which Shatner responded: “They did it in Alaska — why can’t they do it along Highway 5? This whole area’s about to go under!”

...

Decades ago, California water officials talked about taking water from the Pacific Northwest but those plans were never realized.

During earlier droughts in 1977 and 1990, Los Angeles Supervisor Kenneth Hahn proposed digging aqueducts that would carry water to California from the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest and the Snake River in Idaho. But there was little interest from those states.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-william-shatner-drought-seattle-20150420-story.html
 
When I was in high school, they talked about towing a giant ice berg from the arctic to the middle east for irrigation.
 
California has an over-abundance of water, more than enough to satisfy every single legal citizen living there.

If there's a shortage, take it up with Mexico or the INS.
 
I'm going to launch a Kickstarter campaign to sell California to China.
 
When I was in high school, they talked about towing a giant ice berg from the arctic to the middle east for irrigation.

Great idea, except there are no icebergs anymore. Oops, wait, global warming isn't real, right?
 
Great idea, except there are no icebergs anymore. Oops, wait, global warming isn't real, right?

There are lots of icebergs.

http://www.icebergfinder.com/iceberg-facts.aspx

Every year about 40,000 medium- to large-sized icebergs break off, or calve, from Greenland glaciers. Only about 400-800 make it as far south as St. John's, but these numbers can vary greatly from year to year. The chances of seeing icebergs in a particular area depend on the number of bergs, wind direction, oceans current and temperatures, and the amount of sea ice, or pack ice. Sea ice protects icebergs from the battering of waves and helps them last longer. Years of little sea ice cover are often years of few icebergs along Newfoundland's coast. Also, there may be areas where you can't see any, but 100 kilometres up the coast there might be dozens, so be prepared to travel around. And remember that icebergs are constantly on the move.

Icebergs can vary greatly in size, ranging from very large - greater than 10 million tonnes and hundreds of metres long - to large, medium, and small bergs. The smallest are termed "bergy bits," which are the size of a small house, and "growlers," which are the size of a grand piano. These smaller pieces are hazardous to ships because radar may not pick them up as they bob up and down among the waves. The average weight for a Grand Banks-area iceberg is 100,000-200,000 tonnes - about the size of a cubic 15-storey building.
 
But great! Denny boiled some water for his morning tea, drought over!

Now California needs to keep away from PNW water. It's ours and we don't want to give you any!
 
I did read the whole thing.

The IPCC is wrong, the climate models are wrong, the fluctuations in temperature are normal and natural.
 
But great! Denny boiled some water for his morning tea, drought over!

Now California needs to keep away from PNW water. It's ours and we don't want to give you any!
The oceans are dead.

:lol:
 
The oceans are dead.

:lol:

I post links showing that we've killed off 90% of the large fish in the oceans and you prove me wrong by posting recipes and an article showing that we've fished one species of fish to near extinction and killed an industry.
 
The oceans are dead.

:lol:

Again, I've provided numerous links showing we've killed off 90% of the large fish in the ocean. You claim everything is fine. Just how close to extinction do we have to get before you admit there is a problem? 95%? 97%? 100%?
 
Again, I've provided numerous links showing we've killed off 90% of the large fish in the ocean. You claim everything is fine. Just how close to extinction do we have to get before you admit there is a problem? 95%? 97%? 100%?
Not dead. False claim. Plenty of fish in the sea. Plenty of life in the sea.

Not dead.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top