Wisconsin's....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Because obviously we have no shot at playing Alabama this year :grin:

assuming Bama goes undefeated. And with Wisconsin being the Gods they are.. they probably would go undefeated to the Natty as well. :devilwink:
 
The problem with your hypothetical is that if Oregon loses to Stanford they will NOT go to a BCS Bowl.
 
The problem with your hypothetical is that if Oregon loses to Stanford they will NOT go to a BCS Bowl.

not entirely true. As MM brought out that if Oregon demolishes most competition but only has two losses to #1 and # whatever Stanford is.. that would make them a strong case for one of the better 2 loss teams for an at large bid
 
The problem with your hypothetical is that if Oregon loses to Stanford they will NOT go to a BCS Bowl.

There are 10 BCS bowl slots. 6 go to AQ champs. 1 will go to Boise. That means 3 for AQ conference at large teams. No conference gets more than 2 BCS slots. So, SEC gets 1 at-large slot, Big-12 gets one, and there is one left for a team from the Pac-12 or Big 10 (because there's no way the ACC or Big East send two teams). Most likely, it would come down to either us or Nebraska. I say we'd have a fighting chance, even with 2 losses.
 
Not exactly sure the harm in asking and discussing hypothetical situations regarding how the season could unfold and impact potential bowl matchups.

Isn't that entire point of "bowl projections" that most of like like to read?

If you don't like it, don't join in. What's the point in saying fans are freaking out and shouldn't discuss the possibilities of unfavorable matchups based on previous play and history?

Sheesh, posting nazi! :tsktsk: :devilwink:
 
ah see but if we do join in we get told we are basically stupid for feeling different. And a whole bunch of !!! and a few All Caps thrown in. I seem to remember how letting that fly went down in the Blazers forum :devilwink:
 
Last edited:
Um, so, someone made you feel stupid and threw in a few caps (which clearly irked you) so that makes it ok to tell people not to discuss hypothetical bowl matchups on the board AND (!) it's ok to claim someone is "freaking" out.

Got it... Cool story. Cool board, dude! :dunno:
 
Can call me what you want. Doesnt bother me a bit. But yes it does irk me when its done to other posters.
 
but to keep it on topic to this thread. Its amusing how we've already lost to like 4 teams we havent played this season :)
 
I'll need to keep reminding myself I'm not one of the cool kids that gets to joke around, and apparently I'm held to higher standard than anyone else.

Admit it...you're a MOD who is discouraging discussion on something that is a big part of sports - evaluating matchups. You mock people for not only using the occasional cap, but mock them for viewing some teams as unbeatable (re: gods comment). Besides that, the only thing that myself and another poster said was that Oregon would "struggle...like everyone" when discussing Wis size.

Anyhoo, your board. Your rules. Stellar job.
 
I'll need to keep reminding myself I'm not one of the cool kids that gets to joke around, and apparently I'm held to higher standard than anyone else.

I dont quite understand this comment sorry. But if you care to elaborate I will gladly respond to this.

Admit it...you're a MOD who is discouraging discussion on something that is a big part of sports - evaluating matchups.

I enjoy evaluating matchups. I do not enjoy differing opinions being talked down to as someone is an idiot when their opinion holds just as much validity is another one.

You mock people for not only using the occasional cap

remember I find them amusing.

but mock them for viewing some teams as unbeatable (re: gods comment).

again my beef is not that someone views them as unbeatable. Hell you and I have been giving LSU more credit than some others on here. My beef is with how someone handles said disagreement.

Besides that, the only thing that myself and another poster said was that Oregon would "struggle...like everyone" when discussing Wis size.

I reviewed each of my posts in this thread. I dont see where I addressed anything on your thoughts in the thread. So I apologize if somehow it came across as shooting down your thoughts (which I happen to agree with)

Anyhoo, your board. Your rules. Stellar job.

It is pretty decent, and a nice little tight knit Ducks community. Thank you for what you bring to this place! (no sarcasm, it is appreciated)
 
Watching these Badgers against Michigan St. They seem determined to make this a statement game. Up 14-0 already, halfway through the 1st quarter. Running through a highly-ranked defense like it's not even there.

EDIT--Holy crap! An INT, safety, blocked FG, and blocked punt later, and Wisconsin's not looking so invincible anymore.
 
Last edited:
Even though Wisconsin lost it's still a possibility that we could play them. Though Michigan State would have to have a serious choke job.

I don't like hypothetical questions about who we'll play only because I personally find it to be wasted energy, I don't really care if other people do it. Having said that, what would it take for us to possibly play in the National Championship hypotheticallly.....assuming TT holds on to this victory.
 
Even though Wisconsin lost it's still a possibility that we could play them. Though Michigan State would have to have a serious choke job.

there is a Conference Championship game, and arent Wisconsin and MSU in opposite divisions?
 
there is a Conference Championship game, and arent Wisconsin and MSU in opposite divisions?

Wow, you are totally correct. I forgot about that, so yeah never mind that bit about MSU having to have a choke job.
 
pssht, Wheels asking me if Michigan State and Wisconsin are in opposite divisions when you know goddamn well they are. Smug bastard:lol:
 
lol no I just thought that was the case but was too lazy to look it up lol. I get way confused with the "Legends and Leaders" crap :)
 
Back
Top