That would be good. It would mean we hit on a pick in this year's draft.
Id much rather have that be the case and we do whatever moves later to balance positions - than we whiff on our pick and have uncrowded rotations again due to shit talent.
I should’ve extended on my concern. My concern that Reed will show to be a better ‘ready-now’ kind of player who can shoot and score. BUT I still think Scoot will be a better overall player and pure point guard down the line. So I would not want Reed overtaking Scoot as our starting PG because he needs all the minutes he can get, but I also don’t like playing him as SG and forcing Shae to SF.
If he’s there and he is the undisputed BPA, I’m all for it though. That’s kind of the beauty of this draft to me, I can be swayed into a bunch of different potential directions. You do have a point that we can rebalance positions when we find out what we have, so I’ll entertain the scenario.
Ant, Brogdon, and Thybulle,
maybe Grant (deadline?) would have to be out of here.
Scoot/Reed/Black
Shae/Black/Reed/Rupert
Grant/Camara/Kris/Black/Rupert
Camara/Walker/Kris/Rupert
DA/Missi/Reath
- I’ll use Ant for Black and the ‘25 DEN 1st + 2nds as a bare minimum return. I’d combine that asset
- I’m going to pretend we draft Missi—I know there will probably be better choice (I’m assuming Salun is gone by #14), but he would be a seamless fit at backup C and allow us to try DA in certain lineups.
- Thybulle and RW, I’d take any good veteran presence that can shoot in return. 2nds haven’t have been used yet in this scenario either.
My own overall thought: while I could definitely root for this team all 82 games, this seems like high floor, low ceiling. But having a high lotto pick and grabbing a blue chip forward would suddenly change everything.