Would you bring back Terry Stotts?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Would you bring back Terry Stotts?

  • Yes

    Votes: 34 54.8%
  • No

    Votes: 11 17.7%
  • Not sure yet.

    Votes: 17 27.4%

  • Total voters
    62
That's not going to happen though. Look what happened with Canales. He was never a realistic option as the head coach but he still left.

The op question wasn't guess what stotts would do if blazers offered x.

It was would you bring him back as head coach? my answer was no but he'd be welcome as offensive coordinator.
 
I'd base my opinion on the #1 offense in league.
This whole "Number One Offense" thing is a bunch of bunk.

To be the #1 offense you've gotta be ranked better than #19 in FG%:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/fieldGoalPct

Or if you want to adjust FG% for 3-pointers, then we rank #14 - otherwise known as AVERAGE:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/shootingEfficiency

If you want to make it a little more arcane in order to come up a couple more slots, then go ahead and use Points Per Shot and we're still only #11:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/scoringEfficiency

Just because we're #1 in shot attempts doesn't mean we've got the best offense in the league:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense/sort/fieldGoalsAttempted
 
Unreal. This team has completely overperformed and people are talking about replacing our coach? #grassisalwaysgreener
 
This whole "Number One Offense" thing is a bunch of bunk.

To be the #1 offense you've gotta be ranked better than #19 in FG%:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/fieldGoalPct

Or if you want to adjust FG% for 3-pointers, then we rank #14 - otherwise known as AVERAGE:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/shootingEfficiency

If you want to make it a little more arcane in order to come up a couple more slots, then go ahead and use Points Per Shot and we're still only #11:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense-per-game/sort/scoringEfficiency

Just because we're #1 in shot attempts doesn't mean we've got the best offense in the league:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/offense/sort/fieldGoalsAttempted

You're fantitude needs adjusting. Were number 1 damnit.
 
Remember our lockdown defensive coach, Rick Adelman? Man, I HATED that guy. What did he ever do for us?
 
Unreal. This team has completely overperformed and people are talking about replacing our coach? #grassisalwaysgreener

If they finish 7th or 8th, they will not have overperformed. They overperformed for the first half of the season, but the second half has been a disaster.
 
If they finish 7th or 8th, they will not have overperformed. They overperformed for the first half of the season, but the second half has been a disaster.

Wow. If you can't see the potential of Stotts' system by now, then I guess you'll be on the "Bring Back Nate" train.
 
So, in summation:

The team is in the throes of an epic collapse.
Stotts is a genius.
Olshey is a genius.
No player on this team should be traded unless they offer LeBron AND a couple of 1st round picks.

My head hurts.
 
If you think this season is a disaster, you missed the lockout season, that's for sure.
 
If you think this season is a disaster, you missed the lockout season, that's for sure.

BIG difference - people got fired, players got traded and there was a sense of accountability. I don't expect an unending supply of rainbows and unicorns - but when things go wrong, it is nice to see the franchise react. At this point, I would applaud if Stotts would just do something like insert TRob and Barton as starters. Just some feeble sign that the franchise cares.
 
At this point, I would applaud if Stotts would just do something like insert TRob and Barton as starters. Just some feeble sign that the franchise cares.
But the spacing! What about the spacing? Won't somebody please think of the SPACING!?!
4edd6dbb18613347e3000b36.jpg
 
BIG difference - people got fired, players got traded and there was a sense of accountability. I don't expect an unending supply of rainbows and unicorns - but when things go wrong, it is nice to see the franchise react. At this point, I would applaud if Stotts would just do something like insert TRob and Barton as starters. Just some feeble sign that the franchise cares.

He's trying to keep his job, not lose it.
 
Wow. If you can't see the potential of Stotts' system by now, then I guess you'll be on the "Bring Back Nate" train.

The potential of Stotts' system is the same as a Paul Westhead or a Mike D'Antoni. They bank it all on one facet of the game. For D'Antoni or Westhead it was all about pushing the tempo. Seven seconds or less to get the ball up the court. For Stotts it's all about the three pointer. They're both gimmicks. Name one team that has won a championship with a gimmick offense. We have the stars to be a San Antonio, but we're not running a San Antonio offense. We play very little defense and we rely too much on outside shots. When those shots aren't falling, our team is pretty damn bad.
 
Last edited:
The potential of Stotts' system is the same as a Paul Westhead or a Mike D'Antoni. They bank it all on one facet of the game. For D'Antoni or Westhead it was all about pushing the tempo. Seven seconds or less to get the ball up the court. For Stotts it's all about the three pointer. They're both gimmicks. Name one team that has won a championship with a gimmick offense. We have the stars to be a San Antonio, but we're not running a San Antonio offense. We play very little defense and we rely too much on outside shots. When those shots aren't falling, our team is pretty damn bad.

Probably a third of the teams in the league have the stars to play like San Antonio. I wonder why there's only one of them?
 
Probably a third of the teams in the league have the stars to play like San Antonio. I wonder why there's only one of them?

Really? A third of the league have arguably the best power forward in the game and an All-Star point guard who can get to the rim and shoot the three? Who are these other teams?
 
Really? A third of the league have arguably the best power forward in the game and an All-Star point guard who can get to the rim and shoot the three? Who are these other teams?

SA has aging stars past their prime and a bunch of role players. Yet they win at a huge clip. I guess your easy solution is to hire Gregg Popovich. M'kay.
 
SA has aging stars past their prime and a bunch of role players. Yet they win at a huge clip. I guess your easy solution is to hire Gregg Popovich. M'kay.

If we could.... fuck yes.

I've never understood how Paul's fortune hasn't played a larger role in bringing in the very best front office personnel. There's no salary cap for coaches. Offer Pop 100 million.
 
If we could.... fuck yes.

I've never understood how Paul's fortune hasn't played a larger role in bringing in the very best front office personnel. There's no salary cap for coaches. Offer Pop 100 million.
Pop has repeatedly stated his loyalty to the Spurs and most importantly to Duncan. He said when Duncan retires, he's done coaching
 
One of the things the Spurs have going for them is longevity of system and roster. Duncan gave up big money to resign Parker and Ginobli. Kobe wouldn't do that nor would Melo or many stars. I have a lot of respect for Pop and Duncan.
 
SA has aging stars past their prime and a bunch of role players. Yet they win at a huge clip. I guess your easy solution is to hire Gregg Popovich. M'kay.


Uh....didn't you just prove his point that Stotts isn't an elite coach?
 
Stotts is an innovative coach in my opinion and like Brooks, Spoelstra and several others, part of the new wave of NBA coaches. The guard is changing in the league and the style of play is as well. I think Stotts is ahead of the curve with his system and given stability, will eventually show how good he is. The guy doesn't panic. He's smart and he has a vision for the way the game should be played. I call him a keeper but I can't say that about the assistant coaches on the bench. That's where we need the upgrade.
 
Stotts is an innovative coach in my opinion and like Brooks, Spoelstra and several others, part of the new wave of NBA coaches. The guard is changing in the league and the style of play is as well. I think Stotts is ahead of the curve with his system and given stability, will eventually show how good he is. The guy doesn't panic. He's smart and he has a vision for the way the game should be played. I call him a keeper but I can't say that about the assistant coaches on the bench. That's where we need the upgrade.

Have to reply to this....

so the vision for the game should be played is to endlessly shoot the 3 ball regardless of them going in or not.
with Aldridge out did you not watch that? Most of them weren't even open.
for several games I watched three guards handle the ball.
run the pick and roll.
look for options.
when nothing appeared pass the ball off to the next guard.
Repeat.
That's certainly innovative and new age.
I will say offence will be a struggle without the player the offence is designed around.
But come on... Supposed to be an offensive guru.

do you really like watching Meyers Leonard get PT? what has he done to earn the playing time over claver/t-rob?
I hear looking like drift wood on the court is great for the team.
Giving up layups when he obviously has some athleticism to at least contest shots.
He wasn't the only problem in Charlotte but did you see Gary Neal drive to the bucket three times in a row and get layups on him?
You know Gary Neal... the jump shooter...
Playing Leonard is obviously innovative because he can "shoot" haven't seen it yet(besides at the line credit there he can make free throws)
What is he getting minutes because he has a "jumper"
(or so the M&M say he does. every time he misses a shot... or takes a three..."you don't mind him taking that, or he can make that")

However I don't know if playing Leonard is Stotts decision. Guy was a high draft pick #11 I believe...
Is he being told to play him to see if he isn't a complete bust? I haven't seen an improvement from last year to this...
Oh sorry.. he played well for what two games after he came back from his.....................sprained ankle...................
Thought he was turning the corner and figuring it out... But HA! was I wrong.
So maybe that isn't on Stotts. But he's the coach, he "decides" the rotation. Has to be on him for playing a player who obviously can't play.


Yes I'd bring Stotts back.. Simply because he overachieved this year.
But He better not let another collapse happen next year...
 
His third year is a team option. Interesting. The team is showing signs of life. Almost as if they are getting ready to peak. But I wonder if they were to continue to spiral out of control if they would seriously think about not opting in.

Lionell Hollins is still out there. And the fact that he isn't working makes me wonder if his eyes is on this position.
 
I think Hollins would be great as lead assistant right now, defensive coordinator just like Nate is in Indiana.
 
I think Hollins would be great as lead assistant right now, defensive coordinator just like Nate is in Indiana.

Hollins has a short fuse with players, that's why he lost his last job. That's how you damage a locker room. Stotts is an emotional rock, not easily fazed and not prone to mood swings. Hollins is a defensive specialist though, and it would be a good fit on the bench
 
Stotts is going to win 50 games in his second season as Blazers' coach. He isn't going anywhere. The team will pick up his option for 2014-15 barring some unforeseen surprise, such as a Pop or Phil Jackson deciding they want to coach in Portland. Getting rid of a coach who won 50 games is a huge risk. Stotts has earned his 3rd year, most definitely.
 
I can agree that Stotts has earned a 3rd year

Doesn't change my mind that the Blazers need to upgrade the head coaching position if they wish to win a championship.

Sorry, but his philosophies on both sides of the court are not conducive to winning a championship

No offense should ever rely on the 3pt shot

He either has the wrong system on defense or has the right one and can't teach it properly

Ultimately we'll see how the playoffs shake out. That will be the best way to gauge him. See what kind of adjustments he makes in a 7 game series after teams take away Portland's strengths.
 
I think he's done a decent enough job.

To any/all who are saying we should let him go, I ask whom would you replace him with? A coach who's currently unemployed? A coach who was just let go from another team?

And if Gregg Poppovich or Phil Jackson EVER coach a Portland Trailblazers team, I will buy everyone on this forum a pizza.
 
I can agree that Stotts has earned a 3rd year

Doesn't change my mind that the Blazers need to upgrade the head coaching position if they wish to win a championship.

Sorry, but his philosophies on both sides of the court are not conducive to winning a championship

No offense should ever rely on the 3pt shot

He either has the wrong system on defense or has the right one and can't teach it properly

Ultimately we'll see how the playoffs shake out. That will be the best way to gauge him. See what kind of adjustments he makes in a 7 game series after teams take away Portland's strengths.

Well said on all counts. I echo all these sentiments. Repped!
 
Pop or Phil Jackson .

I don't think Paul would be interested in either one of these guys. Actually I know he's not. He had a chance at one for two positions and he passed on him both times.

Paul is looking to make history not dig back into it. I'm sure he's just fine with Stotts. It's his guy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top