Majorball
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,182
- Likes
- 90
- Points
- 48
Who should they have gotten in 2013 that would have made a difference? nobody, they didn't make any moves because 2013 was a very shitty free agent class, and trades are simply not as fruitful as they once were.
So blaming Cashman or Hal is lame, I bet you can't name 1 move they could have done that would have made this team significantly better, let alone the 3-4 moves that were really needed.
2014 is a much better class, although the pitching is weak and that's really what they need, but make the bats better and they should be decent, and I have faith NY will do that.
Rusty do you feel that the decisions to go with Jeter at SS before Spring Training coming off severe ankle surgery wasn't a mistake. That they felt that Nunez was a adequate MLB SS for a season. That Suzuki in right field was the best they could do. That Cervelli and Stewart was a MLB caliber starting catcher. That trading for Vernon Wells was a good choice. Do you feel that Hafner was the best they could do for DH
It's about decision making, what YBlue is saying, and I think we all agree, is that there is never any accountability within the organization. The job of a GM is to be prepared. Granted that the injuries we had you can never plan for, but for example, Martin wanted to come back, the money he signed for in Pittsburgh was nothing for the Yankees. The organization said they were only interested in one year, why, if Sanchez, Murphy, or Romine arrive it would be 2015 before Sanchez would be ready. A two year contract was perfect but not for Cashman or whomever sits behind the curtain. DH, Ibanez was available after the 2012 season ended, it would have made sense to sign him if there was nothing better, but Hafner, not even Pasta would of have signed Hafner. Decisions once again. Now bring this 189 million mandate into the pic, real or not, and again this is what I feel YBlue is saying, Your either pregnant or not. So is the cap real or not. And what purpose does it serve by discussing it. There are advantages with being under, but a 3.3 billion business model I feel dictates other options and spending to maintain the brand is one of them.
Last edited: