BClutch
Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41
- Likes
- 1
- Points
- 8
Here's the article
Basically it says Rudy is awesome and we're not going to be able to keep him too long. I agree. Here's what I think we should do about it and why.
Rudy-Roy back-court is the only way Rudy's going to stay long term.
When you consider Rudy can do everything Blake can do, (bring the ball up, spot up three, same quality of one on one defense) and a lot he can't (post entry pass, create without the ball, run a fast break, transition defense) them both starting begins to sound much more reasonable. Many will point out Rudy/Roy will be out quickened by many point guards, but it's not like Blake can keep up with anyone and he still gets play at the point. Help defense can do a lot to cover one mismatch as long as everyone else is doing their job. If the point is a true threat like Rose, or CP there's no one player that can stop them anyway. Good defense isn't all about one on one. It's about team D, and Rudy has shown ability to play team ball all this season.
I don't see us getting anyone as our starting point guard that can do a better job than Rudy. Bayless may be our third combo guard of the future. If he becomes what many think he will he'd be the perfect fit with Roy and Rudy due to his quickness and hard play. Short term I could see us picking up a veteran guard to fill that spot (like Jason Kidd), or even using Blake off the bench til Bayless or whoever that third guard turns out to be is ready.
If this isn't going to happen the fact is we're going to be best served by trading Rudy. He's going to be that good, you could see it during crunch time against Houston and all throughout the season. You could also see that he's not happy being pulled at the end of games (which he shouldn't be, especially for Outlaw).
I don't want to see him get away.
It's time to start considering unconventional lineups.
Next up Joel + GO is the answer to our backup PF issue
okay, well maybe a banger will be nice while we're still waiting on Oden.
Basically it says Rudy is awesome and we're not going to be able to keep him too long. I agree. Here's what I think we should do about it and why.
Rudy-Roy back-court is the only way Rudy's going to stay long term.
When you consider Rudy can do everything Blake can do, (bring the ball up, spot up three, same quality of one on one defense) and a lot he can't (post entry pass, create without the ball, run a fast break, transition defense) them both starting begins to sound much more reasonable. Many will point out Rudy/Roy will be out quickened by many point guards, but it's not like Blake can keep up with anyone and he still gets play at the point. Help defense can do a lot to cover one mismatch as long as everyone else is doing their job. If the point is a true threat like Rose, or CP there's no one player that can stop them anyway. Good defense isn't all about one on one. It's about team D, and Rudy has shown ability to play team ball all this season.
I don't see us getting anyone as our starting point guard that can do a better job than Rudy. Bayless may be our third combo guard of the future. If he becomes what many think he will he'd be the perfect fit with Roy and Rudy due to his quickness and hard play. Short term I could see us picking up a veteran guard to fill that spot (like Jason Kidd), or even using Blake off the bench til Bayless or whoever that third guard turns out to be is ready.
If this isn't going to happen the fact is we're going to be best served by trading Rudy. He's going to be that good, you could see it during crunch time against Houston and all throughout the season. You could also see that he's not happy being pulled at the end of games (which he shouldn't be, especially for Outlaw).
I don't want to see him get away.

It's time to start considering unconventional lineups.
Next up Joel + GO is the answer to our backup PF issue
okay, well maybe a banger will be nice while we're still waiting on Oden.

