Your preferred PG direction

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PtldPlatypus

Let's go Baby Blazers!
Staff member
Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
34,409
Likes
43,895
Points
113
Rank these PGOTF options in your order of preference (these are in my preferred order:

  1. Trade Joel for Sessions
  2. Draft Nolan Smith (or some other college PG not named Kyrie Irving)
  3. Petteri Koponen
  4. Trade Miller for Harris
  5. Armon Johnson
  6. Patty Mills
  7. Rudy Fernandez
  8. Other reasonable option (please specify)

Anyone want to play?
 
I think that what Miller does for Aldridge this year makes it very hard to trade him.

I would still love to improve the backup PG with someone that is younger than Miller and possibly has a longer shelf life.

I would still love to see Capt. Kirk as our backup PG - and mentioned it before - give the Wiz some cap relief with a Joel/Kirk based package - maybe something like Joel/Babbit for Kirk/Hilton Armstrong.
 
1. resignmiller for 3 years

2. trade for harris

3. thats it
 
If we can get Sessions for JPEC, that's far and away my top choice. Miller and Sessions would be a very high-level point guard rotation and Sessions can be groomed as the PGOTF for whenever Miller fades. There's no cost to the present (we retain Miller for a playoff run) and a possible future payoff.
 
I would still love to see Capt. Kirk as our backup PG - and mentioned it before - give the Wiz some cap relief with a Joel/Kirk based package - maybe something like Joel/Babbit for Kirk/Hilton Armstrong.

I like this--but would the Wiz go for it?
 
If we can get Sessions for JPEC, that's far and away my top choice. Miller and Sessions would be a very high-level point guard rotation and Sessions can be groomed as the PGOTF for whenever Miller fades. There's no cost to the present (we retain Miller for a playoff run) and a possible future payoff.

I agree. IMO the team for this season needs to look at upgrading the bench, and for as little costs as possible. If we could add a PG for the bench unit that was worth a damn, it could be huge for the stability of the team with the 2nd unit with Roy coming back. The team needs to eliminate these stretches where the 2nd unit comes in and blows the whole lead that was gained, or puts the team behind the 8 ball for trying to come back and win. I don't know about you, but when Patty Mills comes in the game I cringe.
 
If we can get Sessions for JPEC, that's far and away my top choice. Miller and Sessions would be a very high-level point guard rotation and Sessions can be groomed as the PGOTF for whenever Miller fades. There's no cost to the present (we retain Miller for a playoff run) and a possible future payoff.

This the direction I would prefer to see Cho go with. Second to that is trading Miller for Harris ... beyond that I'm not sure I like any of the choices laid out in the OP.
 
Re-sign Dre, find the PGotF in the draft and let him develop. Dre's game is grounded and he uses his smarts to make plays, so I can see him playing upto his 40s without too much of a dropoff.

I like Devin Harris, but Dre is currently better than him at essentially every aspect of the game (except for defense, when Harris tries). And given his durability issues, I don't like that exchange as much as I thought I did before.
 
This team and drafting a PGOtF in the same sentence makes me cringe.
 
The one thing about Harris I like is his ability to explode to the hole. He is quick. But because of the toll that driving to the basket takes on a small player's body, he doesn't seem to do it very often anymore. I could be wrong. I don't watch a lot of NJ games. Miller seems to do everything else as good if not better.

My gut tells me to stick with Miller through next year, and quickly find that PGOTF. Not sure if Harris is that long term guy either. So regardless of who we trade for, keep Andre.
 
Re-sign Dre, find the PGotF in the draft and let him develop. Dre's game is grounded and he uses his smarts to make plays, so I can see him playing up to his 40s without too much of a dropoff.

This is pretty much my position as well. Let Dre ball here for as long as he's willing. We're not going to suffer if he loses speed or leaping ability.
 
This is pretty much my position as well. Let Dre ball here for as long as he's willing. We're not going to suffer if he loses speed or leaping ability.

Considering that Jason Kidd added a jump shot late in his career, it is never to late to become a weapon from the outside, as well.
 
Considering that Jason Kidd added a jump shot late in his career, it is never to late to become a weapon from the outside, as well.

C'mon--yeah, he got better after he got to Dallas, but it's not as if he hasn't taken lots of jump shots his whole career. You do know that he's third on the all-time 3-pointers made list, right? That doesn't happen because of just 2-3 years of proficiency.
 
C'mon--yeah, he got better after he got to Dallas, but it's not as if he hasn't taken lots of jump shots his whole career. You do know that he's third on the all-time 3-pointers made list, right? That doesn't happen because of just 2-3 years of proficiency.

Yep, but that doesn't make him a good shooter. He was more of a "timely 3" guy before that. Put it this way. If he was taking a 3 against us in the first 8 years of his career, I was a happy camper. There is a huge difference between number of 3's made, and 3 point percentage. When you play 16 years, you get a lot of chances. Also note, that Jason still has problems if his feet are not set. He is a set shooter instead of a jump shooter from the outside. If his feet are set, he hits them well, but not so much if he gets turned into a jump shooter. That is why it reminded me of Miller. Miller never gets off the ground. But a 3 point set shot like Jason has now, would greatly enhance his total game, and the spacing for the Blazers.
 
Re-sign Dre, find the PGotF in the draft and let him develop. Dre's game is grounded and he uses his smarts to make plays, so I can see him playing upto his 40s without too much of a dropoff.

I like Devin Harris, but Dre is currently better than him at essentially every aspect of the game (except for defense, when Harris tries). And given his durability issues, I don't like that exchange as much as I thought I did before.

I vote for this.
 
Hey we are going to get to see Wesley and Brandon Jennings play together in the rookie-sophomore game. Nothing like a test drive right? Yes I am kidding.
 
Hey we are going to get to see Wesley and Brandon Jennings play together in the rookie-sophomore game. Nothing like a test drive right? Yes I am kidding.
Heh. From CP3 and Roy in the Sunday game to Wes and Jennings in the rookie game. Man, we're going in the wrong direction. (And isn't it just ironic that CP is now bone-on-bone in one knee without a meniscus?)
 
Heh. From CP3 and Roy in the Sunday game to Wes and Jennings in the rookie game. Man, we're going in the wrong direction. (And isn't it just ironic that CP is now bone-on-bone in one knee without a meniscus?)

Ack I had not heard that. Fuck I hate seeing good basketball players going out via injury.
 
http://bkref.com/tiny/hvy8V

I'm a little shocked by the per game averages. But really, this is why I want to keep Andre; he seems to have the will and the way to stay exceptionally useful for a long time.
 
forencich-sam-utah-jazz-v-portland-trail-blazers-deron-williams.jpg


:devilwink:
 
No rookie PG's! For this team to be a contender down the road I think you have to look at a young vet who can step in right away.
 
Man, I LOVE Derron Williams, the total package. He will NOT re-sign in Utah, I would love to get him.
 
Man, I LOVE Derron Williams, the total package. He will NOT re-sign in Utah, I would love to get him.

If they were in a different division, I think we'd be serious contenders. Given our history with the Jizz (their fans HATE us), there would be a lot of collateral damage for the Utah ownership if they dealt with us.
 
Sergio naturally, Kyle Lowery, Luke Ridnour, Kirk Hinrich.

I left out most top guys like Paul or Williams because I don't want to see us trade anyone out of our 6-8 guys who have been playing so well together right now. I'd like to see us build on that.

I'd make available for trade Roy, Oden, Joel, Camby, Babbitt, Marks, and a blank check from PA.
 
Sergio naturally, Kyle Lowery, Luke Ridnour, Kirk Hinrich.

I left out most top guys like Paul or Williams because I don't want to see us trade anyone out of our 6-8 guys who have been playing so well together right now. I'd like to see us build on that.

I'd make available for trade Roy, Oden, Joel, Camby, Babbitt, Marks, and a blank check from PA.

Your obsession with Sergio knows no bounds.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top