<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (blazerspwnu @ Jan 1 2007, 08:14 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I disagree that elton brand is a better basketball player than zach randolph. Other than sharing the same position, dirk and zach play different styles, so they're hard to compare. I havent seen Gasol play in a while so I dont really remember him.
if you judge whether a player should make the all star team by how many wins their team has, then Paul Pierce, Allen Iverson (losses came w/ him still on 76rs), chris bosh, Pau Gasol, and Kevin Garnett shouldnt be considered all stars.</div>
First of all, you don't think Elton Brand is a better basketball player than Zach Randolph? I'm sorry, but LMAO. How is Brand NOT a better player? Both are excellent post players and both can shoot it from mid-range, but Brand is BETTER in the post and he is BETTER from mid-range. He's a better rebounder, he's stronger, he's a MUCH better leader, and most of all - Randolph is not a good defender at all, Elton Brand is a very good defender as well as one of the best shot blockers in the league. Brand is also a class-act, and a face of the franchise kind of guy. Randolph has off-court issues (not like a parking ticket either, we are talking in trouble with the law involved drugs and guns), he misses practice, he has had weight problems, he's more injury prone, he's somewhat of a ball hog, and he has had his issues with the coaching staff. To say that Zach Randolph is better than Elton Brand is just absurd, and I'm sure every member on BBW would agree with me (at least, I hope so, jeez).
Also, sure, the guys you listed (Pierce, Iverson in Philly, Bosh, Gasol, and Garnett) have been on losing teams, but they are on a whole different level than Zach Randolph. They are all franchise players, all superstars, all guys that are considered some of the best players in the entire league. Any GM that has ever been involved with the NBA would take any of those guys over Zach Randolph to build a team with.