2008 GM Draft 1 Peer Evaluation Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Not better than my starting 5:

PG: Jameer Nelson
SG: Deshawn Stevenson's Beard
SF: Joe Johnson
PF: Drew Gooden's Beard
C: Dwight Howard

Fuckin awesome, best team ever.
 
Yeah I was gonna say, I don't like JJ at SF. IMO you got Dwight and then ruined it.
 
Edit: NVM, you're a douche bag, KC.



Jigga, I respect your opinion, but my team would still own yours.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Aug 9 2008, 03:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>NVM, you guys are douche bags</div>


Nice of a mod to call people douche bags.
 
PG-Baron Davis
SG-Ben Gordon
SF- Yi Jianlian / Mickael Pietrus (can back up both the 2 and 3 spot)

PF-David West
C -Brendan Haywood


any thoughts?!?!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 9 2008, 05:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Aug 9 2008, 03:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>NVM, you guys are douche bags</div>


Nice of a mod to call people douche bags.
</div>

Well not Jigga, just you are.


You still love me tho.
 
Oklahoma City starting 5 (currently):

Sessions
Martin
Granger
Villanueva
Bynum
 
I dont know anything about Sessions, but the rest of that lineup is pretty good.

Athletic wings that can defend and shoot in Kevin Martin and Granger. Then you got two types of bigs, one that specializes inside the paint, the other outside of it and is able to run the court well.
 
Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
 
I'm interested in seeing how Sessions does this year. He only played in 17 games last year. He started 7 games, and the Bucks lost every one. Hard to put a lot of stock in his numbers last year, IMO. But those assist numbers are mighty impressive, anyways.

He's not a guy I would want leading a team at this point, I think.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
</div>

Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Aug 9 2008, 09:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm interested in seeing how Sessions does this year. He only played in 17 games last year. He started 7 games, and the Bucks lost every one. Hard to put a lot of stock in his numbers last year, IMO. But those assist numbers are mighty impressive, anyways.

He's not a guy I would want leading a team at this point, I think.</div>

That's why i hoped he would fall so I could use him as a backup...I think as a backup it wouldn't be asking for much, but would still allow him the time to prove himself and produce.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
</div>

Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
</div>

Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

kthxbai
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JFizzleRaider @ Aug 10 2008, 12:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
</div>

Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
</div>

Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

kthxbai
</div>


Why? They are both combo guards who cant run the point, and undersized for the SG position at 6'4 (Roy) and 6'3(Ellis). Can you tell me why they aren't comparable please?
 
NO WAY in hell Roy is 6'6.

But if he is I will now shut my mouth then.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 10 2008, 06:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JFizzleRaider @ Aug 10 2008, 12:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Aug 9 2008, 09:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Aug 9 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Sessions was one of the three young guards I was considering when I selected Westbrook. Great pick imho.
Ramon is certainly a good pass-first PG, But im not sure he should be your starting PG though.</div>

yeah, but I figure with Martin, Granger, Villanueva and Bynum, my point doesn't really need to score much, just be a capable passer, which Sessions definitely is. He'll also be great on the break, and this team should run a lot.
</div>

Btw great trade deal you got man. Granger and 6th for Ellis and 9th?! Awesome.
Ellis isnt really a PG anyway. Hes kinda like Brandon Roy at the 2 IMO.
</div>

Please don't compare Monta Ellis and Brandon Roy

kthxbai
</div>


Why? They are both combo guards who cant run the point, and undersized for the SG position at 6'4 (Roy) and 6'3(Ellis). Can you tell me why they aren't comparable please?
</div>

Brandon Roy can run the point and will be doing so next year when Bayless is on the court with him.
 
Farmar will now start at point guard, I'll let Sessions develop a little bit, and Farmar will be a great sixth man in a couple years when Sessions takes over.
 
i am actually excited how the blazers will pan out with bayless playin PG on the defense but the 2 on offense
 
I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

He's a solid pick. I don't know about complete steal. Where do you think he should have went/who do you think he should have gone over?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

Considering that he fights with Outlaw for floor time, that either says something about where he got picked or where Outlaw got picked.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (lukewarmplay @ Aug 10 2008, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (J_Ray @ Aug 10 2008, 11:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think Martell Webster is a complete steal this far down in the draft, and he still has plenty of potential still to be fulfilled. He should be a great 6th man that can play SG or SF when Mike Miller or King James goes out.</div>

Considering that he fights with Outlaw for floor time, that either says something about where he got picked or where Outlaw got picked.
</div>

Outlaw is the better individual player, it's just that he can't play within and team and contribute in other ways than scoring as well as Webster can.

With that said, I think Webster was a good pick, not a steal at this point.

Gomes got taken in the same area and I think both of them are similar level players.
 
Ok starting lineup finally complete for the Lakers

PG: Derek Fisher, SG: Dwayne Wade, SF: Jamario Moon, PF: Lamar Odom, CE: Tyson Chandler

Bench: Eddie House
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top