They started 1-5, climbed to 4-5, lost two and a row, and have now climbed back to 6-7.
My point was, for a team full of older players with a history of missing significant time, playing them big minutes in early November does not bode well for their long term success. We all know CP3's history. He's 33 now and averaging the most minutes (35.2 MPG) since his first season as a Clipper, seven years age at the age of 26. The last two seasons, he's averaged 31.2 and 31.8 MPG, and even then only managed to play in 61 and 58 games. How can D'Antoni possibly think playing him 35.2 MPG in early November is a good plan?
Same for Eric Gordon. He's currently averaging 32.7 MPG, the most since he was in NOP, when he averaged 32.9 MPG and only managed to play in 45 games. Since his rookie year, he's averaged > 32 MPG six times. In those six seasons, he's played in 62, 56, 9, 64, 61 and 45 games. Playing Eric Gordon > 32 MPG has, historically, not been a good plan.
It just seems like D'Antoni is juggling a ticking time bomb playing his top five players so many minutes early in the season.
Here's two teams' top 5 players in minutes per game so far this season:
View attachment 23317View attachment 23318
The one on the left is MIN. Their coach, Tom Thibodeau, has a reputation for playing his starters into the ground. His top five players are 29, 23, 23, 30 and 30.
The team on the right, is HOU. Their top 5 players are 33, 29, 33, 24 and 30.
Do you think HOU's current minutes distribution is sustainable over the course of an 82 game schedule? Given the history of the players involved, I do not. I think Mike D'Antoni, in his desperation to turn things around, may be trading a few early season wins for a potential disaster down the road.
BNM