Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chicago has 38. Why do you believe it's that one? I would guess it's a team with multiple picks whereas 38 (from NO) is all that CHI has.I think it’s pick 38
I think CJ and what not gets traded to Philly for Ben Simmons in a couple of weeks
Chicago has 38. Why do you believe it's that one? I would guess it's a team with multiple picks whereas 38 (from NO) is all that CHI has.
Teams with multiple seconds:
OKC: 34, 36, 55
DET: 37, 42, 52
NY: 32, 58
NO: 35, 43, 51
CHA: 56, 57
IND: 54, 60
PHI: 50, 53
i think it ruins it for the players more than anybody else. this is their big moment and they learn it via twitter or text from agents.
who knows? maybe some prefer it that way.
i dont think we have the pieces to land a lottery as i doubt we would involve CJ.Chances that we are the mystery team? 50/50?
i think it ruins it for the players more than anybody else. this is their big moment and they learn it via twitter or text from agents.
who knows? maybe some prefer it that way.
lolone of the moderators should stop eating donuts and cruising around Pornhub long enough to pin this thread to the top of the page
and...is the Westminster Kennel Show Sly's version of Pornhub?
Maybe in a three way but if the Pacers move Turner it's to put Sabonis at the 5 not to bring in a 5 that has more redundancies with Sabonis than Turner does. IMOheres the one trade blazers will make:
- jusuf nurkic for myles turner
Then you turn around and trade Nurk for another nice piece. That might make Dame happy... it's not as flashy as some other possibilities but it could work.Tj warren and myles turner for cj McCollum
I'm just not seeing the Sabonis/Nurk front court working. Maybe I'm missing something. Why do you like it? (No snark at all intended)CJ & Nurk for:
Turner
Warren & Lamb
The obvious reason they don't get us the team's picks ASAP is that companies have paid big bucks for us to tune in and watch their advertisements. Ratings = ESPN's $what you don’t sit around for three hours to listen to stephen A’s (or whoever they have on there) wonderful analysis and the fashion show?
Just for you--done.one of the moderators should stop eating donuts and cruising around Pornhub long enough to pin this thread to the top of the page
and...is the Westminster Kennel Show Sly's version of Pornhub?
They are both good passing bigs and Sabonis I view as a legit 4 that can streatch.I'm just not seeing the Sabonis/Nurk front court working. Maybe I'm missing something. Why do you like it? (No snark at all intended)
Turner is definitely the more athletic big type that maybe Dame drooled over ?Then you turn around and trade Nurk for another nice piece. That might make Dame happy... it's not as flashy as some other possibilities but it could work.
But if the primary appeal is the announcement of the pick, you still get that, it's just announced earlier. Watch if you like the analysis and what not, but otherwise, IMO, it's a means to an end, and I'd rather just know who is picked where without lengthy discussions of wingspan and upside.Also ruins the watching experience. Those of us who've been watching the draft since the pre-Twitter days can tell you that a big amount of the appeal and enjoyment was the actual announcement of the picks... sort of like opening a present.
Knowing what's in the present before you open it is a lot less fun...
Maybe Dame's talking about his teammate now McGee?Turner is that athletic/mobile big that Dame wants…
