LayneStaley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 6,569
- Likes
- 7,220
- Points
- 113
Last time I brought this up a few guys posted paragraphs about how I was wrong. Nurk is mediocre at best.Dude your not exactly going out on a limb there lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last time I brought this up a few guys posted paragraphs about how I was wrong. Nurk is mediocre at best.Dude your not exactly going out on a limb there lol
Until Sharpe's handle improves, he needs others to create for him. That's the biggest thing he needs to work on, imhoSharpe just made a three pointer but hey, let's have Winslow be our second option.
Wow KP has a squad he built for the Pacers. Great Gm
Turner is better than Nurk, don’t care what anyone says.
him, sharpe, and mathurin are a very solid canadian representation in this draft class.Nembhard was a good pick. Just a solid PG. Nothing flashy just plays solid basketball
they're different players.He is, especially right now with Nurk out of shape. I think Turner would be better with this Blazer team.
turner is whiteside esque in that aspect and is continually frustrated when he doesn't get the kickback for the pick and pop.As usual, he doesn’t get enough credit for it, but perfect screen by Nurk to give Dame that open three. He is an excellent screener.
This is a very solid point.Turner makes 5mil a year more. He should be better. Question is, you wanna pay him the max he thinks he's worth next year?
Last time I brought this up a few guys posted paragraphs about how I was wrong. Nurk is mediocre at best.
Nembhard was a good pick. Just a solid PG. Nothing flashy just plays solid basketball
Turner makes 5mil a year more. He should be better. Question is, you wanna pay him the max he thinks he's worth next year?