You might want to go back and look closer.
bullshit....you quoted my response to a post about Cason Wallace, not one about Camara
you then had to go back and find an earlier post, made 7 weeks ago, to justify your fuck up
as for who had a better season:
PER: Camara 10.6....Scoot 9.5
TS%: Camara .547....Scoot .489
FG%: Camara .450....Scoot .385
3ptFG%: Camara .337....Scoot .325
2ptFG%: Camara .523....Scoot .416
winshares: Camara +2.0....Scoot -1.7
winshares/48: Camara +.055....Scoot -.045
BPM: Camara -3.1....Scoot -5.8
offensive rating: Camara 110...Scoot 97
defensive rating: Camara 117....Scoot 120
draft position: Camara #52....Scoot #3
obviously, Camara is a better at rebounding (
and defense) while Scoot is better at assists (
when he wasn't passing the ball to opponents or the audience)
something else: When Camara was on the floor, the aggregate offensive rating of Blazers/Opponents was a +9.2 points. When Scoot was on the floor his team net was -8.2 points.
so yeah, I can argue that Camara had a better season. Obviously, if all you care about is raw production without the context of efficiency and impact on the team, you'd point at Scoot's PPG and APG. But he was a terrible shooter last season and he averaged 3.4 turnovers (
4.3 per 36). And of course his raw numbers were higher, he had a usage rate of 26.5% vs Camara at 13.8%; and he averaged 6.6 more FG's to score 6.5 more points
who will be better in the future is the more pertinent question since these all-rookie teams are just another NBA sideshow. Scoot definitely has the higher ceiling and upside. I'd say it's pretty likely he'll end up much better....assuming in dramatically improves his shooting and assist/turnover rate. I'd say that's probable but nor certain
I know this is where you'll get all dismissive about stats and too long a post. Tough shit....I don't care