But if they have ending contracts in the near future, it's not that big of a deal. Having vets on the team is not a negative. IMO Grant's age/contract is the only one that is essential to move.
Ending contracts for Ayton and Ant can be just as valuable as they can be negative. So IMO this whole "2 timeline" concern is over-scrutinized. Other than Grant, everyone else is 26 or younger.
(except Williams who doesn't play and is 27) It is laughable to me that they are considered on a different timeline when they haven't even hit their prime.
And as we saw last two games, Scoot and Sharpe are progressing just fine alongside the "older players".
Trade them or keep them, it makes very little difference. (other than Grant)