3 GOP candidates speak at a convention where the promoter wants death penalty for gays

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BTW... I don't like any of these candidates at all. There is no incentive to defend them, but I get pissed when Kingspeed uses hyperbole like this.

Don't worry Mags. The supply of hyperbole is not going to run out, you'll still be able to use enormous amounts yourself.

barfo
 
Don't worry Mags. The supply of hyperbole is not going to run out, you'll still be able to use enormous amounts yourself.

barfo

Did you know that "magnification" is a synonym for "hyperbole?"
 
Don't worry Mags. The supply of hyperbole is not going to run out, you'll still be able to use enormous amounts yourself.

barfo
But my hyperbole is to exploit the evil Democrat Party so it is for good. ;)
 
If NAMBLA has a Blazer viewing party you would go because you like the Blazers and I would avoid it and laugh at you for going because I think NAMBLA is disgusting.
Don't diss the north American Marlon Brando look alike organization. It's top notch
 
I was going to go with National Ambidextrous Masturbators and Butt Lickers Association, but held back because it was too crude.

Oops.
If that's what it means then sly would actually love it. We all know what he will do for some sweet peanut butter
 
What wasn't original title? I just said they attended the conference. Also it's not death penalty TOWARDS gays. It's death penalty FOR gays.
 
Learning more about this, it wasn't just literature, a speaker called for the death penalty for the gays and then the 3 GOP candidates still showed up and spoke at the event. The guy who made that awful speech introduced these GOP candidates and they still spoke at the event. Crazy. I'm watching the death penalty for gays speech now. People actually applauded. Scary. Says gay people should be rounded up and executed.

Watching more, these views were no secret before the event. The guy has said stuff like this before.
 
Last edited:
what a dumb fucking straw man argument. And here you are still dodging my first question. Did they say that? If they didn't then change the fucking title to "3 GOP candidates speak at a convention where the promoter wants death penalty towards gays"

Then we can make fun of them for being stupid enough to be a part of it. What we cannot do is say they said that
I never said they said it. And they never did say it. But why on earth did they participate in this event? It's like going to a KKK event. You may not say racist things but why attend it?
 
could you imagine the shit storm that Fox News and Rush limbaugh would be doing if this was something Bernie Sanders or Clinton went to?
 
I never said they said it. And they never did say it. But why on earth did they participate in this event? It's like going to a KKK event. You may not say racist things but why attend it?
Because they are nut jobs right wing religious buffs or patronizing those votes. Pretty silly if you ask me.

It's no different than Hillary taking support from Muslims that live in Shariah law and say she is at war for women's rights. Or when she says she will sock it to the banks yet accept millions of dollars in support from them.

It's a funny political world we live in.
 
could you imagine the shit storm that Fox News and Rush limbaugh would be doing if this was something Bernie Sanders or Clinton went to?
Well Bernie did honeymoon in the Soviet Union, praise Fidel Castro and support Nicaragua.
 
Well Bernie did honeymoon in the Soviet Union, praise Fidel Castro and support Nicaragua.

And you did honeymoon in, according to your political definitions (Social Democrats = Socialism = Communism) , in a communist country and on top of that you committed a crime in that country so that makes you not only a communist but a criminal.
 
And you did honeymoon in, according to your political definitions (Social Democrats = Socialism = Communism) , in a communist country and on top of that you committed a crime in that country so that makes you not only a communist but a criminal.
Huh??? I'm just using your failed logic on Bernie. Sorry it doesn't fit your agenda
 
Huh??? I'm just using your failed logic on Bernie. Sorry it doesn't fit your agenda

You went to France, France has some socialist policies, according to you that makes them communist. Also you put a lock on that bridge which France asked people not to do and said it was vandalizing. Vandalizing is a criminal act.

Mags, international communist criminal!
 
My grandmother visited China in the 80's, she's obviously a commie!
 
You went to France, France has some socialist policies, according to you that makes them communist. Also you put a lock on that bridge which France asked people not to do and said it was vandalizing. Vandalizing is a criminal act.

Mags, international communist criminal!

Wait...do tell about this bridge locking incident.
 
You went to France, France has some socialist policies, according to you that makes them communist. Also you put a lock on that bridge which France asked people not to do and said it was vandalizing. Vandalizing is a criminal act.

Mags, international communist criminal!

Shouldn't we ban Mags for that? It's people like him that are destroying the moral fabric of this board.

barfo
 
You went to France, France has some socialist policies, according to you that makes them communist. Also you put a lock on that bridge which France asked people not to do and said it was vandalizing. Vandalizing is a criminal act.

Mags, international communist criminal!
Well that's good news then. I guess this entire thread is moot then since it doesn't matter where you go as a reflection of your ideology.
 
Well that's good news then. I guess this entire thread is moot then since it doesn't matter where you go as a reflection of your ideology.

Only a communist criminal would say something like that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top