66 & 67 on the books! Good for Oregon

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yes, yes, we know - everyone is ignorant but you. At least we don't have time to post over 9,000 (!) times on this board. Your alleged intelligence is either strangely prioritized, misused, or BS. I know what I think, but whatever the case, it's kind of a joke given that you spend all day . . . here.

As for my posting, I simply think and type more quickly than others. I spend a lot of time on boring conference calls, and this forum is an interesting diversion. I'm also an insomniac, and most of my posts are at night after the wife and boy are asleep. Still, it's awfully nice of you to care.

But let's get back to my comment about Sug--not about everyone, just Sug. There are plenty of bright people on this board. But when someone says something ignorant, I'll call them out on it. If I made a stupid point about law, wouldn't you take issue with it? You're an attorney who clearly knows the US legal system better than I. I would have no problem taking a rebuke from someone who knew more about the law. You'll also note that Sug never provided an answer to what about the field of economic theory was gobbledygook.

As for your opinion of me, I guess I'll have to live with your disappointment. Thanks for caring, JayRose.
 
Sorry, I don't have time to play your reindeer games all day today, so be my guest, have the last word.

(Note: Never get in a flame war with someone who has too much time on their hands - in the middle of the night, or day apparently!)
 
Sorry, I don't have time to play your reindeer games all day today, so be my guest, have the last word.

(Note: Never get in a flame war with someone who has too much time on their hands - in the middle of the night, or day apparently!)

Yet, you still respond. Nice try, JayRose, but I've seen these debating tactics before. I love the ad hominem attack; it's like waving a white flag.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top