9/11 Conspiracy?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

that is some scary stuffI would hope to god that our country wouldn't stoop to as low as what this website is indicating. But then again you never know....
 
I'm not leaning either way, because sites like this that just show everything from one perspective tend to bend the truth and omit critical facts, I'd really like to hear someone defend the U.S. on the matter and then I'll make up my mind.
 
It's all a bunch of garbage. 1. If 9/11 was a coverup it would involve hundreds of people. If this were true someone would spill the beans and bring this to light. No way could they keep a coverup this big secret and no way could that many people keep that inside them without feeling extreme guilt. 2. These people who think the goverment did it cannot make a formal story of the events. All they do is find a few random things and they don't tell you how everything happened. For example. They think a missile was used to hit the Pentagon They think bombs exploded the WTC's after the planes hit They think the goverment shot down the plane in Pennsylvania. For a terrorist attack this all makes little sense. Why would the WTC be hit by airplanes and the the Pentagon hit by a missile? Where did the U.S. Airlines plane have gone if it didn't hit the Pentagon? Why did hundreds of people report seeing a U.S. Airlines plane hit the Pentagon? 3. If bombs were used to bring down the WTC wouldn't the thousands of people that work in the WTC notice this? Wouldn't security notice this or figure it out? Their is no proof of any of this and these conspiracy people are out of their minds regarding 9/11. If anyone here wants to debate me on this bring it.
 
They didn't say that about the missile, it was just stated as a theory. They didn't say a plane didn't hit either, they just said that it would have been very difficult for someone to execute that manueveur. I personally don't agree with that part of the article either.I don't think that explosives were used in the destruction of either building, although what they say does make sense. The towers did follow the path of maximum resistance when they collapsed, but it was also the logical way for it to happen. If the buillding's frame was damaged where the plane impacted, then the section directly above the plane would fall directly down, it wouldn't go to the side if there was nothing to support it from below.I'm not saying that all of their points are valid, because some are illogical and far-fetched, but they do make some reasonable points. I also wasn't saying that I agree with this, I was simpy posting the page for discussion and presenting it as a possibility.
 
I have been to all these sites and posted some of their random theories. Fools.
 
Well the war in Iraq was clearly only motivated by oil and money, but I don't know if Bush would go as far as to kill his own citizens.
 
Thats crazy. But i feel Bush new about this. everything seemed to easy for them.
 
Al-Qaeda has been trained by the CIA, they know what we do, they are not stupid. They know what they are doing. For coming here and not knowing the language very well they are effcient.
 
I didn't open the link, but if this is about the pentagon thing, where they say it's a rocket instead of a plane, it's <Censored>. They took the pics of the wreckage after it was cleaned up. My brothers friend went to DC and saw the plane wreckage there.
 
You can't tell these conspiracy people otherwise, they don't listen when people tell them they are wrong. When a plane hits the Pentagon at that speed and goes into the building their is not going to be much wreckage outside because of how fast it was going. Same reason wreckage didn't fly out of the WTC's when it crashed.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nba dogmatist @ Mar 21 2006, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I didn't open the link, but if this is about the pentagon thing, where they say it's a rocket instead of a plane, it's <Censored>. They took the pics of the wreckage after it was cleaned up. My brothers friend went to DC and saw the plane wreckage there.</div>I said don't post if you didn't read, because they didn't say that.
 
But 'no plane wreckage' is on almost all those websites and it's laughable.
dry.gif
 
Well they're retards and I wouldn't post a link to something which obviously isn't true.
 
Alright...I found the movie...what a looney bunch. If you agree with these conspiracies post them here for debate.
 
Their is nothing to think about...bring up any point you are unclear about and I can prove them wrong. I didn't watch the video but it's the same group of loonies that makes the websites.
 
Neither side has hard evidence to prove the other wrong. You cant prove a conspiracy theorist wrong and a conspiracy theorist cant prove you wrong. Its all about what you believe.
 
No Ace O Spades...the conspiracy theorists are wrong. :biggrin:We have common sense, scientific evidence, and non-loonies on our side.They have nothing and they use half truths to confuse people and they never actually debate people that disagree with them.
 
Just like I said Man is Very Greedy and Bush just everytime I see him talking it just sounds like all lies to me
 
Most people like myself hear Bush and it's all, 'blah blah blah blah.' :closedeyes:
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ Mar 21 2006, 09:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No Ace O Spades...the conspiracy theorists are wrong. :biggrin:</div>If its at all possible to be in the middle, thats where I layI dont think that government orchestrated a plan such as this but I feel that its impossible that an attack of this magnitude could go undetected
 
How is it not possible? The plot was regulated to a handfull of devoted people. It's completley logical.
 
Yes, we spent billions on fake rocket ships so we could spend millions training astronauts how to not do anything and fake their jobs. Then we faked a rocket launch which was shot in L.A. Duh Blaze, come on.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top