Yep, error is correct.
I'm probably more of an Independent these days, but I've always been for the least amount of government as "possible". If the people - as a whole - could just step up and do what's right (relatively speaking), we could have just that. Ain't gonna happen, though. That's why we end up getting more and more government - to help do the work of/for the unwilling/incompetent/criminal/illegal.........
I think we might be seeing things close to the same. I don't see government
size as the issue. I see who has an unequal amount of
power as the problem.
the super religious, the super conservative, the corrupt and the super rich.
I know people like to say the "liberals" are "ruining America" and have a lot of power, but they aren't and they don't. Who is a big powerful liberal and what have they done that is so bad?
I know "obamacare" is a talking points response, but I think a lot of that is anecdotal PLUS it wasn't really a "liberal" driven policy. AND its odd how the cost of the wars (one of which was totally unnecessary and
actually against republican and conservative theory) are much easier for some to swallow then trying to get health care for those who need it.
The programs that people complain about (read: blame on liberals) tend to be smaller costs then the volume of the argument should be. That's not to say there haven't been wasteful or poorly run programs suggested by and passed by more liberal politicians. But they're an easy target to distract people from what really causes government issues.
I think it's similar to seeing someone who constantly buys new cars, on credit, and is continually living on credit debt. Then their younger brother decides he wants to buy something on his credit card and they flip out and act like their brother is being irresponsible and he should handle all his budget issues for him. So he creates a month long budget for him to follow, but it cancels his dish, health insurance, he'll have to start shopping at the discount food store instead of a local store, limiting his trips in his car and stop using his furnace or AC.
Meanwhile, he continues with his top level dish network contract, continues to drive his gas guzzler, shops only at the high end market, drives superfluously, and has his health care provided to him because of his job.
i don't know whats worse, one who claims to be frugal but continues to waste money (and condemns others for wasting money) or the one who wastes money and tries to at least make things better (and does little to nothing to change their spending).