Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blg I don't need to quote stats or draw comps to justify my statement and the Yankees are a mediocre team. With a 41-36 record that stat sums it up nicely. You want some perspective...ok, <70 wins/season = bad team, >90 wins/season = good team. 71-89 wins/season = mediocre team. Good team threshold varies +1 to +3 depending on number of 90+ win teams in the league.
Anything else is cherry picking, and no level of that will make the 2015 Yankees a good team.
You might have missed this, 20 - 24 since May 11th. Not a very good team.
And technically, lol, the Yanks are on pace to win 85-86 games
...and?........ you think that will be enough to beat out the O's, Rays or Jays ?
...what it the name of Homerville makes you think they will improve over what they have been thus far?
I'm not going to dispute the meaning of your current or projected W-L totals but the season isn't quite half over.....still some time to evaluate and critique the good and bad aspects of the team with the hope things improve. And technically, lol, the Yanks are on pace to win 85-86 games and I guess it then depends on whether they improve by 5 or so games over their last 85 games to be considered a "good" team.
Part of the long season. Grist for the ever grinding mill.
Please note that I said >90 +1 to +3 games depending on the number of >90 win teams. So for those in Rio Linda, that means a 90 win team doesn't not automatically make them a 'good team'. This is a really simple concept. I also did not extrapolate current records for a reason, that's cherry-picking. You cannot predict the final standings even from mid-year stats.
The grist for the mill is your indefensible position of trying to 'spin facts' and convince the board that the 2015 Yankees are a good team. THEY AREN'T by any standards. The fact that they are winning more than losing is independent of the quality of this team. I'm a fan like you, it gives me no pleasure making these statements. But mgmt has squandered opportunities to put the best team in pinstripes on the field. Any that's why we have to watch a mediocre NY Yankees. My greatest solace is that Derek Jeter didn't have to endure this fuckery as his last season.
As I pointed out in today's game thread the Yankees when held to 3 runs or less are 5-25 this season. 2 runs or less they're 2-22
Yankees when held to 3 runs or less are 5-25 this season. 2 runs or less they're 2-22...
_________________
Which is a by product of having SP which up until now have a collective ERA over 4.00.
I won't make a major issue over it...(sound familiar?) but this "stat" you noted can possibly...perhaps...maybe....be called CHERRY PICKING in order to highlight your overral negative feeling about this team's chances of possibly winning this division or a possible WC. LMAO....
Obviously if your SP rank near the bottom of the league allowing at least 4 ER per game....you're not going to win alot of games when you score 3 or less runs! Jeez!
And may I ask a silly question?.....what is the average W-L record for ALL teams when scoring 3 or less runs excluding the top 2 or 3 teams with leading (lowest) ERA for SP?
lol.......nah......this can't be called CHERRY PICKING...not at all.
Don't take it personal Rick.....I know you're trying to contribute.
Keep up the good work.

This just in.......
Yanks lost yesterday 2-1 guaranteeing them a losing road trip to end this 20 game in 20 days stretch...with a real possibility of finishing the trip 2-5...and how did the Angels score their two runs?➡ TWO HOME RUNS!
Ironic huh?
...what's "ironic" about it?...do you know what the word means?
Sometimes "CHERRY PICKING" isn't only for homerific homers. Lol
...you still have not shown how rick was cherry-picking...do you know what the word means?
All in good fun.
Okay, I'm ready to face the usual triple teaming mugging. LMAO!
...it doesn't take 3 people to outmatch a twit who's obviously looking to stir shit up.
/
...no, actually, it's not cherry picking...the stats rick posted are for the whole year...and the Yanx currently high ERA has not been as high as it is now for the whole year...in fact, earlier in the season their team ERA was quite low.
How about the ("cherry picking" stat aka SLG%,? lmao )
Yanks SLG% W/risp and runners on base is NOT for the whole year?
No offense, but...because you choose to play it this way, I must say....if I had you and rick sitting at a table "discussing" these issues face to face with similar alotted time and a moderator....I would chew you both up for lunch....want to know why...simple...because BOTH of you choose to pick "fights" with me based on strawman issues.
...lmao..."no offense", but you're out of your fucking mind.
I don't know what the fuk both of your problems are...but I suspect you both feel insecure and feel as if your self induced titles of being king of the BOARD is questioned a bit too much.
..."king of the board"?...you're out of your fucking mind.
You fellas seem to prefer "YES MEN" who nod favorably with everything you say.
...you're paranoid and you're out of your fucking mind.
Sorry....I'm an independent thinker who is ready to explain and defend my opinions which may not agree with this bullsh!t little kangaroo court which YOU believe is your little kingdom.
...no, you're an independent idiot who's out of his fucking mind..
we're losing the corn crop this year, Blg can you please put the strawmen back where you found them.
...you're " an independent thinker..."
...rick and I "choose to pick fights" with you.
...rick and I "both feel insecure and feel as if our self induced titles of being king of the BOARD is questioned too much"
...you "would chew us both up for lunch"
LMAO...^^^ that has to be the most maniacal bunch of BS I've ever read on this board.
Stop backtracking......anyone with clear vision and an open mind can see - if I were to say the sea is wet....you would say it's dry.
...wtf are you talking about...how/when did I backtrack?...I didn't ...like I said, you're full of shit.
LMAO...quite okay.
I can handle it......kinda entertaining especially when the alarm goes off and you try and attack or belittle a cogent relevant point (post) I make.
...evidently you can't handle it, otherwise you wouldn't be whining that rick and I pick fights with you as well as that other garbage you posted.
The latest folly you attempted regarding one of my posts.....
I pointed out the OBVIOUS most pronounced "stat" which sheds light on the Yankees being one of the best run scoring teams in the league--▶ SLG% w//risp, runners on base. They have a mediocre (at best) BA w/risp but have the 2nd best SLG% in the league w/risp,runners on base- they have, so far produced alot of extra base hits in those situations. Of course we would like to see the BA w/risp much higher but the SLG% stat has been carrying them.
...how many times does it have to be pointed out that they have a good slugging % BECAUSE OF THE high anomalous number of HRs with RISP ? (post #17)...which where this started...Jesus, pay attention for a change.
What did I hear in return? I was "CHERRY PICKING"....lol..cherry picking!
Pointing out a superior team SLG% (W/runners on base) wasn't considered a legitimate, solid basic (reason) stat for the Yanks' being a good scoring team throughout the season....so far.
For example- I guess the difference between Wade Boggs and Hank Aaron is NOT SLG%..... nah.....that's "cherry picking"....After all, they both got over 3000 hits.....lol
Not much difference between Lou Brock and Willis Mays, both fast runners with 3000 hits........oops.....I forgot about SLG%....lmao
...^ as per usual, none of this drivel has anything to do with the BS you spewed that I cited in my previous post;
...you're " an independent thinker..."
...rick and I "choose to pick fights" with you.
...rick and I "both feel insecure and feel as if our self induced titles of being king of the BOARD is questioned too much"
...you "would chew us both up for lunch"
...again, you're out of your fucking mind.
Ringmaster - send in the clowns.
...no need to summon the clowns, you're already here.
